Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-ndw9j Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-05T11:42:22.274Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Encoding of a binaural speech stimulus at the brainstem level in middle-aged adults

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 November 2020

A K Neupane ,
S K Sinha  and
K Gururaj
A K Neupane*
Affiliation:
School of Audiology and Speech Language Pathology, Bharati Vidyapeeth (Deemed to be University), Pune, India
S K Sinha
Affiliation:
Department of Audiology, All India Institute of Speech and Hearing, Mysore, India
K Gururaj
Affiliation:
Department of Audiology, All India Institute of Speech and Hearing, Mysore, India
*
Author for correspondence: Mr Anuj Kumar Neupane, School of Audiology and Speech Language Pathology, Bharati Vidyapeeth (Deemed to be University), Pune, India E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Objective

Binaural hearing is facilitated by neural interactions in the auditory pathway. Ageing results in impairment of localisation and listening in noisy situations without any significant hearing loss. The present study focused on comparing the binaural encoding of a speech stimulus at the subcortical level in middle-aged versus younger adults, based on speech-evoked auditory brainstem responses.

Methods

Thirty participants (15 young adults and 15 middle-aged adults) with normal hearing sensitivity (less than 15 dB HL) participated in the study. The speech-evoked auditory brainstem response was recorded monaurally and binaurally with a 40-ms /da/ stimulus. Fast Fourier transform analysis was utilised.

Results

An independent sample t-test revealed a significant difference between the two groups in fundamental frequency (F0) amplitude recorded with binaural stimulation.

Conclusion

The present study suggested that ageing results in degradation of F0 encoding, which is essential for the perception of speech in noise.

Keywords

Binaural HearingBinaural AdvantageAgingFundamental Frequency
Type
Main Articles
Information
The Journal of Laryngology & Otology , Volume 134 , Issue 12 , December 2020 , pp. 1044 - 1051
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2020. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

Mr A K Neupane takes responsibility for the integrity of the content of the paper

References

Pollack, I, Pickett, JM. Stereophonic listening and speech intelligibility against voice babble. J Acoust Soc Am 1958;30:131–3CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Konkle, D, Schwartz, DM. Binaural amplification: a paradox. In: Bess, FH, Freeman, BA, Sinclair, S, eds. Amplification in Education. Washington, DC: Alexander Graham Bell Association for the Deaf, 1981;342–57Google Scholar
Hirsh, IJ. Binaural hearing aids: a review of some experiments. J Speech Hear Disord 1950;15:114–23CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dobie, RA, Berlin, CI. Binaural interaction in brainstem-evoked responses. Arch Otolaryngol 1979;105:391–8CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dobie, R, Norton, SJ. Binaural interaction in human auditory evoked potentials. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1980;49:303–13CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ito, S, Hoke, M, Pantev, C, Lütkenhöner, B. Binaural interaction in brainstem auditory evoked potentials elicited by frequency-specific stimuli. Hear Res 1988;35:9–19CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Parthasarathy, TK, Moushegian, G. Rate, frequency, and intensity effects on early auditory evoked potentials and binaural interaction component in humans. J Am Acad Audiol 1993;4:229–37Google ScholarPubMed
Krishnan, A, McDaniel, SS. Binaural interaction in the human frequency-following response: effects of interaural intensity difference. Audiol Neurootol 1998;3:291–9CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ballachanda, BB, Moushegian, G. Frequency-following response: effects of interaural time and intensity differences. J Am Acad Audiol 2000;11:1–11Google ScholarPubMed
McPherson, DL, Tures, C, Starr, A. Binaural interaction of the auditory brain-stem potentials and middle latency auditory evoked potentials in infants and adults. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1989;74:124–30CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Suzuki, T, Kobayashi, K, Aoki, K, Umegaki, Y. Effect of sleep on binaural interaction in auditory brainstem response and middle latency response. Audiology 1992;31:2–30Google ScholarPubMed
Debruyne, F. Binaural interaction in early, middle and late auditory evoked responses. Scand Audiol 1984;13:293–6CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McPherson, DL, Starr, A. Binaural interaction in auditory evoked potentials: brainstem, middle- and long-latency components. Hear Res 1993;66:91–8CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bamford, J, Saunders, E. Hearing impairment, auditory perception and language disability (2nd edition). Child Lang Teach Ther 1992;8:227–8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jerger, J, Jerger, S, Oliver, T, Pirozzolo, F. Speech understanding in the elderly. Ear Hear 1989;10:79–89CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Humes, LE. Speech understanding in the elderly. J Am Acad Audiol 1996;7:161–7Google ScholarPubMed
Dubno, JR, Lee, FS, Matthews, LJ, Mills, JH. Age-related and gender-related changes in monaural speech recognition. J Speech Lang Hear Res 1997;40:444–52CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Willott, JF. Aging and the Auditory System. Anatomy, Physiology, and Psychophysics. San Diego: Singular Pub Group, 1991;168–201Google Scholar
Moore, BC, Vickers, DA, Mehta, A. The effects of age on temporal fine structure sensitivity in monaural and binaural conditions. Int J Audiol 2012;51:715–21CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gallun, FJ, McMillan, GP, Molis, MR, Kampel, SD. Relating age and hearing loss to monaural, bilateral, and binaural temporal sensitivity. Front Neurosci 2014;8:172CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Frisina, DR, Frisina, RD. Speech recognition in noise and presbycusis: relations to possible neural mechanisms. Hear Res 1997;106:95–104CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schneider, B, Pichora-Fuller, MK. Implications of sensory deficits for cognitive aging. In: Craik, FIM, Salthouse, T, eds. The Handbook of Aging and Cognition, 2nd edn. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum, 2000;155–219Google Scholar
Humes, LE, Roberts, L. Speech-recognition difficulties of the hearing-impaired elderly: the contributions of audibility. J Speech Lang Hear Res 1990;33:726–35CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wiley, TL, Cruickshanks, KJ, Nondahl, DM, Tweed, TS, Klein, R, Klein, BE. Aging and word recognition in competing message. J Am Acad Audiol 1998;9:191–8Google ScholarPubMed
Humes, LE, Christopherson, L. Speech identification difficulties of hearing-impaired elderly persons: the contributions of auditory processing deficits. J Speech Lang Hear Res 1991;34:686–93CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Divenyi, PL, Haupt, KM. Audiological correlates of speech understanding deficits in elderly listeners with mild-to-moderate hearing loss. I. Age and lateral asymmetry effects. Ear Hear 1997;18:42–61CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jerger, J, Chmiel, R. Factor analytic structure of auditory impairment in elderly persons. J Am Acad Audiol 1997;8:269–76Google ScholarPubMed
Helfer, KS, Wilber, LA. Hearing loss, aging, and speech perception in reverberation and noise. J Speech Lang Hear Res 1990;33:149–55CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dubno, JR, Horwitz, AR, Ahlstrom, JB. Benefit of modulated maskers for speech recognition by younger and older adults with normal hearing. J Acoust Soc Am 2002;111:2897–907CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wingfield, A, McCoy, SL, Peelle, JE, Tun, PA, Cox, C. Effects of adult aging and hearing loss on comprehension of rapid speech varying in syntactic complexity. J Am Acad Audiol 2006;17:487–97Google ScholarPubMed
