Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7czq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T22:21:05.178Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Current innovations in otolaryngology medical education in the UK: a systematic literature review

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 March 2020

H M Yip ,
T C F Soh  and
Z Z Lim
H M Yip*
Affiliation:
Emergency Department, Royal Free Hospital, London, UK
T C F Soh
Affiliation:
Geriatrics Department, Basingstoke and North Hampshire Hospital, UK
Z Z Lim
Affiliation:
Acute Medicine Department, University College London Hospital, UK
*
Author for correspondence: Dr Hao Meng Yip, Emergency Department, Royal Free Hospital, Pond Street, Hampstead, LondonNW3 2QG, UK E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Objective

Recent studies have indicated a lack of ENT training at the undergraduate and post-graduate levels. This study aimed to review the impact of recent educational innovations in improving ENT training for medical students and junior doctors in the UK.

Methods

Three independent investigators conducted a literature search of published articles on ENT education. Included studies were analysed using qualitative synthesis methods.

Results

An initial search yielded 2008 articles; 44 underwent full-text evaluation and 5 were included for final analysis. Most included studies demonstrated benefits for students when compared to existing teaching standards in terms of objective assessment (knowledge and skills gained) or subjective assessment (confidence and preference) following implemented educational innovations.

Conclusion

This study identified educational innovations developed in the past 15 years to enhance the teaching of core ENT competencies. More research is needed to establish their impact on the state of ENT medical education in the UK.

Keywords

OtolaryngologyUndergraduate Medical EducationMedical StudentsGraduate Medical Education
Type
Review Articles
Information
The Journal of Laryngology & Otology , Volume 134 , Issue 4 , April 2020 , pp. 284 - 292
Copyright
Copyright © JLO (1984) Limited, 2020

