Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dlnhk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T01:53:30.839Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Endoscopic posterior nasal neurectomy

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 August 2019

N Ahilasamy  and
K Rajendran Dinesh
N Ahilasamy
Affiliation:
Ahilasamy ENT Centre, Chennai, India
K Rajendran Dinesh*
Affiliation:
Department of ENT and Head-Neck Surgery, Hinduja Sindhi Hospital, Bengaluru, India
*
Author for correspondence: Dr Rajendran Dinesh Kumar, Department of ENT and Head-Neck Surgery, Hinduja Sindhi Hospital, Bengaluru 560027, Karnataka, India E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Background

Surgical techniques for resistant chronic rhinitis (rhinorrhoea) vary, ranging from vidian neurectomy to post-nasal neurectomy. The techniques vary mainly on the basis of instrumentation, and the avoidance of post-operative epistaxis, transient hypoesthesia of the soft palate and dryness of the eye. Endoscopic visualisation, and cauterisation or resection of posterior nasal nerve branches, can prevent such complications.

Method

The technique and surgical steps of endoscopic posterior nasal neurectomy are presented.

Results

The critical steps include: bilateral sphenopalatine nerve blocks, transnasally or transorally via the greater palatine foramen; vertical incisions made behind the posterior fontanelle; and elevation of the mucoperiosteal flap. The sphenopalatine foramen and artery is identified. The posterior nasal nerve is located 4–5 mm inferior to the sphenopalatine artery, and is resected or cauterised. The flaps are repositioned back into place. No post-operative nasal packing is required. The same procedure is performed on the opposite side for effective results.

Conclusion

This technique provides consistent, robust results, with long-term relief of allergic and vasomotor rhinitis related nasal symptoms, without risk of complication.

Keywords

Rhinitis, AllergicRhinitis, VasomotorPosterior Nasal NerveEndoscopicNeurectomy
Type
Short Communication
Information
The Journal of Laryngology & Otology , Volume 133 , Issue 9 , September 2019 , pp. 825 - 829
Copyright
Copyright © JLO (1984) Limited, 2019 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

Dr R D Kumar takes responsibility for the integrity of the content of the paper

References

1Golding-Wood, PH. Observations on petrosal and vidian neurectomy in chronic vasomotor rhinitis. J Laryngol Otol 1961;75:232–47Google Scholar
2Kikawada, T. Endoscopic posterior nasal neurectomy: an alternative to vidian neurectomy. Oper Tech Otolaryngol 2007;18:297–301Google Scholar
3Ikeda, K, Yokoi, H, Saito, T, Kawano, K, Yao, T, Furukawa, M. Effect of resection of the posterior nasal nerve on functional and morphological changes in the inferior turbinate mucosa. Acta Otolaryngol 2008;128:1337–41Google Scholar
4Kobayashi, T, Hyodo, M, Nakamura, K, Komobuchi, H, Honda, N. Resection of peripheral branches of the posterior nasal nerve compared to conventional posterior neurectomy in severe allergic rhinitis. Auris Nasus Larynx 2012;39:593–6Google Scholar
5Toma, S, Hopkins, C. Stratification of SNOT-22 scores into mild, moderate or severe and relationship with other subjective instruments. Rhinology 2016;54:129–33Google Scholar
6Ogawa, T, Takeno, S, Ishino, T, Hirakawa, K. Submucous turbinectomy combined with posterior nasal neurectomy in the management of severe allergic rhinitis: clinical outcomes and local cytokine changes. Auris Nasus Larynx 2007;34:319–26Google Scholar
7Malcomson, KG. The vasomotor activities of the nasal mucous membrane. J Laryngol Otol 1959;73:73–98Google Scholar