Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7fkt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-27T08:45:44.837Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Diagnostic vetting of individuals with asymmetric sensorineural hearing impairments

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 June 2007

I. R. C. Swan
I. R. C. Swan*
Affiliation:
Glasgow
*
I. R. C. Swan, M.D., F.R.C.S., Senior Lecturer, Department of Otolaryngology, University of Glasgow, Royal Infirmary, Glasgow G4 0SF
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Audiological and vestibular tests were administered conjointly in a neurological or general ORL clinic to exclude cerebellopontine angle (CPA) tumours. This study aimed to assess the efficiency of various tests in achieving that exclusion with the minimum of unnecessary investigations. All patients received the full battery of auditory brainstem responses, acoustic reflex thresholds and decay, alternate binaural loudness balance and ENG and caloric testing. All patients who did not have normal auditory brainstem responses proceeded to high resolution CT scanning. One hundred and fifteen patients were investigated and four acoustic neuromas were diagnosed. The efficiency of these tests in a general ORL clinic is very much poorer than often suggested, due largely to the number of occasions on which the tests cannot be done, and to the very small proportion of the test population who have CPA tumours.

Type
Main Articles
Information
The Journal of Laryngology & Otology , Volume 103 , Issue 9 , September 1989 , pp. 823 - 826
Copyright
Copyright © JLO (1984) Limited 1989

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Barrs, D. M. and Olsson, J. E. (1987) The audiological evaluation of cerebellopontine angle tumour suspects: a review of tumour and non-tumour suspects. Otolaryngology—Head and Neck Surgery, 96: 523–532.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hallpike, C. S. (1956) The caloric test. Journal of Laryngology and Otology, 70: 15–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hood, J. D. (1969) Basic audiological requirements in neurootology. Journal of Laryngology and Otology, 83: 695–711.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jerger, J. and Hayes, D. (1980) diagnostic applications of impedance audiometry: middle ear disorder, sensorineural disorder. In: Clinical Impedance Audiometry, 2nd edition. Ed. Jerger, and Norther, , Am. Electromedics Corp., Acton.Google Scholar
Jerger, S, and Jerger, J. (1983) Evaluation of diagnostic audiometric tests. Audiology, 22: 144–161.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Johnson, E. W. (1977) Auditory test results in 500 cases of acoustic neuroma. Archives of Otolaryngology, 103: 152–158.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jongkees, L. B. W. (1973) The caloric test and its value in the evaluation of the patient with vertigo. Otolaryngology Clinics of North America, 6: 73–93.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Musiek, F. E., Josey, A. F. and Glasscock, M. E. (1986) Auditory brainstem response in patients with acoustic neuromas. Archives of Otolaryngology, 112: 186–189.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Norre, M. E. (1978) The unilateral vestibular hypofunction. Acta Otorhinolaryngolica Belgica, 32: 421–468.Google ScholarPubMed
Priede, V. M. and Coles, R. R. A. (1974) Interpretation of loudness recruitment tests—some new concepts and criteria. Journal of Laryngology and Otology, 88: 641–662.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sanders, J. W., Josey, A. F. and Glasscock, M. E. (1974) Audiological evaluation in cochlear and eighth nerve disorders. Archives of Otolaryngology, 100: 283–289.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sanders, J. W., Josey, A. F. and Glasscock, M. E. (1981) The acoustic reflex test in cochlear and eighth nerve pathology ears. Laryngoscope, 91: 787–793.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Turner, R. G., Shepard, N. T. and Frazer, G. J. (1984) Clinical performance of audiological and related diagnostic tests. Ear and Hearing, 5: 187–194.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed