Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-ndw9j Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-17T14:53:01.540Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Editorial

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 June 2007

John H. Topham
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. As you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Editorial
Information
The Journal of Laryngology & Otology , Volume 106 , Issue 10 , October 1992 , pp. 861 - 862
Copyright
Copyright © JLO (1984) Limited 1992

References

Department of Health. (1989) Working for Patients: Medical Audit (Working Paper No. 6) HMSO: London.Google Scholar
Dunn, D. C., Dale, R. F.Gumpert, J. R. W., Duffy, T. J. (1992) Combined surgical audit by microcomputer involving units in four health regions. Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England, 74: 47–53.Google Scholar
Quality of Medical Care (1990). Report of Standing Medical Advisory Committee. HMSO.Google Scholar
Royal College of Surgeons of England (1989) Guidelines to Clinical Audit in Surgical Practice.Google Scholar
Royal College of Surgeons of England (1991) Guidelines for Surgical Audit by Computer.Google Scholar
Shaw, C. D. (1992) Speciality Medical Audit, Kings Fund Centre, London.Google Scholar
Smyth, G. D. L. (1992) Toynbee Memorial Lecture. Journal of Laryngology and Otology, 106: 591–596.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stirrat, G. M., Farndon, J., Farrow, S. C.Dwyer, N. (1992) The challenge of evaluating surgical procedures. Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England, 74: 80–84.Google ScholarPubMed