Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gbm5v Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T03:17:11.753Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Endoscopic laser myotomy in the treatment of pharyngeal diverticula

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 June 2007

R. A. Bradwell ,
A. K. Bieger ,
D. R. Strachan  and
J. J. Homer
R. A. Bradwell
Affiliation:
Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Harrogate District Hospital, Bradford, UK.
A. K. Bieger*
Affiliation:
Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Bradford Royal Infirmary, Bradford, UK.
D. R. Strachan
Affiliation:
Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Bradford Royal Infirmary, Bradford, UK.
J. J. Homer
Affiliation:
Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Bradford Royal Infirmary, Bradford, UK.
*
Address for correspondence: Astrid K. Bieger M.D., F.R.C.S. (Glas.), Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Bradford Royal Infirmary, Duckworth Lane, Bradford BD9 6RJ. Fax: 01274 364895
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The endoscopic approach is a simple and cost-effective option in the treatment of hypopharyngeal diverticula. Whereas almost a third of all endoscopic myotomies performed by UK otolaryngologists are carried out with the stapling technique, CO2 laser diverticulotomy has not been given as much consideration (Koay et al., in press).

We report on the first British series of 15 patients treated between 1985 and 1993 with microscopic laser diverticulotomy. The follow-up period was four to 11 years. Complications occurred in three patients, two patients required a repeat myotomy and 11 patients have been satisfied with their swallow since the operation.

Our results are similar to those of larger studies. The laser technique is more established than the stapling gun myotomy and it has the advantage of superior visualization. It may also be used in small pouches which do not admit the insertion of a stapling gun.

Keywords

Laser surgeryHypopharynx diverticula
Type
Main Articles
Information
The Journal of Laryngology & Otology , Volume 111 , Issue 7 , July 1997 , pp. 627 - 630
Copyright
Copyright © JLO (1984) Limited 1997

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bates, G. J., Koay, C. B. (1996) Endoscopic stapling diverticulotomy of pharyngeal pouch. Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England 78: 151–153.Google ScholarPubMed
Benjamin, B., Gallagher, R. (1993) Microendoscopic laser diverticulotomy for hypopharyngeal diverticulum. Annals of Otology, Rhinology and Laryngology 102:675–679.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Collard, J. M., Otte, J. B., Kestens, P. J. (1993) Endoscopic stapling technique of esophagodiverticulostomy for Zenker's diverticulum. Annals of ThoracicSurgery 56(3): 573–576.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dohlman, G., Mattsson, O. (1960) The endoscopic operation for hypopharyngeal diverticula. Acta Otolaryngologica (Stockholm) 71: 744–752.Google ScholarPubMed
Flikweert, D. C., van der Baan, S. (1992) Endoscopic treatment of pharyngeal pouches: electrocoagulation vs carbon dioxide (CO2) laser. Clinical Otolaryngology 17: 122–124.Google Scholar
Freeland, A. P., Bates, G. J. (1987) The surgical treatment of a pharyngeal pouch: inversion or excision? Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England 69: 57–58.Google Scholar
Fremling, C., Raivio, M., Karppinen, I. (1995) Endoscopic discision of Zenker's diverticulum. Annals Chirurgiae et Gynaecologiae 84(2): 169–172.Google ScholarPubMed
Hoeksema, P. E., Edens, E. T., van Overbeek, J. J. (1985) Microendoscopic surgery of the hypopharyngeal pouch with the CO2 laser. Lasers in Surgery and Medicine 5: 367–369.Google Scholar
Holinger, P. H., Jensik, R. (1973) Halting the progress of Zenker's diverticula. Geriatrics 28: 133–137.Google ScholarPubMed
Holinger, L. D., Benjamin, B. (1987) New endoscope for (laser) endoscopic diverticulotomy. Annals of Otology, Rhinology and Laryngology 96: 658–660.Google Scholar
Knegt, P. P., de Jong, P. C., van der Schans, E. J. (1985) Endoscopic treatment of the hypopharyngeal diverticulum with the CO2 laser. Endoscopy 17: 205–206.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Koay, C. B., Bates, G. J. (1996) Endoscopic stapling diverticulotomy for pharyngeal pouch. Clinical Otolaryngology 21: 371–376.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Koay, C. B., Sharp, H. R., Bates, G. J. (in press). Current practice in pharyngeal pouch surgery in England and Wales. Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England.Google Scholar
Kuhn, F. A., Bent, J. P. (1992) Zenker's diverticulotomy using the KTP/532 laser. Laryngoscope 102: 946–950.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mackay, I. S. (1976) The treatment of pharyngeal pouch. Journal of Laryngology and Otology 90:183–190.Google Scholar
Maran, A. G. D., Wilson, J. A., Al Muhanna, A. H. (1986) Pharyngeal diverticula. Clinical Otolaryngology 11: 219–255.Google Scholar
Maran, A. G. D., Gaze, M., Wilson, J. A. (1993) Benign disease of the neck. In Stell and Maran's Head and Neck Surgery. 3rd Edition, Butterworth-Heinemann Ltd., Oxford, pp 72–73.Google Scholar
Martin-Hirsch, D. P., Newbegin, C. J. (1993) Autosuture GIA gun: a new application in the treatment of hypopharyngeal diverticula. Journal of Laryngology and Otology 107(8): 723–725.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mosher, H. P. (1917) Webs and pouches of the esophagus, their diagnosis and treatment. Surgery Gynecology Obstetrics 25: 175–187.Google Scholar
Parker, A. J., Hawthorne, M. R. (1988) Endoscopic diverticulotomy versus external diverticulectomy in the treatment of pharyngeal pouch. Journal of the Royal College of Surgeons of Edinburgh 33: 61–64.Google Scholar
Scher, R. L., Richtsmeier, W. J. (1996) Endoscopic stapleassisted esophagodiverticulostomy for Zenker's diverticulum. Laryngoscope 106(8): 951–956.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Todd, G. B. (1974) The treatment of pharyngealpouch. Journal of Laryngology and Otology 88: 307–315.Google Scholar
van Overbeek, J. J., Hoeksema, P. E. (1982) Endoscopic treatment of the hypopharyngeal diverticulum: 211 cases. Laryngoscope 92: 88–91.Google Scholar
van Overbeek, J. J. (1994) Meditation on the pathogenesis of hypopharyngeal (Zenker's) diverticulum and a report of endoscopic treatment in 545 patients. Annals of Otology, Rhinology and Laryngology 103: 178–185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weerda, H., Ahrens, K. H., Schlenter, W. W. (1989) Measures for reducing the rate of complications in endoscopic surgery of Zenker's diverticulum. [German]. Laryngo-Rhino-Otologie 68: 675–677.Google Scholar
Wouters, B., van Overbeek, J. J. (1990) Pathogenesis and endoscopic treatment of the hypopharyngeal (Zenker's) diverticulum. [Review]. Acta Gastroenterologica Belgica 53: 323–329.Google Scholar