Divenyi, PL, Stark, PB, Haupt, KM. Decline of speech understanding and auditory thresholds in the elderly. J Acoust Soc Am 2005;118:1089–100CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Xing, Y, Samuvel, DJ, Stevens, SM, Dubno, JR, Schulte, BA, Lang, H. Age-related changes of myelin basic protein in mouse and human auditory nerve. PloS One 2012;7:e34500CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Frisina, RD, Walton, JP. Age-related structural and functional changes in the cochlear nucleus. Hear Res 2006;216:216–23CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Walton, JP. Timing is everything: temporal processing deficits in the aged auditory brainstem. Hear Res 2010;264:63–9CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Willott, JF, Parham, K, Hunter, KP. Response properties of inferior colliculus neurons in young and very old CBA/J mice. Hear Res 1988;37:1–4CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Milbrandt, JC, Albin, RL, Caspary, DM. Age-related decrease in GABAB receptor binding in the Fischer 344 rat inferior colliculus. Neurobiol Aging 1994;15:699–703CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Milbrandt, JC, Holder, TM, Wilson, MC, Salvi, RJ, Caspary, DM. GAD levels and muscimol binding in rat inferior colliculus following acoustic trauma. Hear Res 2000;147:251–60CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Caspary, DM, Raza, A, Armour, BL, Pippin, J, Arneric, SP. Immunocytochemical and neurochemical evidence for age-related loss of GABA in the inferior colliculus: implications for neural presbycusis. J Neurosci 1990;10:2363–72CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rosenhamer, HJ, Lindström, B, Lundborg, T. On the use of click-evoked electric brainstem responses in audiological diagnosis: II. The influence of sex and age upon the normal response. Scand Audiol 1980;9:93–100CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Soucek, S, Mason, SM. Effects of adaptation on electrocochleography and auditory brain-stem responses in the elderly. Scand Audiol 1992;21:149–52CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lenzi, A, Chiarelli, G, Sambataro, G. Comparative study of middle-latency responses and auditory brainstem responses in elderly subjects. Audiology 1989;28:144–51CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kırkım, G, Madanoglu, N, Akdas, F, Serbetcioglu, MB. Comparison of middle latency responses in presbycusis patients with two different speech recognition scores. Auris Nasus Larynx 2007;34:453–8CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pfefferbaum, A, Ford, JM, Roth, WT, Kopell, BS. Age-related changes in auditory event-related potentials. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1980;49:266–76CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Picton, TW, Stuss, DT, Champagne, SC, Nelson, RF. The effects of age on human event-related potentials. Psychophysiology 1984;21:312–26CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Barr, RA, Giambra, LM. Age-related decrement in auditory selective attention. Psychol Aging 1990;5:597–9CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Neupane, AK, Gururaj, K, Mehta, G, Sinha, SK. Effect of repetition rate on speech evoked auditory brainstem response in younger and middle aged individuals. Audiol Res 2014;4:106CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fitzgibbons, PJ, Gordon-Salant, S. Auditory temporal processing in elderly listeners. J Am Acad Audiol 1996;7:183–9Google ScholarPubMed
Grose, JH, Hall, JW 3rd, Buss, E. Temporal processing deficits in the pre-senescent auditory system. J Acoust Soc Am 2006;119:2305–15CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Glyde, H, Hickson, L, Cameron, S, Dillon, H. Problems hearing in noise in older adults: a review of spatial processing disorder. Trends Amplif 2011;15:116–26CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Helfer, KS, Vargo, M. Speech recognition and temporal processing in middle-aged women. J Am Acad Audiol 2009;20:264–71Google ScholarPubMed
Russo, N, Nicol, T, Musacchia, G, Kraus, N. Brainstem responses to speech syllables. Clin Neurophysiol 2004;115:2021–30CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Banai, K, Nicol, T, Zecker, SG, Kraus, N. Brainstem timing: implications for cortical processing and literacy. J Neurosci 2005;25:9850–7CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sinha, SK, Basavaraj, V. Speech evoked auditory brainstem responses: a new tool to study brainstem encoding of speech sounds. Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2010;62:395–9CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sinha, SK, Basavaraj, V. Auditory brainstem responses to forward and reversed speech in normal hearing. J All India Inst Speech Hear 2010;29:232–40Google Scholar
Krishnan, A. Human frequency-following responses: representation of steady-state synthetic vowels. Hear Res 2002;166:192–201CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Aiken, SJ, Picton, TW. Envelope and spectral frequency-following responses to vowel sounds. Hear Res 2008;245:35–47CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Akhoun, I, Moulin, A, Jeanvoine, A, Ménard, M, Buret, F, Vollaire, C et al. Speech auditory brainstem response (speech ABR) characteristics depending on recording conditions, and hearing status: an experimental parametric study. J Neurosci Methods 2008;175:196–205CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Carhart, R, Jerger, JF. Preferred method for clinical determination of pure-tone thresholds. J Speech Hear Disord 1959;24:330–45CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anderson, S, Parbery-Clark, A, Yi, HG, Kraus, N. A neural basis of speech-in-noise perception in older adults. Ear Hear 2011;32:750–7CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Anderson, S, Parbery-Clark, A, White-Schwoch, T, Kraus, N. Aging affects neural precision of speech encoding. J Neurosci 2012;32:14156–64CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Vander Werff, KR, Burns, KS. Brainstem responses to speech in younger and older adults. Ear Hear 2011;32:168–80CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Parbery-Clark, A, Anderson, S, Hittner, E, Kraus, N. Musical experience offsets age-related delays in neural timing. Neurobiol Aging 2012;33:1483.e1–4CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Clinard, CG, Tremblay, KL, Krishnan, AR. Aging alters the perception and physiological representation of frequency: evidence from human frequency-following response recordings. Hear Res 2010;264:48–55CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sanchez, L, Lam, E. Evaluation of screening instruments for auditory processing disorder (APD) in a sample of referred children. Aust N Z J Audiol 2007;29:26–39Google Scholar
He, NJ, Mills, JH, Ahlstrom, JB, Dubno, JR. Age-related differences in the temporal modulation transfer function with pure-tone carriers. J Acoust Soc Am 2008;124:3841–9CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Harris, KC, Mills, JH, He, NJ, Dubno, JR. Age-related differences in sensitivity to small changes in frequency assessed with cortical evoked potentials. Hear Res 2008;243:47–56CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mills, JH, Schmiedt, RA, Schulte, BA, Dubno, JR. Age-related hearing loss: a loss of voltage, not hair cells. Semin Hear 2006;27:228–36CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moser, T, Neef, A, Khimich, D. Mechanisms underlying the temporal precision of sound coding at the inner hair cell ribbon synapse. J Physiol 2006;576:55–62CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed