Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dsjbd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T16:48:23.770Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Difference Limen of Intensity Variations of Pure Tones and its Diagnostic Significance

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 June 2007

E. Lüscher
E. Lüscher
Affiliation:
Basle
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Research Article
Information
The Journal of Laryngology & Otology , Volume 65 , Issue 7 , July 1951 , pp. 486 - 510
Copyright
Copyright © JLO (1984) Limited 1951

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Békésy, G. v. (1947 a) Acta oto-laryng., Stockh., 35, 411.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Békésy, G. v. (1947 b) Laryngoscope, St. Louis, 57, 765.Google Scholar
Brinitzer, W. (1935) Mschr. Ohrenheilk., 69, 1301.Google Scholar
De Bruīne-Altes, J. C. (1946) “Academisch Proefschrift.” Groningen.Google Scholar
Denes, P., and Naunton, R. F. (1949) J. Laryng. and Otol., 63, 251.Google Scholar
Dix, M. R., Hallpike, C. S., and Hood, J. D. (1948) Proc. roy. Soc. Med., 41, 516.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Doerfler, L., and Stewart, K. (1946) J. Speech Disorders, 11, 181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fowler, E. P. (1928) Arch. Otolaryng., Chicago, 8, 151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fowler, E. P. (1936) Arch. Otolaryng., Chicago, 24, 731.Google Scholar
Fowler, E. P. (1937) Laryngosccpe, St. Louis, 47, 289.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Halm, T. (1949) J. Laryng. and Otol., 63, 464.Google Scholar
Holmgren, G. (1948) Pract. oto-rhino-laryng., 10, 230.Google Scholar
Langenbeck, B. (1949) Z. Laryng., 28, 463.Google Scholar
Lurie, M. H. (1940) J. acoust. Soc. Amer., 11, 420.Google Scholar
Lüscher, R. (1949) Pract. oto-rhino-laryng., 11, 107.Google Scholar
Lüscher, R. and Ermanni, A. (1950) Arch. Ohr.–, Nas.– u. KehlkHeilk., in the pressGoogle Scholar
Lüscher, R.Z. Hals.–, Nas.– u. Ohrenheilh., in the press.Google Scholar
Lüscher, R. and Zwislocki, J. (1945) Experientia, 1, 231.Google Scholar
Lüscher, R. and Zwislocki, J. (1948 a) Arch. Ohr.–, Nas.–, u. Kehlhheilk., 155, 323.Google Scholar
Lüscher, R. and Zwislocki, J. (1948 b) Acta oto-laryng., Stockh., Suppl. 78, p. 156.Google Scholar
Lüscher, R. and Zwislocki, J. (1949 a) Mschr. Ohrenheilk., 83, 184.Google Scholar
Lüscher, R. and Zwislocki, J. (1949 b) Acta oto-laryng., Stockh., Suppl. 76, p. 26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Maré, G. (1939) Acta oto-laryng., Stockh., Suppl. 31.Google Scholar
Neuberger, F. (1950) Mschr. Ohrenheilk., in the press.Google Scholar
Riesz, R. P. (1928) Physiol. Rev., 31, 867.Google Scholar
Riesz, R. P. (1933) J. acoust. Soc. Amer., 4, 211.Google Scholar
Shambaugh, G. E. Jr. (1949) Acta oto-laryng., Stockh., Suppl. 79.Google Scholar
Steinberg, J. C., and Gardner, M. B. (1937) J. acoust. Soc. Amer., 9, 11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stoecklin, E. (1950) Arch. Ohr.–, Nas.–, u. KehlkHeilk., 157, 1.Google Scholar
Tumarkin, A. (1950) J. Laryng. and Otol., 64, 178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zwislocki, J. (1948) Acta oto-laryng., Stockh., Suppl. 72.Google Scholar