Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-g8jcs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T15:14:14.910Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Coblation of rhinophyma

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 April 2011

M Timms
Affiliation:
Department of Otolaryngology, Royal Blackburn Infirmary, UK
A Roper*
Affiliation:
Department of Otolaryngology, Royal Blackburn Infirmary, UK
C Patrick
Affiliation:
Department of Otolaryngology, Royal Blackburn Infirmary, UK
*
Address for correspondence: Ms Alexandra Roper, Westlands, 119 New Hall Lane, Heaton, Bolton BL1 5HQ, UK E-mail: [email protected]

Abstract

Introduction:

Rhinophyma is a disfiguring hypertrophy of the skin of the tip of the nose.

Objective:

To assess the new technique of coblation of rhinophyma.

Study design:

Case series of six patients.

Results:

All patients had a good cosmetic result. Comparison with existing techniques showed advantages due to the lower tissue temperature involved.

Conclusion:

Coblation of rhinophyma is an effective treatment with few side effects.

Type
Short Communications
Copyright
Copyright © JLO (1984) Limited 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1Redett, J, Manson, P, Goldberg, N, Girotto, J, Spence, R. Methods and results of rhinophyma treatment. Plast Reconstr Surg 2001;107:1115–23CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
2Fincher, EF, Gladstone, HB. Use of dual-mode erbium:YAG laser for the surgical correction of rhinophyma. Arch Facial Plast Surg 2004;6:267–71CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
3Shatokhina, SN, Chumakov, FI, Deriugina, OV. On rhinophyma and its cytological characteristics. Vestn Otorinolaringol 1999;3:50–1Google Scholar
4Aferzon, M, Millman, B. Excision of rhinophyma with high-frequency electrosurgery. Dermatol Surg 2002;28:735–8Google ScholarPubMed
5Sorhage, B, Glowania, HJ. Rhinophyma – conservative or surgical treatment? [in German] Fortschr Med 1991;109:110–12Google ScholarPubMed
6Payne, WG, Ko, F, Ansoaugh, S, Wheeler, CK, Wright, TE, Robson, MN. Down-regulating causes of fibrosis with tamoxifen: a possible cellular/molecular approach to treat rhinophyma. Ann Plast Surg 2006;56:301–5CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
7Rohrich, RJ, Griffin, J, Adams, WP. Rhinophyma: review and update. Plast Reconstr Surg 2002;110:860–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8Kaushik, V, Tahery, J, Malik, TH, Jones, PH. New surgical adjuncts in the treatment of rhinophyma: the microdebrider and FloSeal. J Laryngol Otol 2003;117:551–2CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
9Jung, H. Rhinophyma: plastic surgery, rehabilitation and long-term results. Facial Plast Surg 1998;14:255–78CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
10Cervelli, V, Giudiceandrea, F, Pigliucci, GM, Maggiulli, G, Grimaldi, M, Cervelli, G et al. Surgical treatment of rhinophyma using dermo-epidermal graft [in Italian]. A case report. Minerva Chir 1997;52:301–5Google ScholarPubMed
11Szymanska-Skrzypek, A, Burduk, PK, Betlejewski, S. Rhinophyma – diagnosis and treatment [in Polish]. Otolaryngol Pol 2005;59:581–4Google ScholarPubMed
12Lim, RY. Contact Nd:YAG laser excision of rhinophyma. W V Med J 1994;90:62–3Google ScholarPubMed
13Bogetti, P, Boltri, M, Spagnoli, G, Dolcet, M. Surgical treatment of rhinophyma: a comparison of techniques. Aesth Plast Surg 2002;26:5760CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
14Gjuric, M, Rettinger, G. Comparison of carbon dioxide laser and electrocautery in the treatment of rhinophyma. Rhinology 1993;31:37–9Google ScholarPubMed
15Gupta, S, Handa, S, Saraswat, A, Kumar, B. Conventional cold excision combined with dermabrasion for rhinophyma. J Dermatol 2000;27:116–20CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
16Har-El, G, Shapshay, SM, Bohigian, RK, Krespi, YP, Lucente, FE. The treatment of rhinophyma. ‘Cold’ vs laser techniques. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1993;119:628–31CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
17Hetherington, HE. Coblation-assisted decortication for the treatment of rhinophyma. Laryngoscope 2009;119:1082–4CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed