No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
An update on simulation training in rhinology: a systematic review of evidence
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 11 April 2024
Abstract
Background
Rhinological procedures demand a high degree of technical expertise and anatomical knowledge. Because of limited surgical opportunities, ethical considerations and the complexity of these procedures, simulation-based training has become increasingly important. This review aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of simulation models used in rhinology training.
Methods
Searches were conducted on PubMed, Embase, Cochrane and Google Scholar for studies conducted between July 2012 and July 2022. The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (‘PRISMA’) protocol defined a final list of articles. Each validated study was assigned a level of evidence and a level of recommendation based on the Oxford Centre of Evidence-Based Medicine classification.
Results
Following exclusions, 42 articles were identified which encompassed six types of simulation models and 26 studies evaluated validity. The rhinological skills assessed included endoscopic sinus surgery (n = 28), skull base/cerebrospinal fluid leak repair (n = 14), management of epistaxis and/or sphenopalatine artery ligation (n = 8), and septoplasty and septorhinoplasty (n = 6). All studies reported the beneficial impact of their simulation models on trainee development.
Conclusion
Simulation training in rhinology is a valuable adjunct to traditional surgical education. Although evidence is of moderate quality, the findings highlight the importance of simulation-based training in rhinology training.
- Type
- Main Article
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © The Author(s), 2024. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of J.L.O. (1984) LIMITED
Footnotes
Laura J Brennan takes responsibility for the integrity of the content of the paper
References
Pietersen, PI, Bjerrum, F, Tolsgaard, MG, Konge, L, Andersen, SAW. Standard setting in simulation-based training of surgical procedures: a systematic review. Ann Surg 2022;275:872–82CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Aydın, A, Ahmed, K, Abe, T, Raison, N, Van Hemelrijck, M, Garmo, H et al. Effect of simulation-based training on surgical proficiency and patient outcomes: a randomised controlled clinical and educational trial. Eur Urol 2022;81:385–93CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
de Montbrun, SL, MacRae, H. Simulation in surgical education. Clin Colon Rectal Surg 2012;25:156–65Google ScholarPubMed
Agha, RA, Fowler, AJ. The role and validity of surgical simulation. Int Surg 2015;100:350–7CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
The UK otolaryngology trainees’ lived experience during the COVID-19 pandemic. ENT & Audiology News. In: https://www.entandaudiologynews.com/development/trainee-matters/post/the-uk-otolaryngology-trainees-lived-experience-during-the-covid-19-pandemic [16 April 2023].Google Scholar
Oremule, B, Khwaja, S, Saleh, H. Overcoming challenges in septorhinoplasty training faced by UK otorhinolaryngology trainees. Bulletin of the Royal College of Surgeons of England 2021;103:212–17CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Balai, E, Jolly, K, Bhamra, N, Osborne, MS, Barraclough, J. The changing face of rhinology in the NHS: a study of septoplasty, septorhinoplasty and rhinoplasty hospital episode statistics. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 2021;103:291–5CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ashmore, DL. Strategic thinking to improve surgical training in the United Kingdom. Cureus 11:e4683Google Scholar
Musbahi, O, Aydin, A, Al Omran, Y, Skilbeck, CJ, Ahmed, K. Current status of simulation in otolaryngology: a systematic review. J Surg Educ 2017;74:203–15CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
OCEBM levels of evidence. In: https://www.cebm.ox.ac.uk/resources/levels-of-evidence/ocebm-levels-of-evidence [22 October 2023]Google Scholar
Carter, F, Schijven, M, Aggarwal, R, Grantcharov, T, Francis, N, Hanna, G et al. Consensus guidelines for validation of virtual reality surgical simulators. Surg Endosc 2006;19:1523–32CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chang, DR, Lin, RP, Bowe, S, Bunegin, L, Weitzel, EK, McMains, KC et al. Fabrication and validation of a low-cost, medium-fidelity silicone injection molded endoscopic sinus surgery simulation model. Laryngoscope 2017;127:781–6CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bright, RR, Varghese, L, Kurien, R. Construct and validation of a three-dimensional physical model for training in transnasal office procedures. Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2022;74:1638–45CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zhuo, C, Lei, L, Yulin, Z, Wentao, L, Shuangxia, W, Chao, W et al. Creation and validation of three-dimensional printed models for basic nasal endoscopic training. Int Forum Allergy Rhinol 2019;9:695–701CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Alwani, MM, Svenstrup, TJ, Bandali, EH, Sharma, D, Higgins, TS, Wu, AW et al. Validity testing of a three-dimensionally printed endoscopic sinonasal surgery simulator. Laryngoscope 2020;130:2748–53CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Yoshiyasu, Y, Chang, DR, Bunegin, L, Lin, RP, Aden, JK, Prihoda, TJ et al. Construct validity of a low-cost medium-fidelity endoscopic sinus surgery simulation model. Laryngoscope 2019;129:1505–9CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Varshney, R, Frenkiel, S, Nguyen, LHP, Young, M, Del Maestro, R, Zeitouni, A et al. The McGill simulator for endoscopic sinus surgery (MSESS): a validation study. J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2014;43:40CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Suzuki, M, Miyaji, K, Watanabe, R, Suzuki, T, Matoba, K, Nakazono, A et al. Repetitive simulation training with novel 3D-printed sinus models for functional endoscopic sinus surgeries. Laryngoscope Investig Otolaryngol 2022;7:943–54CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gillanders, SL, McHugh, A, Lacy, PD, Thornton, M. Safe surgical training: evaluation of a national functional endoscopic sinus surgery model simulation course using the Kirkpatrick evaluation model. Ir J Med Sci 2023;1–4Google ScholarPubMed
Richards, JP, Done, AJ, Barber, SR, Jain, S, Son, Y-J, Chang, EH. Virtual coach: the next tool in functional endoscopic sinus surgery education. Int Forum Allergy Rhinol 2020;10:97–102CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Barber, SR, Jain, S, Son, Y-J, Chang, EH. Virtual functional endoscopic sinus surgery simulation with 3D-printed models for mixed-reality nasal endoscopy. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2018;159:933–7CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chan, HHL, Siewerdsen, JH, Vescan, A, Daly, MJ, Prisman, E, Irish, JC. 3D rapid prototyping for otolaryngology-head and neck surgery: applications in image-guidance, surgical simulation and patient-specific modeling. PLoS One 2015;10:e0136370CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ahmad, JG, Citardi, AJ, Luong, AU, Yao, WC. Three-dimensional printed models to accelerate resident surgical learning curve for standard endoscopic sinus surgery techniques. Ear Nose Throat J 2022;1455613221120049CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cao, A, Feintuch, J, Feintuch, J, Tran, L, Senior, B, Yang, CJ. Advancing global medical education in otolaryngology through hands-on skills training and simulation-based learning. J Glob Health 11:03111CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harbison, RA, Johnson, KE, Miller, C, Sardesai, MG, Davis, GE. Face, content, and construct validation of a low-cost, non-biologic, sinus surgery task trainer and knowledge-based curriculum. Int Forum Allergy Rhinol 2017;7:405–13CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fortes, B, Balsalobre, L, Weber, R, Stamm, R, Stamm, A, Oto, F et al. Endoscopic sinus surgery dissection courses using a real simulator: the benefits of this training. Braz J Otorhinolaryngol 2016;82:26–32CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lindquist, NR, Leach, M, Simpson, MC, Antisdel, JL. Evaluating simulator-based teaching methods for endoscopic sinus surgery. Ear Nose Throat J 2019;98:490–5CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dharmawardana, N, Ruthenbeck, G, Woods, C, Elmiyeh, B, Diment, L, Ooi, EH et al. Validation of virtual-reality-based simulations for endoscopic sinus surgery. Clin Otolaryngol 2015;40:569–79CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Won, T-B, Hwang, P, Lim, JH, Cho, S-W, Paek, SH, Losorelli, S et al. Early experience with a patient-specific virtual surgical simulation for rehearsal of endoscopic skull-base surgery. Int Forum Allergy Rhinol 2018;8:54–63CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kim, DH, Kim, HM, Park, J-S, Kim, SW. Virtual reality haptic simulator for endoscopic sinus and skull base surgeries. J Craniofac Surg 2020;31:1811–14CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fried, MP, Sadoughi, B, Gibber, MJ, Jacobs, JB, Lebowitz, RA, Ross, DA et al. From virtual reality to the operating room: the endoscopic sinus surgery simulator experiment. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2010;142:202–7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stephenson, ED, Farquhar, DR, Masood, MM, Capra, G, Kimple, A, Ebert, CS et al. Blinded evaluation of endoscopic skill and instructability after implementation of an endoscopic simulation experience. Am J Rhinol Allergy 2019;33:681–90CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wais, M, Ooi, E, Leung, RM, Vescan, AD, Lee, J, Witterick, IJ. The effect of low-fidelity endoscopic sinus surgery simulators on surgical skill. Int Forum Allergy Rhinol 2012;2:20–6CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
