Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2plfb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T23:42:28.289Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A British experience of surgical voice restoration techniques as a secondary procedure following total laryngectomy

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 June 2007

Alison Perry ,
A. D. Cheesman ,
J. McIvor  and
Rosemary Chalton
Alison Perry*
Affiliation:
Department of Speech Therapy.
A. D. Cheesman
Affiliation:
Department of Head and Neck/ENT Surgery.
J. McIvor
Affiliation:
Department of Radiology.
Rosemary Chalton
Affiliation:
Department of Head and Neck/ENT Surgery.
*
Mrs Alison Perry, Chief Speech Therapist, Charing Cross Hospital, Fulham Palace Road, London W6 8RF.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An earlier paper (Cheesman et al., 1985) described assessment procedures for ‘failed’ oesophageal speakers who were referred to Charing Cross Hospital for possible Surgical Voice Restoration in 1983–4.

This paper presents the results of surgical voice restoration in the first fifty laryngectomized patients referred and analyses the reasons for failure in those where surgical voice restoration was unsuccessful.

94 per cent of patients who underwent secondary voice restoration were successful at two weeks post-surgery, but this success rate dropped to 73 per cent at three months. Reasons for this are explained and the pre-requisites for a successful surgical voice restoration are indicated.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Journal of Laryngology & Otology , Volume 101 , Issue 2 , February 1987 , pp. 155 - 163
Copyright
Copyright © JLO (1984) Limited 1987

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Cheesman, A. D., Knight, J., McIvor, J. and Perry, A. (1985) Assessment procedures for post-laryngectomy patients who desire surgical voice restoration. Journal of Laryngology and Otology, In press.Google Scholar
Hunt, R. B. (1964) Rehabilitation of the laryngectomee. Laryngoscope, 74: 382–395.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
King, P. S., Fowlks, E. W. and Pierson, G. A. (1968) Rehabilitation and adaptation of laryngectomy patients. American Journal of Physical Medicine, 47: 192–203.Google ScholarPubMed
Logemann, J. (1983) Vocal rehabilitation after extensive surgery for post-cricoid carcinoma in ‘laryngectomy: diagnosis to rehabilitation’, Ed. Edels, Y.Croom-Helm, pp. 233–248.Google Scholar
Panje, W. R. (1981) Prosthetic voice rehabilitation following laryngectomy: The voice button. Annals of Otology, Rhinology and Laryngology, 90: 116–120.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Singer, M. I. and Blom, E. D. (1980) An endoscopic technique for restoration of voice after laryngectomy. Annals of Otology, Rhinology and Laryngology 89:CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Singer, M. I. and Blom, E. D. (1981) Selective myotomy for voice restoration after total laryngectomy. Archives of Otolaryngology, 107:Google ScholarPubMed
Taub, S. and Bugner, L. H. (1973) Air bypass voice prosthesis for vocal rehabilitation of laryngectomees. American Journal of Surgery, 125: 748–756.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Weinberg, B., Horie, Y., Blom, E. and Singer, M. (1982) Airway resistance during esophageal phonation. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 47: 194–199.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wepman, J. M., MacGahan, J. M., Rickard, J. C. and Shelton, W. W. (1953) The objective measure of progressive oesophageal Speech Development. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 18: 247–251.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed