Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2plfb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-01T17:10:41.441Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Effect of Acetazolamid* on the Electrolyte-Household of the Inner Ear in Mammals. Examinations Carried Out in the Perilymph

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 June 2007

Gyula Varga ,
Ernö Miriszlai  and
László Z. Szabó
Gyula Varga
Affiliation:
Otolaryngological Department, Medical University of Budapest, Budapest, VIII. Szigony utca 36. and Pediatrical Department of the Medical University of Budapest, Budapest, II. Tuzoltó utca 7-9.
Ernö Miriszlai
Affiliation:
Otolaryngological Department, Medical University of Budapest, Budapest, VIII. Szigony utca 36. and Pediatrical Department of the Medical University of Budapest, Budapest, II. Tuzoltó utca 7-9.
László Z. Szabó
Affiliation:
Otolaryngological Department, Medical University of Budapest, Budapest, VIII. Szigony utca 36. and Pediatrical Department of the Medical University of Budapest, Budapest, II. Tuzoltó utca 7-9.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Research Article
Information
The Journal of Laryngology & Otology , Volume 80 , Issue 3 , March 1966 , pp. 270 - 275
Copyright
Copyright © JLO (1984) Limited 1966

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Arslan, M. (1963) Z. Laryng. Rhinol., 42, 401.Google Scholar
Del Bo, M., Aliprandi, G. and Presenti, M. (1963) Arch. ital. Otol., 74, 387.Google Scholar
Corvera, J. (1956) Ann. Otol. (St. Louis), 65, 351.Google Scholar
Hladký, R., Brada, Z. and Kočent, A. (1960) Acta oto-laryng. (Stockh.), 51, 424.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Muftic, M. K. (1957) Arch. Otolaryng., 65, 575.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Perlman, H. B., Goldinger, J. M. and Cales, J. O. (1953) Laryngoscope (St. Louis), 63, 640.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rauch, S. and Köstlin, A. (1962) Z. Laryng. Rhinol., 41, 56.Google Scholar
Schuknecht, H. F., Benitez, J. T. and Beekuis, J. (1962) Ann. Otol. (St. Louis), 71, 1039.Google Scholar
Tasaki, I., Davis, H. and Eldredge, D. H. (1954) J. acoust. Soc. Amer., 26, 765.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Varga, Gy. and Ribári, O. (1958) Orv. Hetilap., 99, 1458.Google Scholar
Varga, Gy., Miriszlai, E., Szabó, Z., Közles, L. alatt.Google Scholar
Vosteen, K. H. (1961) Arch. Ohr-, Nas.-, u. Kehlk.-Heilk., 178, 1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wullstein, H. L. and Rauch, S. (1961) Arch. Otolaryng., 73, 262.Google Scholar