Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dk4vv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-29T01:44:19.538Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Cochlear implantation under local anaesthesia, the Belfast experience

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 June 2007

J. G. Toner*
Affiliation:
Northern Ireland Regional Cochlear Implant Centre, Middle Dufferin, Belfast City Hospital, Belfast, Northern Ireland.
G. John
Affiliation:
Northern Ireland Regional Cochlear Implant Centre, Middle Dufferin, Belfast City Hospital, Belfast, Northern Ireland.
E. J. McNaboe
Affiliation:
Northern Ireland Regional Cochlear Implant Centre, Middle Dufferin, Belfast City Hospital, Belfast, Northern Ireland.
*
Address for correspondence: Mr J. G. Toner, F.R.C.S., Consultant Otolaryngologist, Regional Cochlear Implant Centre, Middle Dufferin, Belfast City Hospital, Lisburn Road, Belfast BT9 7AB. Fax: 01232 263549

Abstract

The profoundly deaf, who gain little or no benefit from conventional hearing aids and meet various criteria are potential candidates for cochlear implantation. The last two decades have witnessed remarkable progress in this field, and it is now a routine clinical procedure. A few adult patients who are potential candidates for cochlear implantation have an unacceptably high risk for hypotensive general anaesthesia due to other systemic conditions. This group has been successfully implanted under local anaesthesia in our centre. The post-implantation progress of these patients was comparable to those carried out under hypotensive general anaesthesia. Data regarding patient selection criteria, examination, anaesthesia, surgery and the outcome are discussed. It was concluded that cochlear implantation under local anaesthesia is a safe and effective procedure for those patients who otherwise may be denied an implant.

Type
Main Articles
Copyright
Copyright © JLO (1984) Limited 1998

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Clark, G. M., Cohen, N. L., Shepherd, R. K. (1991) Surgical and safety considerations of multichannel cochlear implants in children. Ear and Hearing 12 (Suppl): 15S24S.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gantz, M. D., McCabe, B. F., Tyler, R. S. (1988) Use of multichannel cochlear implants in obstructed and obliterated cochleas. Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery 98: 7281.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gibson, W. P. R., Harrison, H. C., Prowse, C. (1995) A new incision for the placement of the ‘cochlear’ multichannel cochlear implant. Journal of Laryngology and Otology 109: 821825.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Graham, J. M., East, C. A., Fraser, J. G. (1989) UCH/RNID single-channel cochlear implant: surgical technique. Journal of Laryngology and Otology 103 (Suppl 18): 1419.Google Scholar
Lawson, J. T., McNaboe, E. J., Cranley, K., Toner, J. G. (1996) Digital imaging in the post-operative assessment of cochlear implantation. British Journal of Radiology 69 (Suppl 9).Google Scholar
Luxford, W. M., House, W. F. (1987) House 3M cochlear implant: surgical considerations. Annals of Otology, Rhinology and Laryngology 96 (Suppl 128): 1214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martin, C., Navez, M., Baylot, D., Pradesh, J. M. (1989) Deafness surgery in adults. The growing role of improved local anaesthesia. Annales d Oto-Laryngologie et de chirugie cervico-Faciale 106(1): 6567.Google Scholar
Phelps, P. D., Annis, A. D., Robinson, P. J. (1990) Imaging for cochlear implants. British Journal of Radiology 63: 512516.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Yung, M. W. (1996) Local anaesthesia in middle ear surgery: survey of patients and surgeons. Clinical Otolaryngology 21: 404408.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zhao, F., Stephens, S. D., Sim, S. W., Meredith, R. (1997) The use of qualitative questionnaires in patients having and being considered for cochlear implants. Clinical Otolaryngology 22(3): 254259.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed