Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-l7hp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T10:25:27.407Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

An approach to the audit of tinnitus management

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 June 2007

M. Sadlier  and
S. D. G. Stephens
M. Sadlier*
Affiliation:
Physiotherapy Department, University Hospital of Wales, Cardiff, UK.
S. D. G. Stephens
Affiliation:
Welsh Hearing Institute, University Hostpial of Wales, Cardiff, UK.
*
Mr Mike Sadlier, Department of Physiotherapy, University Hospital of Wales, Heath Park. Cardiff CF4 4XW.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This study examines the advantages and internal consistency of an open-ended queionnaire (Benefit problem questionnaire), over the Tinnitus questionnaire used by Jakes et al. (1985) in the auditing of a Stress management Programme.

This Tinnitus quesitionnaire showed very little difference pre- and post-treatment, while the Benefit/problem questionnarie showed good improvement over a number of variables. This included some of the more traditional orthogonal values of tinnitus complaint. The clinical assessment made blindly and over different tikme scale to the Benefit/problem questionnaire matched these positive results quite closely.

Keywords

TinnitusQusetionnaires
Type
Main Articles
Information
The Journal of Laryngology & Otology , Volume 109 , Issue 9 , September 1995 , pp. 826 - 829
Copyright
Copyright © JLO (1984) Limited 1995

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Halford, J. B. (1991) Tinnitus severity measured by subjective scale, audiometry and clinical judgment. Journal of Laryngology and Otology 105: 89–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
House, P. R. (1981) Personality of tinnitus patients. In CIBA Foundation 85: Tinnitus. Pitmann Press, London, pp 193–199.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jakes, S. C, Hallan, R. S., Chambers, C., Hinchcliffe, R. A. (1985) Factor analytical study of tinnitus complaint behaviour. Audiology 24: 196–206.Google ScholarPubMed
Kirsch, C. A., Blanchard, E. B., Parnes, S. (1989) Psychological characteristics of individuals high and low in their ability to cope with tinnitus. Journal of Psychomatic Medicine 51: 209–217.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stephens, S. T. G., Lewis, L.A., Sanchez, L. (1993) Tinnitus complaint behaviour and its measurement. Proceedings of the second International Meeting in Audiology for the Mediterranean Countries at Thessaloniki, pp 853–861.Google Scholar
Stephens, S. T. G., Meredith, R. (1991) Qualitative reports of hearing aid benefit. Clinical Rehabilitation 5: 225–229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sweetow, R. W. (1986) Cognitive aspects of tinnitus patient management. Hearing Aids in Aural Rehabilitation 7(6): 390–396.Google ScholarPubMed
Sweetow, R. W. (1989) Adjunctive approaches to tinnitus and patient management. Hearing Journalist 42: pp 38–43.Google Scholar