Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-gb8f7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T05:31:30.377Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Evaluation of upper airway obstruction after partial laryngectomies by radiological method and flow–volume loop analysis

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 June 2007

M. Misiolek ,
D. Ziora ,
K. Oklek  and
G. Namyslowski
M. Misiolek*
Affiliation:
II Clinic of Laryngology, Silesian Medical Academy, Zabrze, Poland.
D. Ziora
Affiliation:
Clinic of Pneumology, Silesian Medical Academy, Zabrze, Poland.
K. Oklek
Affiliation:
Clinic of Pneumology, Silesian Medical Academy, Zabrze, Poland.
G. Namyslowski
Affiliation:
II Clinic of Laryngology, Silesian Medical Academy, Zabrze, Poland.
*
Maciej Misiolek, M.D., II Clinic of Laryngology SLAM, ul. Sklodowskiej 10, 41–800 Zabrze, Poland.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Anatomical and functional estimations of the upper airways in patients after partial laryngectomies (cordectomy, hemilaryngectomy, enlarged hemilaryngectomy) carried out due to cancer are discussed in this paper. The post-operative lumen of the larynx and the trachea were estimated by radiological examination. The coefficient larynx/trachea (L/T) was proposed to describe fixed obstruction.

At the same time, all patients underwent spirometric examinations. Inspiratory and expiratory parameters of the flow-volume loop were evaluated. In 39 patients the L/T coefficient was lower than in a group of patients with chronic bronchitis (P<0.05). Also inspiratory and some expiratory parameters of the flow–volume loop decreased in contrast to the group with chronic bronchitis. All results showed the usefulness of radiological and spirometric methods in detecting upper airway obstructions and confirmed their fixed character. The influence of the area of operation on the degree of upper airway obstruction was emphasized.

Keywords

Laryngeal neoplasms, surgeryRespiratory function tests
Type
Main Articles
Information
The Journal of Laryngology & Otology , Volume 108 , Issue 11 , November 1994 , pp. 954 - 956
Copyright
Copyright © JLO (1984) Limited 1994

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bailey, B. J., Biller, H. F. (1985). Surgery of the larynx. W. B. Saunders Co., Philadelphia/London/Toronto.Google Scholar
ordanglou, J., Pride, N. B. (1968) A comparison of maximum inspiratory and expiratory flow in health and in lung disease. Thorax 23: 38–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller, A. (1985). Pulmonary Function Tests in Clinical and Occupational Lung Disease, Grune and Stratton Inc., New York/London/Toronto.Google Scholar
Miller, M. R., Hyatt, R. E. (1973) Evaluation of obstructive lesions of the trachea and larynx by flow—volume loops. American Review of Respiratory Disease 108: 475–481.Google ScholarPubMed
Miller, M. R., Pincock, A. (1988) Predicated values: how should we use them? Thorax 43: 265–267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pierzchala, W. (1982) Przydatność badania wypadkowej maksmalnego przeplywu i objetosci w rozpoznaniu zwezenia krtani i tchawicy. Pneumonologia Polska 50: 25–30.Google Scholar
Quanjer, P. H. (1983) Standardized lung function testing. Bulletin Europea Physiopathologic Respirie 19 (Suppl): 1–3.Google Scholar
Sawicki, F. (1981). Statystyka dla lekarzy. Panstwowy Zaklad Wydawnictw Lekarskich Warszawa, pp 110–114.Google Scholar
Shim, C., Corro, P., Park, S. S., Wiliams, M. H. (1972) Pulmonary function studies in patients with upper airway obstruction. American Review of Respiratory Disease 106: 233–238.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed