Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rdxmf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T03:24:17.201Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Audiometric screening and education for ENT emergencies

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 March 2019

Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Type
Editorial
Copyright
Copyright © JLO (1984) Limited, 2019 

‘Global medicine’ is currently fashionable, but has been an interest of this journal and its editors for many years, and has latterly been supported by regular meetings under the umbrella of ENT-UK. This issue contains a review that compares portable audiometric screening equipment suitable for use in low- and medium-income countries (previously, ‘the developing world’).Reference Jayawardena, Waller, Edwards, Larsen-Reindorf, Esinam Anomah and Frimpong1 This complements accounts by Swanepoel and Clark,Reference Swanepoel and Clark2 and Bhutta,Reference Bhutta3 which appeared in the most recent issue of The Journal of Laryngology & Otology, and set the scene and context of such work. This article should be of practical help to anyone with an interest in helping patients in such environments.

Dealing with a difficult emergency in otorhinolaryngology, out of normal working hours, with limited support, for the first time, undoubtedly concentrates the mind. Unfortunately, it is not an ideal learning environment, nor is it ideal if we are to achieve optimal patient outcomes. Simulation offers a more controlled environment, allows for detailed feedback and interactive learning, and can address both technical and non-technical aspects of this high-pressure work. We publish in this issue a paper by Hogg and colleagues from North West EnglandReference Hogg, Kinshuck, Littley, Lau, Tandon and Lancaster4 that describes in detail their experience of several rounds of an evolving emergency course, in which eight simulation scenarios have been developed. The course was open to junior and more senior trainees, as well as advanced nurse practitioners in ENT, and had impressive outcomes. This should be of interest to anyone with teaching or service-delivery responsibilities. It also complements other education-related articles published recently in The Journal,Reference Clark, Westerberg, Nakku and Carling5, Reference Hardcastle and Wood6 including research on virtual reality simulation for medical students. The days of ‘see one, do one, teach one’ are long gone, thankfully.

References

1Jayawardena, A, Waller, B, Edwards, B, Larsen-Reindorf, R, Esinam Anomah, J, Frimpong, B et al. Portable audiometric screening platforms used in low-resourced settings: a review. J Laryngol Otol 2019;133:74–9Google Scholar
2Swanepoel, D, Clark, JL. Hearing healthcare in remote or resource-constrained environments. J Laryngol Otol 2019;133:1117Google Scholar
3Bhutta, MF. Models of service delivery for ear and hearing care in remote or resource-constrained environments. J Laryngol Otol 2019;133:3948Google Scholar
4Hogg, ES, Kinshuck, AJ, Littley, N, Lau, A, Tandon, S, Lancaster, J. A high-fidelity, fully immersive simulation course to replicate ENT and head and neck emergencies. J Laryngol Otol 2019;133:115–8Google Scholar
5Clark, MPA, Westerberg, BD, Nakku, D, Carling, P. Education in ear and hearing care in remote or resource-constrained environments. J Laryngol Otol 2019;133:310Google Scholar
6Hardcastle, T, Wood, A. The utility of virtual reality surgical simulation in the undergraduate otorhinolaryngology curriculum. J Laryngol Otol 2018;132:744–51Google Scholar