No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
The head and neck surgeon—activist or moralist?
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 29 June 2007
Abstract
An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Keywords
- Type
- Christmas Reflections
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © JLO (1984) Limited 1991
References
Strong, D. (1990) Medicine as a profession—times of change. British Medical Journal, 301: 691–692.Google Scholar
Bailar, N., Smith, E. M. (1986) Progress against cancer. New England Journal of Medicine, 314: 1226–1232.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Becker, , Smith, E. M. (1989) Time trends in cancer mortality in the German Federal Republic: Progress against cancer. International Journal Against Cancer, 43: 245–249.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Brewin, T. B. (1977) The cancer patient—communication and morale. British Medical Journal, 2: 1623–1627.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Caird, F. I., Brewin, T. B. (1990) Cancer in the elderly (first edition). London: Butterworth.Google Scholar
Canadian Cancer Society (1988) Canadian Cancer Statistics.Google Scholar
Harrison, D. F. N. (1990) Moral dilemmas in head and neck cancer. Laryngoscope, 100: 1191–1193.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kearsley, J. H. (1989) Recent innovations in head and neck cancer research. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Surgery, 59: 367–372.Google Scholar
Lock, S. (1990) If preventable, why not! British Medical Journal, 301: 1405–1406.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Morgan, F., Hirata, R. M., Jaques, D. A., Hooper, J. E. (1982) Deaths after major surgery. American Journal of Surgery, 144: 449–452.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sutherland, H. J., Llewellyn-Thomas, H. A., Lockwood, G. A. (1989) Cancer patients: their desire for information and participation in treatment decisions. Journal Royal Society of Medicine, 82: 260–263.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Temple, J., Burkitt, D. P. (1990) The war on cancer, failure of therapy and research: discussion paper. Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine, 84: 95–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar