Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jn8rn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T11:56:33.187Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The accuracy of dry surgical field sublabial biopsy in the diagnosis of sicca syndrome

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 August 2021

L O’ Byrne*
Affiliation:
Department of Otorhinolaryngology/Head and Neck Surgery, St Vincent's University Hospital, Dublin University College Dublin School of Medicine, Health Sciences Centre, Dublin, Ireland
R Ramli
Affiliation:
Department of Otorhinolaryngology/Head and Neck Surgery, St Vincent's University Hospital, Dublin University College Dublin School of Medicine, Health Sciences Centre, Dublin, Ireland
S G Khoo
Affiliation:
Department of Otorhinolaryngology/Head and Neck Surgery, St Vincent's University Hospital, Dublin University College Dublin School of Medicine, Health Sciences Centre, Dublin, Ireland
*
Author for correspondence: Ms Lisa O’ Byrne, Department of Otorhinolaryngology/Head and Neck Surgery, St Vincent's University Hospital, Elm Park, Dublin 4, DO4 T6F4, Ireland E-mail: [email protected] Fax: +353 1 221 3996
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Background

Sublabial gland biopsy is the ‘gold standard’ in establishing the diagnosis of primary Sjögren's syndrome. Bleeding and nerve damage are complications. Our centre has adopted the use of the chalazion clamp to provide a dry surgical field to address these challenges. This study aimed to assess the accuracy of minor salivary gland harvest rate using this technique.

Method

A retrospective review of all minor salivary gland biopsies was carried out in a single tertiary referral centre over a five-year period.

Results

Forty-one biopsy patients were identified, with a mean age of 56.1 years. There was 100 per cent accuracy in harvest rate in our series. Twelve patients (29 per cent) were positive for primary Sjögren's syndrome. No patients had a complication immediately or at one month follow up.

Conclusion

Dry surgical field sublabial gland biopsy is a safe and highly effective technique in the diagnosis of primary Sjögren's syndrome. Initial results indicate it may provide a higher harvest rate with fewer complications than traditional non-ischaemic techniques.

Type
Main Articles
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press

Introduction

Sjögren's syndrome is a multi-organ connective tissue disorder characterised by xerostomia and xeropthalmia. These symptoms are collectively known as sicca syndrome.Reference Ramos-Casals, Brito-Zerón, Sisó-Almirall and Bosche1 Pathogenesis is poorly understood. However, lymphocytic infiltration propagating multi-system chronic inflammation, particularly of the exocrine glands, appears to be a defining feature. In addition to the glandular manifestations, a broad range of other systems may be implicated, collectively known as extra-glandular features. Examples include vasculitis, peripheral neuropathy, renal tubular acidosis, pulmonary involvement, lymphoproliferative disease and/or immunological abnormalities.Reference Chisholm and Mason2 Like most rheumatological diseases, there is a strong female preponderance. Although geographic variation exists, with European and Asian populations most affected, a 2014 meta-analysis found an overall incidence of 7 per 100 000 globally.Reference Qin, Wang, Yang, Yang, Ma and Huang3

Sjögren's syndrome can occur in a primary form, described as an isolated sicca syndrome, and in a secondary form, where concurrent rheumatological disease exists, most commonly rheumatoid arthritis or systemic lupus erythematosus.Reference Kollert and Fisher4 Diagnosis can be challenging, and encompasses the objective findings of ocular and/or oral dryness and evidence of an underlying autoimmune pathology. Many differential diagnoses exist for sicca syndrome and there is no single diagnostic to determine Sjögren's syndrome, hence classification systems and disease criteria are vital.

In 2016, the American College of Rheumatology and the European League Against Rheumatism jointly endorsed a new set of criteria developed by the Sjögren's International Collaborative Clinical Alliance investigators for the classification of primary Sjögren's syndrome.Reference Mariette and Criswell5,Reference Shiboski, Shiboski, Seror, Criswell, Labetoulle and Lietman6 These guidelines are based on a weighted scoring system, where a score of 4 or more is required to make the diagnosis. In addition, an individual can only be classified as having primary Sjögren's syndrome if they have either of the following two items (each with a score value of 3 points): relevant autoantibodies or a sublabial gland biopsy showing focal lymphocytic sialadenitis.

Despite being considered the foremost investigation for the establishment of primary Sjögren's syndrome, a sublabial gland biopsy is an invasive procedure and is often reserved for those cases where a diagnostic dilemma exists such that appropriate treatment cannot be instigated. A variety of surgical techniques have been described in the literature with varying harvest rates. Typically, four salivary gland lobules are required to definitively diagnose primary Sjögren's syndrome.Reference Daniels and Fox7 Challenges include identifying these glands when using a minimally invasive technique in a highly vascular mucosal surface in a conscious patient under local anaesthetic. Reported complications include bleeding, infection, wound dehiscence, scarring and lower lip numbness. Damage to surrounding nerves with resultant paraesthesia has been noted in up to 11 per cent of cases, often through inadequate recognition of the proximity of the mental nerve to the harvest site.Reference Varela Centelles, Sánchez-Sánchez, Costa-Bouzas, Seoane-Romero, Seoane and Takkouche8

In an effort to make this procedure as seamless, bloodless and safe as possible, our institution adopted the chalazion clamp technique to enhance the identification of pertinent structures in a timely manner. Our initial experience with this variation to the traditional technique was overwhelmingly positive, whereby glands were obtained in all cases and no complications were recorded (n = 23).Reference Wijaya, Ramli and Khoo9 The present study aimed to evaluate the accuracy of this procedure in terms of providing a minimum number of glands required to aid histopathological diagnosis.

Materials and methods

Review process

A retrospective analysis was undertaken in a single tertiary referral centre at an academic institution. All patients who had undergone sublabial gland biopsy between July 2014 and September 2019 were analysed. Inclusion criteria were all patients referred from medical departments requesting gland biopsies for the diagnosis of Sjögren's syndrome, and limited to those who had undergone sublabial gland biopsy with a chalazion clamp, and who had attended a post-operative review clinic. Excluded were patients who underwent biopsies of minor salivary glands harvested in conjunction with the excision of other lip lesions in tandem. Patients who failed to attend the post-operative review clinic, those with missing medical records on post-operative review or patients who were lost to follow up were excluded. Medical records, operative notes and histopathological results were reviewed and data collected.

Operative technique

A standard 9 cm chalazion clamp with a 30 × 20 mm ellipsoid fenestra was utilised on all patients (Figure 1a and b). Gentle traction is applied at the edge of the lower lip using dry gauze, to reflect the lower lip forward and downward for access to the inner lip surface, exposing the mucosal surface where the minor salivary glands are located. The clamp is placed over the reflected lower lip in such a way that the fenestrated leaf of the clamp is resting on the mucosal surface, while the solid leaf is resting against the skin surface (Figure 2a). The clamp is tightened until superficial vessels are engorged and sublabial glands distended against mucosa (Figure 2b). Care is taken not to over-tighten the clamp, to avoid causing discomfort to the patient.

Fig. 1. (a) Frontal and (b) side views of the chalazion clamp demonstrating the fenestrated and non-fenestrated leaf and adjustment screw.

Fig. 2. (a) Side and (b) frontal views of the clamp in situ, and (c) image demonstrating local anaesthetic infiltration with a dental syringe.

Local anaesthetic (1–1.5 ml) is infiltrated, to ensure adequate anaesthesia and to aid haemostasis (Figure 2c). A 2 cm horizontal incision is made until submucosal tissue is exposed (Figure 3a). Some of the submucosal glands may readily extrude from the incision site. These are excised and placed in a formaldehyde specimen jar (Figure 3b). A blunt dissection is carried out, to obtain at least four to five visualised glands in a dry surgical field (Figure 3c). Limited bipolar diathermy can be used to ensure adequate haemostasis, or to prophylactically ensure haemostasis, where severed blood vessels could be readily identified in the field. Prior to this stage, it is good practice to positively identify a branch of the mental nerve (Figure 3d).

Fig. 3. Images demonstrating: (a) the incision performed, (b) the glandular tissue identified, (c) the dissection of these glands using Adson's forceps and Iris scissors, and (d) the mental nerve carefully preserved.

Results

Forty-five cases were identified. The mean age of patients was 56.1 years, with 3 males and 42 females, and a male-to-female ratio of 1:14. After exclusion criteria were applied, 41 cases remained.

All operators outlined the specific number of glands harvested in the intra-operative record. Of the 41 procedures included, all histopathological reports identified sublingual gland tissue (100 per cent). Histopathological reports identified a specified number of glands, or histology was reported as ‘multiple glands harvested’. Thirty-two specimens (78 per cent) had a specified number of glands harvested, eight (19.5 per cent) were described as having multiple glands present and one (2.5 per cent) did not specify quantity (Figure 4). The number of glands harvested varied from four to nine glands. The median number harvested was 5.5 (interquartile range = 4.75–6).

Fig. 4. Summary of numbers of glands harvested, as identified by histopathological analysis.

Twenty-nine per cent of patients (n = 12) were identified as having primary Sjögren's syndrome on histological analysis. Fifty-six per cent (n = 23) were negative for Sjögren's syndrome and 15 per cent (n = 6) had inconclusive findings. Our data demonstrated a sensitivity of 92.31 per cent (95 per cent confidence interval (CI) = 63.97–99.81) and a specificity of 100 per cent (95 per cent CI = 84.56–100.00). The positive predictive value was 100 per cent and the negative predictive value was 95.65 per cent (95 per cent CI = 76.99–99.31). The disease prevalence was 37.14 per cent (95 per cent CI = 21.47–55.08) in this group of patients.

At follow up, no patient (0 per cent) had a complication when reviewed one month later in the out-patients department.

Discussion

Sublingual gland biopsy is an invaluable tool in diagnosing primary Sjögren's syndrome. Patients presenting with xeropthalmia and xerostomia have a wide differential diagnosis, including but not limited to age-related sicca syndrome, immunoglobulin G4 related disease, lymphoepithelial sialadenitis, granulomatous disease and haematological malignancy. Despite the working diagnosis of all patients in our series being primary Sjögren's syndrome, only 29 per cent of patients displayed histological characteristics of the disease. This is an important consideration in the investigation and subsequent management of these patients, and re-affirms the important role for sublabial gland biopsy in their diagnosis. In addition to its use in diagnosing primary Sjögren's syndrome, sublabial gland biopsy can also be helpful in the diagnosis of amyloidosis, sarcoidosis and neonatal haemochromatosis.Reference Varela-Centelles, Seoane-Romero, Sánchez-Sánchez, González-Mosquera, Diz-Dios and Seoane10

The accuracy of this procedure is imperative in order to provide adequate tissue such that mononuclear infiltration can be observed, characterised and differential pathological processes ruled out. Given that this procedure is invasive and not without its complications, one must have confidence in the surgical technique, of which several have been described. Fisher and colleagues’ data, collated from International Collaboration between Rheumatology Research Group colleagues, suggested a minimum of four glands to allow proper histological analysis.Reference Fisher, Jonsson, Daniels, Bombardieri, Brown and Morgan11 The most characteristic feature of primary Sjögren's syndrome on biopsy is focal lymphocytic sialadenitis, which describes the presence of dense aggregates (foci) of 50 or more mononuclear cells (mostly lymphocytes), in a periductal or perivascular localisation.Reference Fisher, Jonsson, Daniels, Bombardieri, Brown and Morgan11

The sensitivity and specificity values of sublabial gland biopsy are variable. A meta-analysis concluded a high diagnostic value for primary Sjögren's syndrome, with specificity of 88 per cent (standard deviation (SD) ± 11.7) and sensitivity of 78.8 per cent (SD ± 11.2), a positive predictive value of 87.6 per cent (SD ± 9.5) and a negative predictive value of 79.0 per cent (SD ± 16.9).Reference Guellec, Cornec, Jousse-Joulin, Marhadour, Marcorelles and Pers12 Our sensitivity and specificity values are amongst the highest reported, with sensitivity of 92 per cent and specificity of 100 per cent observed in the present study.

Despite its utility, there is a notable paucity of standardisation of the sublabial gland biopsy procedure. Earlier studies describe a ‘punch’ technique, but, because of inadequate specimen provision, this method has been largely replaced by a more technically complex but higher yield surgical method.Reference Bertram and Hjgrting-Hansen13 Of these more conventional procedures, several techniques have been described, with marked variations in incision length (0.1–3 cm), incision direction (vertical, circular or oblique) and instruments used.Reference Varela-Centelles, Seoane-Romero, Sánchez-Sánchez, González-Mosquera, Diz-Dios and Seoane10,Reference Colella, Cannavale, Vicidomini and Itro14 One study described a technique that could be used by non-surgical physicians in the out-patient setting.Reference Friedman, Miller and Huszar15

On review of the literature, harvest rates are not elucidated for each individual method, and subsequently no direct comparison has been performed between techniques. Where harvest rates are reported, significant heterogeneity exists. The largest published series of sublabial gland biopsy in Sjögren's syndrome, of 362 patients, reports a miss rate of 10 per cent.Reference Daniels16 More recently, a report from 502 patients with suspected Sjögren's syndrome or amyloidosis described a miss rate of less than 1 per cent.Reference Caporalli, Bonacci, Epis, Bobbio-Pallavincini, Morbini and Montecucco17 This is in contrast to our current study where no insufficient samples were reported.

  • Sublabial gland biopsy is important in diagnosing Sjögren's syndrome; four glands are ideally harvested to provide adequate tissue for histopathological review

  • Given the harvest site location, the difficulty identifying anatomical structures and the risk to the mental nerve, a dry surgical field is desirable

  • Chalazion clamp use can achieve an ischaemic field, facilitating swift and seamless removal of the glands, unobscured by troublesome haemorrhage

  • The accuracy of this technique was 100 per cent in our series of 41 patients, with all specimens providing adequate glandular tissue

  • No patient in our series suffered a complication, indicating the safety of this procedure

Chalazion clamps are most commonly found in the hands of our ophthalmic surgery colleagues when performing incision and drainage of a chalazion. However, their roles in other specialties have been described for nearly 50 years.Reference Garcia and Davis18 The fenestrated leaf lends itself perfectly to exposing the operating field, while the adjustment screw allows an adjustable tourniquet effect, providing variable degrees of ischaemia to allow intervention. This relative ischaemia is invaluable in the process of identifying the small white, semi-translucent sublabial glands from surrounding connective tissue, where even a minor amount of haemorrhage will obscure subtle macroscopic distinguishing features. In addition to identifying the glands themselves, blood vessels may be managed in a proactive manner; the mental nerve may be identified to minimise the risk of traction or thermal injury, lessening the incidence of resultant hypoaesthesia. In this series, no patient reported numbness of the lower lip, in comparison to the 6–11 per cent rates described in the literature.Reference Caporalli, Bonacci, Epis, Bobbio-Pallavincini, Morbini and Montecucco17

Conclusion

Subsequent to our earlier report in 2019 describing our initial experience with the chalazion clamp, we found that this method of providing a dry surgical field has once again proven to be reliable and safe. In our present study using this technique, there was a 100 per cent harvest rate, with no sample found to be insufficient. Building upon this series going forward in the future, we hope to draw further comparisons between this and other more traditional techniques.

Competing interests

None declared

Footnotes

Ms L O'Byrne takes responsibility for the integrity of the content of the paper

An earlier iteration of this study was presented orally at the Irish Otolaryngology/Head and Neck meeting, 10–11 October 2019, Lyrath Estate, Kilkenny, Ireland.

References

Ramos-Casals, M, Brito-Zerón, P, Sisó-Almirall, A, Bosche, X. Primary Sjogren syndrome. BMJ 2012;344:e382eCrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chisholm, DM, Mason, DK. Labial salivary gland biopsy in Sjögren's disease. J Clin Pathol 1968;21:656–60CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Qin, B, Wang, J, Yang, Z, Yang, M, Ma, N, Huang, F et al. Epidemiology of primary Sjögren's syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Rheum Dis 2015;74:1983–9CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kollert, F, Fisher, BA. Equal rights in autoimmunity: is Sjögren's syndrome ever ‘secondary’? Rheumatology (Oxford) 2020;59:1218–25CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mariette, X, Criswell, LA. Primary Sjögren's syndrome. N Engl J Med 2018;378:931–9CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Shiboski, CH, Shiboski, SC, Seror, R, Criswell, LA, Labetoulle, M, Lietman, TM et al. ; International Sjögren's Syndrome Criteria Working Group. 2016 American College of Rheumatology/European League Against Rheumatism classification criteria for primary Sjögren's syndrome: a consensus and data-driven methodology involving three international patient cohorts. Ann Rheum Dis 2017;76:916CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Daniels, TE, Fox, PC. Salivary and oral components of Sjögren's syndrome. Rheum Dis Clin North Am 1992;18:571–89CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Varela Centelles, P, Sánchez-Sánchez, M, Costa-Bouzas, J, Seoane-Romero, JM, Seoane, J, Takkouche, B. Neurological adverse events related to lip biopsy in patients suspicious for Sjögren's syndrome: a systematic review and prevalence meta-analysis. Rheumatology (Oxford) 2014;53:1208–14CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wijaya, C, Ramli, RR, Khoo, SG. Dry surgical field minor salivary gland harvest using a chalazion clamp for sicca syndrome. J Laryngol Otol 2019;133:419–23CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Varela-Centelles, P, Seoane-Romero, JM, Sánchez-Sánchez, M, González-Mosquera, A, Diz-Dios, P, Seoane, J. Minor salivary gland biopsy in Sjögren's syndrome: a review and introduction of a new tool to ease the procedure. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal 2014;19:e20–3CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fisher, BA, Jonsson, R, Daniels, T, Bombardieri, M, Brown, RM, Morgan, P et al. ; Sjögren's histopathology workshop group (appendix) from ESSENTIAL (EULAR Sjögren's syndrome study group). Standardisation of labial salivary gland histopathology in clinical trials in primary Sjögren's syndrome. Ann Rheum Dis 2017;76:1161–8CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Guellec, D, Cornec, D, Jousse-Joulin, S, Marhadour, T, Marcorelles, P, Pers, JO. Diagnostic value of labial minor salivary gland biopsy for Sjögren's syndrome: a systematic review. Autoimmun Rev 2013;12:416–20CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bertram, U, Hjgrting-Hansen, E. Punch-biopsy of minor salivary glands in the diagnosis of Sjogren's syndrome. Scand J Dent Res 1970;78:295300Google Scholar
Colella, G, Cannavale, R, Vicidomini, A, Itro, A. Salivary gland biopsy: a comprehensive review of techniques and related complications. Rheumatology (Oxford) 2010;49:2117–21CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Friedman, JA, Miller, EB, Huszar, M. A simple technique for minor salivary gland biopsy appropriate for use by rheumatologists in an outpatient setting. Clin Rheumatol 2002;21:349–50CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Daniels, TE. Labial salivary gland biopsy in Sjogren's syndrome. Assessment as a diagnostic criterion in 362 suspected cases. Arthritis Rheum 1984;27:147–56CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Caporalli, R, Bonacci, E, Epis, O, Bobbio-Pallavincini, F, Morbini, P, Montecucco, C. Safety and usefulness of minor salivary gland biopsy: retrospective analysis of 502 procedures performed at a single center. Arthritis Rheum 2008;59:714–20CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garcia, RL, Davis, CM. Chalazion clamp for dermatological surgery. Arch Dermatol 1970;102:693CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Figure 0

Fig. 1. (a) Frontal and (b) side views of the chalazion clamp demonstrating the fenestrated and non-fenestrated leaf and adjustment screw.

Figure 1

Fig. 2. (a) Side and (b) frontal views of the clamp in situ, and (c) image demonstrating local anaesthetic infiltration with a dental syringe.

Figure 2

Fig. 3. Images demonstrating: (a) the incision performed, (b) the glandular tissue identified, (c) the dissection of these glands using Adson's forceps and Iris scissors, and (d) the mental nerve carefully preserved.

Figure 3

Fig. 4. Summary of numbers of glands harvested, as identified by histopathological analysis.