Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dsjbd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T11:20:39.900Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Symmorphosis in relation to the relative dimensions of the glottic and tracheal area in the mammalian larynx

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 June 2007

D. F. N. Harrison  and
Susan Denny
D. F. N. Harrison*
Affiliation:
London
Susan Denny
Affiliation:
London
*
Prof. D. F. N. Harrison, M.D., M.S., Ph.D., F.R.C.S., The Institute of Laryngology and Otology, 330 Gray's Inn Road, London WC1X 8EE
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

A large number of non-human mammalian larynges have been studied in an attempt to relate body mass to maximum glottic and tracheal area in order to confirm symmorphism.

Type
Main Articles
Information
The Journal of Laryngology & Otology , Volume 103 , Issue 11 , November 1989 , pp. 1053 - 1056
Copyright
Copyright © JLO (1984) Limited 1989

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Altman, S. A. (1987) The impact of locomotor energetics on mammalian foraging. Journal of Zoology, London, 211: 215–225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Calder, W. A. (1984) Size, function and life history. Harvard University Press: Massachusetts.Google Scholar
Garland, T. (1983) Relation between maximum running speed and body mass in terrestrial mammals. Journal of Zoology, London, 199: 157–170.Google Scholar
Harrison, D. F. N. and Denny, S. (1985) Possible influence of laryngeal and tracheal size on the running speed of mammals. Acta Otolaryngologica (Stockholm), 99: 229–235.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hill, A. V. (1950) The dimensions of animals and their muscular dynamics. Proceedings of the Royal Institute, Great Britain, 34: 450–471.Google Scholar
McMahon, T. A. (1975) Allometry and Biomechanics: limb bones in adult ungulates. American Nature, 109: 547–563.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Seeherman, H. J., Taylor, C. R., Malory, G. M. O., Armstrong, R. B. (1981) Design of the mammalian respiratory system. Respiration Physiology, 44: 11–23.Google Scholar
Schmidt-Nielson, K. (1984) Scaling. Why is animal size so important? Cambridge University Press: London.CrossRefGoogle Scholar