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

Dr H M Yip takes responsibility for the integrity of the content of the paper

References

Griffiths, E. Incidence of ENT problems in general practice. J R Soc Med 1979;72:740–2CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Powell, S. So you want to be an ENT surgeon. BMJ 2007;334:s205–7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sharma, A, Machen, K, Clarke, B, Howard, D. Is undergraduate otorhinolaryngology teaching relevant to junior doctors working in accident and emergency departments? J Laryngol Otol 2006;120:949–51CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Khan, MM, Saeed, SR. Provision of undergraduate otorhinolaryngology teaching within General Medical Council approved UK medical schools: what is current practice? J Laryngol Otol 2012;126:340–4CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Powell, J, Cooles, FAH, Carrie, S, Paleri, V. Is undergraduate medical education working for ENT surgery? A survey of UK medical school graduates. J Laryngol Otol 2011;125:896–905CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chawdhary, G, Ho, EC, Minhas, SS. Undergraduate ENT education: what students want. Clin Otolaryngol 2009;34:584–5CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ishman, SL, Stewart, CM, Senser, E, Stewart, RW, Stanley, J, Stierer, KD et al. Qualitative synthesis and systematic review of otolaryngology in undergraduate medical education. Laryngoscope 2015;125:2695–708CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ferguson, GR, Bacila, IA, Swamy, M. Does current provision of undergraduate education prepare UK medical students in ENT? A systematic literature review. BMJ Open 2016;6:e010054CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mace, AD, Narula, AA. Survey of current undergraduate otolaryngology training in the United Kingdom. J Laryngol Otol 2004;118:217–20CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Morris, S, Osborne, MS, Bowyer, D. Head and neck anatomy: effect of focussed near-peer teaching on anatomical confidence in undergraduate medical students. J Surg Educ 2018;75:1486–90CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Elloy, M, Sama, A. Does an ENT introductory course improve junior doctors' confidence in managing ENT emergencies? Ann R Coll Surg Engl (Suppl) 2010;92:1–5CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Constable, JD, Moghul, GA, Leighton, P, Schofield, SJ, Daniel, M. Prioritising topics for the undergraduate ENT curriculum. J Laryngol Otol 2017;131:631–9CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lloyd, S, Tan, ZE, Taube, MA, Doshi, J. Development of an ENT undergraduate curriculum using a Delphi survey. Clin Otolaryngol 2014;39:281–8CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Doshi, J, McDonald, J. Determining the content of an educational ENT website using the Delphi technique. J Laryngol Otol 2012;126:402–6CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wong, A, Fung, K. Otolaryngology in undergraduate medical education. J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2009;38:38–48CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lee, MS, Montague, ML, Hussain, SS. Student-perceived benefit from otolaryngology theatre attendance. J Laryngol Otol 2005;119:293–8CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Carr, MM, Brown, DH, Reznick, RK. Needs assessment for an undergraduate otolaryngology curriculum. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1999;120:865–8CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Royal College of Surgeons of England. National Undergraduate Curriculum in Surgery. London: RCSENG - Professional Standards and Regulation, 2015Google Scholar
Centre for Reviews and Dissemination, University of York. Systematic Reviews: CRD's Guidance for Undertaking Reviews in Health Care. York: Centre for Reviews and Dissemination, University of York, 2009Google Scholar
Alnabelsi, T, Al-Hussaini, A, Owens, D. Comparison of traditional face-to-face teaching with synchronous e-learning in otolaryngology emergencies teaching to medical undergraduates: a randomised controlled trial. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2015;272:759–63CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Smith, ME, Leung, BC, Sharma, R, Nazeer, S, McFerran, DJ. A randomized controlled trial of nasolaryngoscopy training techniques. Laryngoscope 2014;124:2034–8CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Edmond, M, Neville, F, Khalil, HS. A comparison of teaching three common ear, nose, and throat conditions to medical students through video podcasts and written handouts: a pilot study. Adv Med Educ Pract 2016;7:281–6Google ScholarPubMed
Smith, ME, Trinidade, A, Tysome, JR. The ENT boot camp: an effective training method for ENT induction. Clin Otolaryngol 2016;41:421–4CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kanegaonkar, RG, Vaz, FM, Desai, K. The Brighton ENT introductory course. CME Bulletin Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery 2005;8:111–13Google Scholar
O'Neill, B, Gill, E, Brown, P. Deaf awareness and sign language: an innovative special study module. Med Educ 2005;39:519–20CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Thio, D. 6th Basic Science for Otolaryngology Course University of Dundee Medical School Ninewells Hospital, Dundee 18th-21st April 2005. Otorhinolaryngologist 2006;1:46Google Scholar
Makura, ZG, Webster, J, Mills, T. Foundation year two in ENT: a brave new (training) world. Clin Otolaryngol 2007;32:319–20CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Murphy, J, Murphy, JT, Sama, A. Quinsy trainer. J Laryngol Otol 2007;121:1194–6CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Newbegin, RM, Rhodes, JC, Flood, LM, Richardson, HC. Student-selected components: bringing more ENT into the undergraduate curriculum. J Laryngol Otol 2007;121:783–5CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Vasani, S. MMC. A trainees experiences. Otorhinolaryngologist 2007;1:97–8Google Scholar
Sharma, R, Fu, B, Sharp, H. Re: Is that the ENT SHO? Concerns over training and cross cover. Clin Otolaryngol 2010;35:74CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fraser, L, Gunasekaran, S, Mistry, D, Ward, VMM. Current use of and attitudes to e-learning in otolaryngology: questionnaire survey of UK otolaryngology trainees. J Laryngol Otol 2011;125:338–42CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Holland, JP, Waugh, L, Horgan, A, Paleri, V, Deehan, DJ. Cadaveric hands-on training for surgical specialties: is this back to the future for surgical skills development? J Surg Educ 2011;68:110–16CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Amin, K, Hone, R. Surgical induction courses: a junior trainee's perspective. Clin Teacher 2012;9:415–16CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bannister, M. Improving the GP VTS training experience in ENT. Clin Otolaryngol 2012;1(suppl):63Google Scholar
Bannister, M. Current UK undergraduate training in otolaryngology: a 10 year national review. Clin Otolaryngol 2012;1(suppl):63Google Scholar
Hettige, R, Pankhania, M, Patel, K, Demetriou, V, Draper, M. ENT cross-cover survey: factors that influence trainees' confidence levels in managing common ENT on-call emergencies. Clin Otolaryngol 2012;1(suppl):35Google Scholar
Lightbody, KA, Wilkie, MD. Current ENT training within the UK. Clin Otolaryngol 2012;37:84–5CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pal, R, Zarod, A. Evaluating the use of simulation in facilitating training in airway assessment. Clin Otolaryngol 2012;37(suppl 1):38Google Scholar
Tan, ZE, Chan, D, Mak, R, Ridges-Jones, L, Tsai, M, Veitch, J et al. Student-led otology teaching. Clin Otolaryngol 2012;1(suppl):161–2Google Scholar
McGlade, K, Saunders, E, Thomson, C, Woodside, JV. Deaf awareness training in medical schools. Med Teach 2013;35:789–90CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Reznitsky, M, Gohil, RD, Nogueira, C, Sahota, RS, Sama, A. Does an introductory ENT course immediately improve clinical decision making? Int J Surg 2014;3:S42CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stobbs, N, Kumar, BN. The role of simulation in surgical training. Otorhinolaryngologist 2014;7:169–72Google Scholar
Jain, M, Jain, V, Hopkins, C. Undergraduate otolaryngology training in the United Kingdom, any change? Ir J Med Sci 2015;184(suppl):S117Google Scholar
Piromchai, P, Avery, A, Laopaiboon, M, Kennedy, G, O'Leary, S. Virtual reality training for improving the skills needed for performing surgery of the ear, nose or throat. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2015;(9):CD010198Google ScholarPubMed
Whitcroft, KL, Loh, W, Joseph, T. ENT junior on calls: the role of education in cross covering. Br J Surg 2015;102:228Google Scholar
Wong, PY, Singh, A. Simulation can cultivate medical students' interest in ENT surgery. Br J Surg 2015;102:203–4Google Scholar
Al-Hussaini, A, Tomkinson, A. Exploring medical undergraduates' perceptions of the educational value of a novel ENT iBook: a qualitative study. J Vis Commun Med 2016;39:3–9CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Easto, RH, Reddy, V. A survey of ENT experience in South West Peninsula general practitioner trainees: how can post-graduate ENT training be improved? J Laryngol Otol 2016;130:893–6CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hunter, I, Ramanathan, V, Balasubramanian, P, Evans, DA, Hardman, JG, McCahon, RA. Retention of laryngoscopy skills in medical students: a randomised, cross-over study of the Macintosh, A.P. Advance(™), C-MAC(®) and Airtraq(®) laryngoscopes. Anaesthesia 2016;71:1191–7CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Steven, R, Mires, G, Lloyd, S, Jones, S, Spielmann, P, McAleer, S. Otological aspects of undergraduate otolaryngology education in the United Kingdom. J Laryngol Otol 2016;130:S235CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Musbahi, O, Aydin, A, Al Omran, Y, Skilbeck, CJ, Ahmed, K. Current status of simulation in otolaryngology: a systematic review. J Surg Educ 2017;74:203–15CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Steven, RA, Mires, GJ, Lloyd, SKW, McAleer, S. An undergraduate otolaryngology curriculum comparison in the United Kingdom using a curriculum evaluation framework. Clin Otolaryngol 2017;42:963–8CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jia, W, Al-Omari, B. A versatile grommet trainer. Clin Teach 2019;16:78–80CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Spiers, H, Enayati, H, Moussa, R, Zargaran, A, Thomas, A, Murtaza, A et al. Augmenting ENT surgery outside the medical school curriculum: the role of a 1-day otolaryngology course. J Laryngol Otol 2019;133:269–74CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sterne, JA, Hernan, MA, Reeves, BC, Savovic, J, Berkman, ND, Viswanathan, M et al. ROBINS-I: a tool for assessing risk of bias in non-randomised studies of interventions. BMJ 2016;355:i4919CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sterne, JAC, Savovic, J, Page, MJ, Elbers, RG, Blencowe, NS, Boutron, I et al. RoB 2: a revised tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials. BMJ 2019;366:l4898CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fung, K. Otolaryngology--head and neck surgery in undergraduate medical education: advances and innovations. Laryngoscope 2015;125(suppl 2):S1–14CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Evans, DJR, Cuffe, T. Near-peer teaching in anatomy: an approach for deeper learning. Anat Sci Educ 2009;2:227–33CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kyle, B. Competency crisis facing the NHS. BMJ Careers 2007;110:47–8Google Scholar
Nagendran, M, Gurusamy, KS, Aggarwal, R, Loizidou, M, Davidson, BR. Virtual reality training for surgical trainees in laparoscopic surgery. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2013;(8):CD006575Google ScholarPubMed
Zendejas, B, Brydges, R, Hamstra, SJ, Cook, DA. State of the evidence on simulation-based training for laparoscopic surgery: a systematic review. Ann Surg 2013;257:586–93CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Supplementary material: File

Yip et al. supplementary material

Appendices

Download Yip et al. supplementary material(File)
File 81.4 KB