Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-v9fdk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-08T12:22:18.225Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Facial nerve preservation in relation to tumour size in acoustic nerve tumour surgery

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 June 2007

A. W. Morrison
Affiliation:
Departments of Otolaryngology and Neurosurgery, The London Hospital, Whitechapel, London E1 1BB.
T. T. King
Affiliation:
Departments of Otolaryngology and Neurosurgery, The London Hospital, Whitechapel, London E1 1BB.

Summary

A SERIES of twenty-five cases of acoustic nerve tumours operated upon by a translabyrinthine-transtentorial technique, employing micro-surgical techniques is analysed from the point of view of preservation of the facial nerve after total removal. The size of the tumour, as expected, has been the most important factor in determining preservation of the structure. If there is to be a high rate of facial nerve preservation after acoustic nerve tumour surgery, the diagnosis must be made by the otologist (rather than the neurologist) who has the opportunity of diagnosing the lesion when it is still small.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © JLO (1984) Limited 1973

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1.Block, J. M. and Nathanson, M. J. (1963) Mount Sinae Hospital. A review of acoustic neuromas at the Mount Sinae Hospital, 30, 217.Google Scholar
2.House, W. F. (1964) Monograph. Transtemporal bone microsurgical removal of acoustic neuromas. Arch. Otolaryngol., 80, 597.Google Scholar
3.King, T. T. (1970) A combined translabyrinthine-transtentorial approach to acoustic nerve tumours. Proc. Roy. Soc. M., 63, 780.Google ScholarPubMed