Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7fkt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T21:42:55.262Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Anatomical characteristics of the fossula fenestrae vestibuli

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 June 2007

D. Djerić*
Affiliation:
Belgrade, Yugoslavia
D. Savić
Affiliation:
Belgrade, Yugoslavia
*
Assistant Djeric, D., M.D., Ph.D., Clinic of Otolaryngology, Medical Faculty, University of Belgrade, 11000 Belgrade, Pasterova 2, Yugoslavia.

Abstract

Anatomical characteristics of the fossula fenestrae vestibuli were tested and analysed precisely on 200 samples of temporal bones. The fossula is usually ovoid and shallow but can be, exceptionally, elongated, narrow and deep. It is surrounded by four walls. In 45.5 per cent of cases the upper wall is formed only by the facial canal and in 54.5 per cent of cases a bony lamella is found beneath the facial canal; the promontory forms the lower wall; the front wall is formed by the bony lamella and part of the processus cochleariformis; the back wall is clearly defined in only 22.8 per cent of cases and is formed by the bony lamella of the medial wall of the tympanic cavity. In 13.2 per cent of cases the floor of the fossula partially covers the prominence of the facial canal and in two per cent the eminentia pyramidalis. Bony recesses in this region occur fairly frequently: sinus subfacialis in 60 per cent, sinus retrofenestralis in 77.2 per cent, and sinus subrostralis in 25 per cent of the cases. These anatomical variations can influence the result of surgical intervention.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © JLO (1984) Limited 1987

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Djerić, D. (1982) MorfoloŠke varijacije fossulae fenestrae vestibuli i njenog sadržaja i njihov klinički i hirurški značaj, Doktorska disertacija, Medicinski fakultet, Beograd, pp. 1111.Google Scholar
Djerić, D. and Savić, D. (1982) MorfoloSke varijacije gornjeg zida fossulae fenestrae vestibuli i njihov klinićki i hirurški znaćaj. Medicinska istraiivanja, 15: 11–15.Google Scholar
Djerić, D. and Savić, D. (1984) Anatomska i hirurska ispitivanja prednjeg i zadnjeg zida fossulae fenestrae vestibuli. Medicinska istražvanja, 17: 2529.Google Scholar
Mawson, S. and Ludman, H. (1979) Diseases of the ear, 4th edn. vol. 1. Textbook of Otology, Edward Arnold, London, pp. 1565.Google Scholar
Nager, G. and Proctor, B. (1982) Anatomical variations and anomalies involving the facial canal. Annals of Otology, Rhinology and Laryngology, 91: 4566.Google Scholar
Politzer, A. (1894) A textbook of the diseases of the ear and adjacent organs, Lea Brothers, Philadelphia.Google Scholar
Proctor, B. (1969) Surgical anatomy of the posterior tympanum. Annals of Otology, Rhinology and Laryngology, 78: 10261040.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Savić, D. and Djerić, D. (1985) Anatomical variations and relations of the stapes and the facial canal significant in surgery of Otosclerosis. Revue de Laryngologie, Otologie, Rhinologie, 106: 105108.Google Scholar
Savić, D., Radulović, R., Haralampiev, K., et al. (1980) Otoskleroza, Udruzenje otorinolaringologa Jugoslavije, Arandjelovac, pp. 1180.Google Scholar
Schuknecht, H. (1971) Anatomical variations and anomalies involving the facial canal. Journal of Laryngology and Otology, 85: 12381242.Google Scholar
SljiviĆ, B. (1969) Sistematska i topografska anatomija glave i vrata, Medicinska knjiga, Beograd-Zagreb, pp. 1450.Google Scholar
Spector, G. (1984) Developmental temporal bone anatomy and its clinical significance: Variations on themes by Schuknecht, H. Annals of Otology, Rhinology and Laryngology, Supplement 112, 93: 101112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Toldt, C. (1902) Systematischen und topographischen anatomie, Carl. v. Langer Lehrbuch Wien und Leipzig, Wilhem Braumuller.Google Scholar
Warwik, R. and Wiliams, P. (1973) Gray's Anatomy, Longman, pp. 524.Google Scholar