Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dsjbd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T06:06:53.911Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Assessment of nasal functions and their relationship with cholesteatoma formation in patients with unilateral chronic otitis media

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 October 2018

F Arslan ,
M Binar  and
U Aydin
F Arslan*
Affiliation:
Department of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Beytepe Murat Erdi Eker State Hospital
M Binar
Affiliation:
Department of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Gulhane Medical School, Ankara, Turkey
U Aydin
Affiliation:
Department of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Gulhane Medical School, Ankara, Turkey
*
Author for correspondence: Dr Fatih Arslan, Dept. of Otolaryngology, Beytepe Murat Erdi Eker State Hospital, Beytepe 06500, Ankara, Turkey E-mail: [email protected] Fax: +90 31 2906 0814
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Objectives

To evaluate the nasal functions of patients with unilateral chronic otitis media using rhinomanometry, comparing chronic otitis media sides with healthy sides, chronic otitis media patients with cholesteatoma and without cholesteatoma, and patients with healthy individuals.

Methods

This prospective study included 102 patients with unilateral chronic otitis media (48 with and 54 without cholesteatoma). The control group comprised 40 individuals without any ear or nasal pathologies. All patients underwent active anterior rhinomanometry to measure nasal airway resistance and a saccharin test to measure mucociliary transport times.

Results

There were no significant differences in nasal airway resistance and mucociliary transport time between the chronic otitis media sides and unaffected sides in the 102 patients (p = 0.72 and p = 0.28, respectively), between the non-suppurative chronic otitis media patients (without cholesteatoma) and chronic otitis media with cholesteatoma patients (p > 0.05), or between the study and control groups (p > 0.05).

Conclusion

The present study, with a larger sample size compared to previously published literature, supports the conclusion that unilateral nasal obstruction is unlikely to lead to chronic otitis media on the same side. The results also suggest that nasal functions do not contribute to the development of cholesteatoma.

Keywords

Otitis MediaCholesteatomaNasal ObstructionRhinomanometrySaccharin
Type
Main Articles
Information
The Journal of Laryngology & Otology , Volume 132 , Issue 11 , November 2018 , pp. 974 - 977
Copyright
Copyright © JLO (1984) Limited, 2018 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

Dr F Arslan takes responsibility for the integrity of the content of the paper

References

1Doyle, WJ. Functional Eustachian tube obstruction and otitis media in a primate model. A review. Acta Otolaryngol Suppl 1984;414:52–7Google Scholar
2Cingi, C, Altin, F, Cakli, H, Entok, E, Gurbuz, K, Cingi, E. Scintigraphic evaluation of nasal mucociliary activity in unilateral chronic otitis media. J Laryngol Otol 2005;119:443–7Google Scholar
3Bakhshaee, M, Rajati, M, Fereidouni, M, Khadivi, E, Varasteh, A. Allergic rhinitis and chronic suppurative otitis media. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2011;268:87–91Google Scholar
4Parietti-Winkler, C, Baumann, C, Gallet, P, Gauchard, G, Jankowski, R. Otitis media with effusion as a marker of the inflammatory process associated to nasal polyposis. Rhinology 2009;47:396–9Google Scholar
5Salvinelli, F, Cásale, M, Greco, F, D'Ascanio, L, Petitti, T, Di Peco, V. Nasal surgery and eustachian tube function: effects on middle ear ventilation. Clin Otolaryngol 2005;30:409–13Google Scholar
6Hone, SW, Moodley, S, Donnelly, MJ, Fenton, JE, Gormley, PK, Walsh, M. The effect of tonsillectomy on eustachian tube function. Clin Otolaryngol Allied Sci 1997;22:511–14Google Scholar
7Buchman, CA, Doyle, WJ, Swarts, JD, Bluestone, CD. Effects of nasal obstruction on eustachian tube function and middle ear pressure. Acta Otolaryngol 1999;119:351–5Google Scholar
8Yilmaz, MS, Guven, M, Buyukarslan, DG, Kaymaz, R, Erkorkmaz, U. Do silicone nasal septal splints with integral airway reduce postoperative eustachian tube dysfunction? Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2012;146:141–5Google Scholar
9Clement, PA, Gordts, F; Standardisation Committee on Objective Assessment of the Nasal Airway, IRS, and ERS. Consensus report on acoustic rhinometry and rhinomanometry. Rhinology 2005;43:169–79Google Scholar
10Maier, W, Krebs, A. Is surgery of the inner nose indicated before tympanoplasty? Effects of nasal obstruction and reconstruction on the eustachian tube [in German]. Laryngorhinootologie 1998;77:682–8Google Scholar
11Low, WK, Willatt, DJ. The relationship between middle ear pressure and deviated nasal septum. Clin Otolaryngol Allied Sci 1993;18:308–10Google Scholar
12Filipović, SA, Janosević, L, Andrić, V, Ugrinović, A. Clinical evaluation of eustachian tube transience and function in patients with different types of increased nasal resistance [in Serbian]. Vojnosanit Pregl 2009;66:353–7Google Scholar
13Watson, C. Chronic otitis media: the significance of nasal obstruction. Clin Otolaryngol Allied Sci 1990;15:435–8Google Scholar
14Kurtgöz, S, Kökten, N, Tekin, M. Assessment of nasal airway resistances and nasal mucociliary activities of patients with unilateral chronic otitis media by acoustic rhinometry and saccharin test. Acta Otolaryngol 2014;134:898–903Google Scholar
15Güçlü, O, Sahin, EM, Tekin, K, Derekoy, FS. Evaluation of nasal airways by objective methods in chronic otitis media. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2013;270:1263–6Google Scholar
16Toros, SZ, Karaca, CT, Onder, S, Caypınar, B, Sahin-Yilmaz, A, Oysu, C. Nasal obstruction and unilateral chronic otitis media: evaluation by acoustic rhinometry. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 2013;122:734–6Google Scholar
17Tompos, T, Garai, T, Zemplen, B, Gerlinger, I. Sensation of nasal patency compared to rhinomanometric results after septoplasty. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2010;267:1887–91Google Scholar
18Hirschberg, A. Rhinomanometry: an update. ORL J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec 2002;64:263–7Google Scholar
19Cole, P, Fenton, RS. Contemporary rhinomanometry. J Otolaryngol 2006;35:83–7Google Scholar
20Arslan, F, Yildizoglu, U, Durmaz, A, Cetinkaya, S. Improving the rhinomanometry technique using benzoin tincture. J Laryngol Otol 2018;132:404–7Google Scholar