Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-r5fsc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T05:10:37.920Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The use of cortical bone grafts in ossiculoplasty

II: Graft mass and hearing change at different frequencies

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 June 2007

R. P. Mills
R. P. Mills*
Affiliation:
Department of Otolaryngology, Ninewells Hospital and Medical School, Dundee.
*
Mr R. P. Mills, Department of Otolaryngology, Ninewells Hospital, Dundee DD1 9SY.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstarct

The masses of preserved ossicles and cortical bone grafts have been studied in vitro using a Stanton Unimatic CL41 balance. The cortical bone grafts prepared for use in malleus-stapes assemblies had a mean mass 28 per cent greater than that for an incus, while those prepared for use in a malleus-footplate or drum-footplate assembly had a mean mass 58 per cent greater. Analysis of the hearing results for the first 20 ossiculoplasty operations performed by the author using cortical bone grafts revealed no significant differences in outcome attributable to increased mass. However, large grafts did become fixed to surrounding structures in some cases.

Keywords

Ossicular replacement prosthesiscortical bone massHearing tests
Type
Main Articles
Information
The Journal of Laryngology & Otology , Volume 107 , Issue 8 , August 1993 , pp. 690 - 694
Copyright
Copyright © JLO (1984) Limited 1993

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Anthony, W. P., Harrison, C. W. (1972) Tympanic membrane perforation: effect on audiogram. Archives of Otolaryngology 95: 506–510CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Clarke, G. M., Dunlop, C. W. (1968) Middle ear sound transmission. Archives of Otolaryngology 88: 35–42Google Scholar
Elbrond, O., Elpern, S. (1965) Reconstruction of ossicular chain in incus defects: an experimental study. Archives of Otolaryngology 82: 603–608Google Scholar
Green, D. S., Lee, K. J. (1973) Hearing and speech. In The Otolaryngology Boards. (Lee, K. J., ed.), The Medical Books Publishing Co. Inc., p.39–56Google Scholar
Hoffman, A., Zollner, F. (1969) Ossicular autografts and homografts: round table discussion. Archives of Otolaryngology 89: 229–234Google Scholar
Kirkae, I., Sato, Y., Kawamura, S., Sato, M., Funasaka, S., Okabe, K. (1964) An experimental study of pathological middle ear mechanisms. Annals of Otology, Rhinology and Laryngology 73: 124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pickles, J. O. (1987) Physiology of the ear. In Scott-Brown's Otolaryngology. 5th edition. (Kerr, A. G., Wright, D. W., eds.), p. 47–80Google Scholar
Plester, D., Steinbach, E. (1977) Histologic fate of tympanic membrane and ossicle homografts. Otology Climes of North America 10: 487–499Google Scholar
Pulec, J. L., Sheehy, J. (1973) Symposium on tympanoplasty: ossicular reconstruction. Laryngoscope 83: 448–465Google Scholar
Schuring, A. G., Lippy, W. H. (1983) Solving ossicular problems in tympanoplasty. Laryngoscope 93: 1151–1154Google Scholar