Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-vdxz6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T11:44:18.209Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Auditory brain stem responses (ABR) in patients with acute severe closed head injuries

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 June 2007

Samy Elwany
Samy Elwany*
Affiliation:
Consultant Otolaryngologist, Dr. Fakhry Hospital, P.O. Box 251, Alkhobar, Saudi Arabia Assistant Professor, Alexandria Medical School, Alexandria, Egypt.
*
Samy Elwany, M.D., Dr. Fakhry Hospital, P.O. Box 251, Alkhobar, Saudi Arabia.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

ABR were recorded in 68 cases suffering from severe acute closed head injuries. Abnormal recordings were observed in 60 per cent of patients, and the abnormalities ranged from prolongation of the interpeak latency intervals to complete absence of auditory brain stem activity. Based on the results obtained, a grading system was developed and correlated with the neurological outcome. It was concluded that ABR is a useful diagnostic and prognostic tool which can provide valuable information about the function of the brain stem in these patients. Inclusion of ABR studies in the head injury management protocol is strongly recommended.

Type
Main Articles
Information
The Journal of Laryngology & Otology , Volume 102 , Issue 9 , September 1988 , pp. 755 - 759
Copyright
Copyright © JLO (1984) Limited 1988

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Barber, H. O. (1969) Head injury—Audiological and vestibular findings. Annals of Otology, Rhinology and Laryngology, 78: 239–252.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Braakmann, R., Glepke, G. J., Habbema, J. D., Maas, A. and Minderhaud, J. (1980) Systematic selection of prognostic features in patients with severe head injury. Neurosurgery 6: 362–370.Google Scholar
Clifton, G. L., Grossman, R. G., Makela, M. E. and Richling, B. (1980) Neurologic course and correlated computerized tomography findings after severe closed head injury. Journal of Neurosurgery, 18: 114–119.Google Scholar
Ducanti, A. (1985) Prognostic use of evoked potentials in acute traumatic coma. Hospital Medica, 5: 32–38.Google Scholar
Eggermont, J. J., Don, M. and Brackman, D. E. (1980) Elec-trochochleography and auditory brain stem electric responses in patients with cerebellopontine angle tumors. Annals ofOtology, Rhinology and Laryngology Suppl. 89: p.75.Google Scholar
Elwany, S. (1985). Brain stem auditory evoked potentials in patients with the lateral medullary (Wallenberg's) syndrome. ORL, 47: 90–94.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Greenberg, R. P., Mayer, R. J., Becker, D. P. and Narayan, K. (1977) Evaluation of brain function in severe head trauma with multimodality evoked potential. Journal of Neurosurgery, 47: 150–162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greenberg, R. P., Newlon, P. G., Hyatt, M. S., Narayan, K., Becker, D and Rantanen, T. (1981) Prognostic implications of early multimodality evoked potentials in severe head-injured patients. Journal of Neurosurgery 55: 227–236.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hall, J. W., Huang-fu, M. and Gennarelli, T. A. (1982) Auditory functions in acute severe head injury. Laryngoscope, 92: 883–889.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hall, J. W., Huang-fu, M., Gennarelli, T. A. and Miller, G. (1983) Auditory evoked responses, impedance measures and diagnostic speech audiometry in severe head injury. Otolaryngology—Head and Neck Surgery, 91: 50–60.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jennett, B. and Bond, M. (1975) Assessment of outcome after severe brain damage: a practical scale. Lancet, 1: 480–484.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jewett, D. L. (1970) Volume-conducted potentials in response to auditory stimuli as detected by averaging in the cat. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, 28: 609–618.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Moller, A. R. (1980) A digital filter for brain stem evoked responses. American Journal of Otolaryngology, 1: 273–277.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Moller, M. B. and Moller, A. R. (1983) Brain stem auditory evoked potentials in patients with cerebellopontine angle tumors. Annals of Otology, Rhinology and Laryngology, 92: 645–649.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Narayan, R. R., Greenberg, R. P., Miller, J. D., Enas, G., Choi, S., Kishore, P., Selhorst, J., Lutz, H. and Becker, D. (1981) Improved confidence of outcome predictions in severe head injury. Journal of Neurosurgery, 54: 751–762.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ottaviani, F., Almadori, G., Calderozzo, A. B. and Geraldo., N. (1986) Auditory brain stem and middle latency auditory responses in the prognosis of severely head-injured patients. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, 65: 196–202.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Plum, F. and Posner, J. (1972) The diagnosis of stupor and coma, 1st edn., Davis, F. A.Philadelphia, pp. 35–54.Google ScholarPubMed
Rantanen, T., Anataa, E., Solmolli, A. and Carlin, N. (1967) Audiometric and electronystagmographic studies of patients with traumatic skull injuries. Ada Otolaryngologica, Suppl., 224: 256–259.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stockard, J. J. and Rossiter, V. S. (1977) Clinical and pathologic correlates of brain stem auditory abnormalities. Neurosurgery, 27: 316–325.Google Scholar