ten Dam, E, Helder, HM, van der Laan, BFAM, Feijen, RA, Korsten-Meijer, AGW. The effect of three-dimensional visualisation on performance in endoscopic sinus surgery: a clinical training study using surgical navigation for movement analysis in a randomised crossover design. Clin Otolaryngol 2020;45:211–20CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dell'Era, V, Garzaro, M, Carenzo, L, Ingrassia, PL, Aluffi Valletti, P. An innovative and safe way to train novice ear nose and throat residents through simulation: the SimORL experience. Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital 2020;40:19–25CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Harbison, RA, Dunlap, J, Humphreys, IM, Davis, GE. Skills transfer to sinus surgery via a low-cost simulation-based curriculum. Int Forum Allergy Rhinol 2018;8:537–46CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sadeghnejad, S, Farahmand, F, Vossoughi, G, Moradi, H, Mousa Sadr Hosseini, S. Phenomenological tissue fracture modeling for an endoscopic sinus and skull base surgery training system based on experimental data. Med Eng Phys 2019;68:85–93CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Awad, Z, Touska, P, Arora, A, Ziprin, P, Darzi, A, Tolley, NS. Face and content validity of sheep heads in endoscopic rhinology training. Int Forum Allergy Rhinol 2014;4:851–8CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Touska, P, Awad, Z, Tolley, NS. Suitability of the ovine model for simulation training in rhinology. Laryngoscope 2013;123:1598–601CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
AlQahtani, A, Albathi, A, Castelnuovo, P, Alfawwaz, F. Cerebrospinal fluid leak repair simulation model: face, content, and construct validation. Am J Rhinol Allergy 2021;35:264–71CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Shen, J, Hur, K, Zhang, Z, Minneti, M, Pham, M, Wrobel, B et al. Objective validation of perfusion-based human cadaveric simulation training model for management of internal carotid artery injury in endoscopic endonasal sinus and skull base surgery. Oper Neurosurg (Hagerstown) 2018;15:231–8CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hsieh, T-Y, Cervenka, B, Dedhia, R, Strong, EB, Steele, T. Assessment of a patient-specific, 3-dimensionally printed endoscopic sinus and skull base surgical model. JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2018;144:574–9CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tai, BL, Wang, AC, Joseph, JR, Wang, PI, Sullivan, SE, McKean, EL et al. A physical simulator for endoscopic endonasal drilling techniques: technical note. J Neurosurg 2016;124:811–16CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
London, NR, Rangel, GG, VanKoevering, K, Zhang, A, Powell, AR, Prevedello, DM et al. Simulation of pediatric anterior skull base anatomy using a 3D printed model. World Neurosurg 2021;147:e405–10CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dias, LA, Gebhard, H, Mtui, E, Anand, VK, Schwartz, TH. The use of an ultraportable universal serial bus endoscope for education and training in neuroendoscopy. World Neurosurg 2013;79:337–40CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
AlQahtani, AA, Albathi, AA, Alhammad, OM, Alrabie, AS. Innovative real CSF leak simulation model for rhinology training: human cadaveric design. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2018;275:937–41CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cervenka, BP, Hsieh, T-Y, Lin, S, Bewley, A. Multi-institutional regional otolaryngology bootcamp. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 2020;129:605–10CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Malekzadeh, S, Deutsch, ES, Malloy, KM. Simulation-based otorhinolaryngology emergencies boot camp: Part 2: Special skills using task trainers. Laryngoscope 2014;124:1566–9CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
AlReefi, MA, Nguyen, LHP, Mongeau, LG, Haq, BU, Boyanapalli, S, Hafeez, N et al. Development and validation of a septoplasty training model using 3-dimensional printing technology. Int Forum Allergy Rhinol 2017;7:399–404CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rosenbaum, A, Faba, G, Varas, J, Andrade, T. Septoplasty training during the COVID-19 era: development and validation of a novel low-cost simulation model. OTO Open 2022;6:2473974X221128928CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ho, M, Goldfarb, J, Moayer, R, Nwagu, U, Ganti, R, Krein, H et al. Design and printing of a low-cost 3D-printed nasal osteotomy training model: development and feasibility study. JMIR Med Educ 2020;6:e19792CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Maloney, S, Haines, T. Issues of cost-benefit and cost-effectiveness for simulation in health professions education. Adv Simul 2016;1:13CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cardoso, SA, Suyambu, J, Iqbal, J, Cortes Jaimes, DC, Amin, A, Sikto, JT et al. Exploring the role of simulation training in improving surgical skills among residents: a narrative review. Cureus 15:e44654Google Scholar