Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-vdxz6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T13:08:34.811Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Tissue banking in ENT: challenges and methods

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 June 2013

E Warner ,
M Birchall  and
M W Lowdell
E Warner
Affiliation:
University College London Medical School, London, UK
M Birchall
Affiliation:
Department of Laryngology, Royal National Throat, Nose and Ear Hospital, London, UK
M W Lowdell*
Affiliation:
Cellular Therapy and Biobanking, Royal Free Hospital NHS Trust, London, UK
*
Address for correspondence: Dr Mark W Lowdell, UCL/RFH BioBank, Royal Free London NHS Foundation Trust, London NW3 2QG, UK E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Background:

Biobanking is the process of storing high quality human biospecimens alongside linked clinical data, for research purposes. The aim is to identify novel biomarkers with prognostic or diagnostic significance. However, the challenges implicit in the collection and storage of human tissue for research have curtailed the impact of this technique to date.

Aim:

This paper aims to summarise the challenges faced by biobanking within the ENT specialty in the UK, and to present protocols used for the routine collection, freezing and storage of tissue specimens at the Royal National Throat, Nose and Ear Hospital. These protocols could be used to guide other ENT departments (in the UK and worldwide) wishing to initiate the routine collection and storage of tissue samples. Their publication could also help to establish basic standards and ensure consistency in ENT tissue storage.

Methods:

Interviews conducted with industry experts, and a literature review of ‘best practice’ in biobanking.

Conclusion:

The ENT specialty must stay abreast of progress in human tissue research in order to ensure the best possible management of its patients. Our protocol for the routine banking of ENT tissue at the Royal National Throat, Nose and Ear Hospital could be used as a template for other ENT departments (in the UK and worldwide) to encourage widespread implementation of high quality tissue banking.

Keywords

Tissue BanksOtolaryngologyBiomarkers
Type
Main Articles
Information
The Journal of Laryngology & Otology , Volume 127 , Issue 7 , July 2013 , pp. 630 - 637
Copyright
Copyright © JLO (1984) Limited 2013 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

Presented at the Laryngology 2011 International Conference, 20–22 June 2011, London, UK

References

1Oosterhuis, JW, Coebergh, JW, van Veen, EB. Tumour banks: well-guarded treasures in the interest of patients. Nat Rev Cancer 2003;3:73–7CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
2Peakman, TC, Elliott, P. The UK Biobank sample handling and storage validation studies. Int J Epidemiol 2008;37(suppl 1):i2–6CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
3Riddick, AC, Barker, C, Sheriffs, I, Bass, R, Ellis, V, Sethia, KK et al. Banking of fresh-frozen prostate tissue: methods, validation and use. Br J Urol 2003;91:315–23CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
4Pitchers, M, Stokes, A, Lonsdale, R, Premachandra, DJ, Edwards, DR. Research tissue banking in otolaryngology: organization, methods and uses, with reference to practical, ethical and legal issues. J Laryngol Otol 2006;120:433–8CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
5Reis, ST, Feitosa, EB, Pontes-Junior, J, Marin, CC, Abe, DK, Crippa, A et al. Tumor banks: the cornerstone of basic research in urology. Int Braz J Urol 2010;36:348–54CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
6Enosawa, S, Suzuki, S, Amemiya, H, Tsuchihashi, N, Kawashiro, N, Utsugi, S et al. Establishment of public human tissue resource bank for research purposes with surgically removed tonsil tissue: potential scientific value and ethical problem. Transplant Proc 2002;34:2686–7CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
7Barbareschi, M, Cotrupi, S, Guarrera, GM. Biobanks: instrumentation, personnel and cost analysis. Pathologica 2008;100:139–48Google ScholarPubMed
8Mager, SR, Oomen, MHA, Morente, MM, Ratcliffe, C, Knox, K, Kerr, DJ et al. Standard operating procedure for the collection of fresh frozen tissue samples. Eur J Cancer 2007;43:828–34CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
9Hansson, MG, Dillner, J, Bartram, CR, Carlson, JA, Helgesson, G. Should donors be allowed to give broad consent to future Biobank research? Lancet Oncol 2006;7:266–9CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
10Naber, SP. Continuing role of a frozen-tissue bank in molecular pathology. Diagn Mol Pathol 1996;5:253–9CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
11Dhir, R. Prostate cancer biobanking. Curr Opin Urol 2008;18:309–14CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
12Chu, TY, Hwang, KS, Yu, MH, Lee, HS, Lai, HC, Liu, JY. A research-based tumor tissue bank of gynecologic oncology: characteristics of nucleic acids extracted from normal and tumor tissues from different sites. Int J Gynecol Cancer 2002;12:171–6CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
13Gaskell, G, Gottweis, H. Biobanks need publicity. Nature 2011;471:159–60CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
14Melas, PA, Sjoholm, LK, Forsner, T, Edhborg, M, Juth, N, Forsell, Y et al. Examining the public refusal to consent to DNA biobanking: empirical data from a Swedish population-based study. J Med Ethics 2010;36:93–8CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed