Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-q99xh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T06:07:53.208Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Cochlear implants for mumps deafness: two paediatric cases

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 February 2015

T Noda*
Affiliation:
Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kyushu University, Fukuoka, Japan
Y Kakazu
Affiliation:
Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Japanese Red Cross Fukuoka Hospital, Fukuoka, Japan
S Komune
Affiliation:
Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kyushu University, Fukuoka, Japan
*
Address for correspondence: T Noda, Department of Otolaryngology – Head and Neck Surgery, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kyushu University, 3-1-1 Maidashi, Higashi-ku, Fukuoka 812-8582, Japan Fax: +81 92 642 5685 E-mail: [email protected]

Abstract

Background:

Good outcomes have been reported regarding the use of cochlear implants for mumps deafness. The mumps virus induces meningitis and/or encephalitis, which can cause central nervous system damage resulting in retrolabyrinthine hearing loss, for which a cochlear implant would be less effective.

Cases:

We installed a cochlear implant in two patients with bilateral mumps deafness; one achieved a good result with the cochlear implant, but the other did not. We discuss two possible reasons for the different outcomes. Case 1 was a three-year-old girl with bilateral parotid swelling, vomiting and walking disorder. One year after cochlear implant insertion, speech perception did not develop despite of good pure tone thresholds. Case 2 was an eight-year-old girl with bilateral parotid swelling. A cochlear implant enabled her to improve hearing perception.

Conclusion:

Although cochlear implants have been reported to be helpful for mumps deafness, cases that involve central nervous system damage may not achieve good results.

Type
Main Articles
Copyright
Copyright © JLO (1984) Limited 2015 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1Pomeroy, C, Jordan, MC. Mumps: Infectious Diseases, 5th edn.Philadelphia, Lippineott Company, 1955Google Scholar
2Everberg, G. Deafness following mumps. Acta Otolaryngol 1957;48:397403CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
3Kawaguchi, S, Kawano, A, Kanebayashi, H, Oura, N, Suzuki, M. Case reports of mumps deafness [in Japanese]. Practica Oto-Rhino-Laryngologica 2003;96:865–9Google Scholar
4Saka, N, Adachi, O, Okunaka, M, Tsuji, K, Sakagami, M. A case of bilateral deafness due to mumps [in Japanese]. Practica Oto-Rhino-Laryngologica 2004;97:197200CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5Kikuta, S, Kumakawa, K, Yamane, M, Tokunaga, E. Two cases of effective cochlear implantations for deafness following mumps [in Japanese]. Practica Oto-Rhino-Laryngologica 2004;97:681–4Google Scholar
6Yamada, C, Yamasoba, T, Kaga, K. A case report in Otology Japan. Otol Jpn 2002;12:269Google Scholar
7Honjo, I. Language in cochlear implant users. Japan Journal of Logopedics and Phoniatrics 2001;42:205–12CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8Naito, Y. Development and plasticty of the auditory cortex. Japan Journal of Logopedics and Phoniatrics 2001;42:264–71CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9Geers, AE. Speech, language, and reading skills after early cochlear implantation. Arch Otol Head Neck Surg 2004;130:634–5Google Scholar
10Mizushima, N, Murakami, Y. Deafness following mumps: the possible pathogenesis and incidence of deafness. Auris Nasus Larynx 1986;13:55–7CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
11Lindsay, JR. Histopathology of deafness due to postnatal viral disease. Arch Otolaryngol 1973;98:258–64CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
12Tanaka, K, Fukuda, S, Terayama, Y, Toriyama, M, Ishidoya, J, Ito, T et al. Experimental mumps labyrinthitis in monkeys (Macaca irus) – immunohistochemical and ultrastructual studies. Auris Nasus Larynx 1988;15:8996CrossRefGoogle Scholar
13Hviid, A, Rubin, S, Muhlemann, K. Mumps. Lancet 2008;371:932–44CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed