Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-ndw9j Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-20T05:39:37.670Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The techniques of nonmuscular closure of hypopharyngeal defect following total laryngectomy: the assessment of complication and pharyngoesophageal segment

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 June 2007

Ching-Ping Wang
Affiliation:
Department of Otolaryngology, Veterans General Hospital, National Yang Ming University, Taipei, Taiwan
Tzu-Chan Tseng
Affiliation:
Department of Otolaryngology, Veterans General Hospital, National Yang Ming University, Taipei, Taiwan
Rheun-Chuan Lee
Affiliation:
Department of Radiology, Veterans General Hospital, National Yang Ming University, Taipei, Taiwan
Shyue-Yih Chang*
Affiliation:
Department of Otolaryngology, Veterans General Hospital, National Yang Ming University, Taipei, Taiwan
*
Address for correspondence: Shyue-Yih Chang, M.D., Department of Otolaryngology, Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan. Fax: 886-2-8757338

Abstract

The usual method of reconstructing a hypopharyngeal defect during total laryngectomy includes pharyngeal muscle layer closure, which may result in high pharyngoesophageal pressure. We hypothesize that nonclosure of the pharyngeal muscle can reduce the pressure of the pharyngoesophageal segment which can reduce the chances of the formation of pharyngocutaneous fistulae. A technique of nonmuscular closure of a hypopharyngeal defect is presented. The differences in the rate of fistula formation and swallowing function between patients with usual and nonmuscular closure were also studied. Sixty consecutive laryngectomees were enrolled in this study. Thirty patients received usual closure after total laryngectomy, whereas the other 30 patients underwent non closure of their pharyngeal muscles. One patient (3.3 per cent) in the nonmuscular closure group and three patients (10 per cent) in the usual closure group developed a pharyngocutaneous fistula. The pharyngoesophageal pressures of the nonmuscular closure group were significantly lower than those of the usual closure group. We conclude that the technique of nonclosure of the pharyngeal constrictor muscle after total laryngectomy is relatively more simple and is not associated with a higher rate of fistula formation. Furthermore, nonclosure of the pharyngeal constrictor muscle is preferable to muscular closure because it reduces the spasm of the pharyngoesophageal segment which limits voice rehabilitation.

Type
Main Articles
Copyright
Copyright © JLO (1984) Limited 1997

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Baugh, R. F., Lewin, J. S., Baker, S. R. (1987) Pre-operative assessment of tracheoesophageal speech. Laryngoscope 97: 461466.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baugh, R. F., Lewin, J. S., Baker, S. R. (1990) Vocal rehabilitation of tracheoesophageal speech failures. Head and Neck 12: 6973.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Clevens, R. A., Esclamado, R. M., Hartshorn, D. O., Lewin, J. S. (1993) Voice rehabilitation after total laryngectomy and tracheoesophageal puncture using nonmuscle closure. Annals of Otology, Rhinology and Laryngology 102: 792796.Google Scholar
Henley, J., Souliere, C. Jr. (1986) Tracheoesophageal speech failure in the laryngectomee: the role of constrictor myotomy. Laryngoscope 96: 10161020.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Horowitz, J. B., Sasaki, C. T. (1993) Effect of cricopharyngeus myotomy on postlaryngectomy pharyngeal contraction pressures. Laryngoscope 103: 138140.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lavelle, R. J., Maw, A. R. (1972) The aetiology of postlaryngectomy pharyngocutaneous fistulae. Journal of Laryngology and Otology 86: 785793.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mahieu, H. F., Annyas, A. A., Schutte, H. K., Jagt, E. J. V. D. (1987) Pharyngoesophageal myotomy for vocal rehabilitation of laryngectomees. Laryngoscope 97: 451457.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McConnel, F. M. S. (1988) Analysis of pressure generation and bolus transit during pharyngeal swallowing. Laryngoscope 98: 7178.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McConnel, F. M. S., Logemann, J. A. (1990) Diagnosis and treatment of swallowing disorders. In Otolaryngology – Head and Neck Surgery Update II. (Cummings, C. W., ed.) CV Mosby Co., St. Louis, pp 1038.Google Scholar
McConnel, F. M. S., Mendelsohn, M. S., Logemann, J. A. (1986) Examination of swallowing after total laryngectomy using manofluorography. Head and Neck Surgery 9: 312.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Olson, N. R., Callaway, E. (1990) Nonclosure of pharyngeal muscle after laryngectomy. Annals of Otology, Rhinology and Laryngology 99: 507508.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schobinger, R. (1958) Spasm of the cricopharyngeal muscle as cause of dysphagia after total laryngectomy. Archives of Otolaryngology 67: 271274.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Scott, P. M. J., Bleach, N. R., Perry, A. R., Cheesman, A. D. (1993) Complications of pharyngeal myotomy for alaryngeal voice rehabilitation. Journal of Laryngology and Otology 107: 430433.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Singer, M. I., Blom, E. D. (1981) Selective myotomy for voice restoration after total laryngectomy. Archives of Otolaryngology 107: 670673.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Singer, M. I., Blom, E. D., Hamaker, R. C. (1981) Further experience with voice restoration after total laryngectomy. Annals of Otology, Rhinology and Laryngology 90: 498502.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Singer, M. I., Blom, E. D., Hamaker, R. C. (1986) Pharyngeal plexus neurectomy for alaryngeal speech rehabilitation. Laryngoscope 96: 5054.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed