Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-l7hp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T09:26:45.890Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Contribution to a Discussion on Nasal Allergy (Excluding Hay Fever)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 June 2007

Cyril Polson
Affiliation:
Leeds

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © JLO (1984) Limited 1943

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adam, J., Asthma and its radical treatment, 1926, 2nd edn.Kimpton, London.Google Scholar
Alyea, O. E. Van, “Nasal Sinuses: an anatomic and clinical consideration,” 1942. Wilkins, Baltimore.Google Scholar
Barber, H. W. and Oriel, G. H., Lancet, 1928, ii, 10091013.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beckman, H., J. Allergy, 19291930, 1, 496500.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bezançon, F. and Bernard, E., Ann. de méd., 1930, xxvii, 204–33.Google Scholar
Black, J. H., Texas State J. Med., 19331934, xxix, 257–60.Google Scholar
Blackley, C. H., “Experimental researches on the causes and nature of catarrhus aestivus,” 1873. Baillière, Tindall & Cox, London.Google Scholar
Bostock, J., Med.-Chi. Trans. Lond., 1819, x, 161–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bostock, J., Med.-Chi. Trans. Lond., 1828, xiv, 437–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bray, G. W., Quart. J. Med., 19301931, xxiv, 181–97.Google Scholar
Bray, G. W., “Recent advances in allergy,” 1937, 3rd edition. Churchill, London.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brodie, T. G. and Dixon, W. E., Trans. Path. Soc. Lond., 19021903, liv, 1739.Google Scholar
Brodie, T. G. and Dixon, W. E., also abstract B.M.J., 1929, ii, 6870.Google Scholar
Buhrmester, C. C., Laryngoscope, 1935, xlv, 347–54.Google Scholar
Cameron, H. C., B.M.J., 1929, i, 185–7.Google Scholar
Cameron, J. A. M., J. Laryng. and Otol., 1935, 1, 493511.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Criep, L. H., J. Allergy, 19311932, iii, 219–26.Google Scholar
Criep, L. H. and Mcelroy, W. S., Arch. intern. Med., 1928, xlii, 865–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dixon, W. E. and Brodie, T. G., J. Physiol., 1903, xxix, 97173.Google Scholar
Eggston, A. A., “Surgery of the nose and throat,” 1942, chapter viii, edited by Kernan, J. D.Thos. Nelson, New York and London : review B.M.J., 1943, i, 383 (“The masterpiece in the book ”).Google Scholar
Ehrlich, . Cited by Opie.Google Scholar
Ehrmann, , 1918 and 1922. Cited by Loveless.Google Scholar
Elliotson, J., Lond. Med. Gaz., 1831, viii, 411–16.Google Scholar
Ewing, J., “Neoplastic taseases,” 1940, 4th edition. Saunders, Philad. and London.Google Scholar
Fogelson, S. J., J. Amer. med. Ass., 1931, xcvi, 673–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Francis, A., Lancet, 1902, ii, 1053–4.Google Scholar
Francis, A., B.M.J., 1904, ii, 1231–7.Google Scholar
Gillespie, M., B.M.J., 1930, i, 1139.Google Scholar
Gillespie, M., Quart. J. Med., 1935, N.S. iv, 397405.Google Scholar
Grant, J. Dundas, Practitioner, 1913, xc, 914–23.Google Scholar
SirGrant, J. Dundas, B.M.J., 1931, li, 1127–39.Google Scholar
Haas, R., Folia Oto-laryng. Orient., 1935, ii, 304–21.Google Scholar
Hansel, F. K., J. Allergy, 19291930, i, 4370.Google Scholar
Harris, H. E. and Thomas, J. W., “Allergy in Clinical Practice,” 1941, edited by Haden, R. L. and Thomas, J. W., Lippincott, Philad., pp. 5873.Google Scholar
Harrison, G. A., “Chemical methods in clinical medicine,” 1939, 2nd edition. Churchill, London.Google Scholar
Haseltine, B., Illinois Med. J., 1928, liv, 417–21.Google Scholar
Heineke, A. and Deutschmann, FR., Münch. med. Wschr., 1906, liii, 797–8.Google Scholar
Heymann, , cited by Yonge, 1907.Google Scholar
Howarth, W., J. Laryng. and Otol., 1933, xlviii, 247–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huber, H. L., and Koessler, K. K., Arch. Intern. Med., 1922, xxx, 689760.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hurwitz, S. H., J. Allergy, 19291930, i, 245–59.Google Scholar
Kelly, D. B., J. Laryng. and Otol., 1935, I, 444–6.Google Scholar
Kirkman, W. P., cited by Hurwitz, from Phæbus.Google Scholar
Knott, F. A., Oriel, G. H., and Witts, L. J., Guys' Host. Rep., 1930, lxxx, 429–30.Google Scholar
Köster, , Berl. klin. Wschr., 1881, p. 526; cited by Yonge, E. S.; B.M.J., 1907, ii, 968.Google Scholar
Loveless, M., J. Allergy, 19351936, vii, 203–23.Google Scholar
Maceenzie, J. N., Amer. J. med. Sci., 1883, lxxxvi, 106–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mackenzie, Morell, “A manual of diseases of the throat and nose,” 1884, ii, 299et seq. Churchill, London.Google Scholar
Malone, J. T., U.S. Vet. Bur. Med. Bull., 1929, v, 285–8.Google Scholar
Müller, and Rieder, , Dtsch. Arch. klin. Med., 1891, xlviii, 47, cited by Opie.Google Scholar
Mullin, and Ball, , cited by Schall.Google Scholar
Murdoce, B., J. Laryng., klin. and Otol., 1894, viii, 619–23.Google Scholar
Murdoch, F. H., N.Y. St. J. Med., 1901, lxxiii, 5860.Google Scholar
Neale, A. V., Arch. Dis. Childh., 1930, v, 137–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Opie, E. L., Amer. J. med. Sci., 1904, cxxvii, 217–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Osman, A. A., Lancet, 1929, ii, 1187–8.Google Scholar
Payne, and Bray, , in “Bray's Recent Advances in Allergy,” 1937, 3rd edition. Churchill, London.Google Scholar
Peshein, M. M., J. Amer. med. Ass., 1920, lxxv, 1133.Google Scholar
Phœbus, P., Der Tyische Frühsommer Katarrh, Giessen, 1862; cited by Hurwitz.Google Scholar
Pickworth, F. A., J. Laryng. and Otol., 1932, xlvii, 759–61.Google Scholar
Piceworth, , “Chronic nasal sinusitis, etc.” 1935. H. K. Lewis & Co., London.Google Scholar
Polson, C. J., Brit. J. exp. Path., 1933a, xiv, 2432.Google Scholar
Polson, C. J., Brit. J. exp. Path., 1933b, xiv, 125–32.Google Scholar
Polson, C. J., J. Laryng. and Otol., 1942, lvii, 416–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Poulsson, E., Med. Soc. Christiana, 1895, per report in J. Laryng. Rhin. and Otol., 1896, xi, 114.Google Scholar
Ringer, , 1864, cited by Bray, 1937.Google Scholar
Sajous, C. E., Ann. Univ. Med. Sci., 1895, iv.Google Scholar
Salter, H. H., “On asthma: its pathology and treatment,” 1864, cited by Hurwitz.Google Scholar
Schall, Le Roy A., Ann. Otol., Rhin. and Laryng., 1933, xlii, 1538.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scheppegrell, , Med. J. and Rec., 1925, cxxi, 660, cited by Hurwitz.Google Scholar
Spiethoff, , 1908, cited by Loveless.Google Scholar
Vanzant, F. R., Alvarez, W. C., Berkson, J. and Eusterman, G. B., Arch. intern. Med., 1933, lii, 616–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Voltolini, R., “Die Anwendung de Galvanokaustik,” 1871, 2nd edition, pp. 246 and 312. Braumüller, Wien.Google Scholar
Wagner, W. A., Texas State J. Med., 19331934, xxix, 329.Google Scholar
Walsue, , 1854, cited by Bray, 1937.Google Scholar
Watkyn-Thomas, F. W., Medical Annual, 1939, lvii, 338.Google Scholar
Watson, , 1857, cited by Bray, 1937.Google Scholar
Williams, Watson, B.M.J., 1907, ii, 968.Google Scholar
Williamson, G. Scott, J. Laryng. and Otol., 1932, xlvii, 667–72.Google Scholar
Wright, C. B., Arch. intern. Med., 1924, xxxiii, 435–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yonge, E. S., “Polypus of the nose,” 1906. Skerratt & Hughes, London.Google Scholar
Yonge, E. S., B.M.J., 1907, ii, 964–8.Google Scholar
Zuckerkandl, E., “Normale u. path. Anat. der Nasenhöhle,” etc., 1892, ii Braumüller, Wien; and the French translation by Lichtwitz and Garnault, 1895. Masson, Paris.Google Scholar