Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-vdxz6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T12:19:50.107Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Simultaneous bilateral transcutaneous bone conduction device implantation: sound localisation and speech perception in children with bilateral conductive hearing loss

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 October 2021

P Chen ,
L Yang ,
J Yang ,
D Wang ,
Y Li ,
C Zhao ,
Y Liu ,
M Gao ,
J Zhu  and
S Li
...Show all authors
P Chen
Affiliation:
Department of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Beijing Tongren Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China Ministry of Education, Key Laboratory of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Beijing, China
L Yang
Affiliation:
Department of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Beijing Tongren Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China Ministry of Education, Key Laboratory of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Beijing, China
J Yang
Affiliation:
Department of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Beijing Tongren Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China Ministry of Education, Key Laboratory of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Beijing, China
D Wang
Affiliation:
Department of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Beijing Tongren Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China Ministry of Education, Key Laboratory of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Beijing, China
Y Li
Affiliation:
Department of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Beijing Tongren Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China Ministry of Education, Key Laboratory of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Beijing, China
C Zhao
Affiliation:
Department of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
Y Liu
Affiliation:
Department of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Beijing Tongren Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China Ministry of Education, Key Laboratory of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Beijing, China
M Gao
Affiliation:
Department of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Beijing Tongren Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China Ministry of Education, Key Laboratory of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Beijing, China
J Zhu
Affiliation:
Department of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Beijing Tongren Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China Ministry of Education, Key Laboratory of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Beijing, China
S Li
Affiliation:
Department of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Beijing Tongren Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China Ministry of Education, Key Laboratory of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Beijing, China
S Zhao*
Affiliation:
Department of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Beijing Tongren Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China Ministry of Education, Key Laboratory of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Beijing, China
*
Author for correspondence: Prof S Zhao, Department of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Beijing Tongren Hospital, Capital Medical University, No.1 Dongjiaomin Lane, Dongcheng District, Beijing 100730, China E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Objective

This study investigated the audiometric and sound localisation results in patients with conductive hearing loss after bilateral Bonebridge implantation.

Method

Eight patients with congenital microtia and atresia supplied with bilateral Bonebridge devices were enrolled in this study. Hearing tests and sound localisation were tested under unaided, unilateral and bilateral aided conditions.

Results

Mean functional gain was higher with a bilateral fitting than with a unilateral fitting, especially at 1.0–4.0 kHz (p < 0.05, both). The improvement in speech reception threshold in noise with a bilateral fitting was a 2.3 dB higher signal-to-noise ratio compared with unilateral fitting (p < 0.05). Bilateral fitting had better sound localisation than unilateral fitting (p <0.001). Four participants who attended follow up showed improved sound localisation ability after one year.

Conclusion

Patients demonstrated better hearing threshold, speech reception thresholds in noise and directional hearing with bilateral Bonebridge devices than with a unilateral Bonebridge device. Sound localisation ability with bilateral Bonebridge devices can be improved through long-term training.

Keywords

Congenital Microtia And AtresiaBilateral Conductive Hearing LossSound LocalizationBone Conduction Hearing Device
Type
Main Article
Information
The Journal of Laryngology & Otology , Volume 136 , Issue 10 , October 2022 , pp. 939 - 946
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of J.L.O. (1984) LIMITED

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

Prof S Zhao takes responsibility for the integrity of the content of the paper

References

Jovic, TH, Gibson, JAG, Griffiths, R, Dobbs, TD, Akbari, A, Wilson-Jones, N et al. Microtia: a data linkage study of epidemiology and implications for service delivery. Front Pediatr 2021;9:630036CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Deng, K, Dai, L, Yi, L, Deng, CF, Li, XH. Epidemiologic characteristics and time trend in the prevalence of anotia and microtia in China. Birth Defects Res A Clin Mol Teratol 2016;106:88–94CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Teufert, KB, Cruz, ADL. Advances in congenital aural atresia surgery: effects on outcome. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2004;131:263–70CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kelley, PE, Scholes, MA. Microtia and congenital aural atresia. Otolaryngol Clin North Am 2007;40:61–80CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jensen, DR, Grames, LM, Lieu, JEC. Effects of aural atresia on speech development and learning: Retrospective analysis from a multidisciplinary craniofacial clinic. JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2013;139:797–802CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Johns, AL, Im, DD, Lewin, SL. Early familial experiences with microtia: psychosocial implications for pediatric providers. Clin Pediatr (Phila) 2018;57:775–82CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Shonka, DC Jr, Livingston, WJ 3rd, Kesser, BW. The Jahrsdoerfer grading scale in surgery to repair congenital aural atresia. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2008;134:873–7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Siegert, R, Magritz, R. Otoplasty and auricular reconstruction. Facial Plast Surg 2019;35:377–86Google ScholarPubMed
Yang, J, Chen, P, Zhao, C, Liu, Y, Gao, M, Huang, Z et al. Audiological and subjective outcomes of 100 implanted transcutaneous bone conduction devices and preoperative bone conduction hearing aids in patients with bilateral microtia-atresia. Acta Otolaryngologica 2020;140:667–73CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schmerber, S, Deguine, O, Marx, M, Van de Heyning, P, Sterkers, O, Mosnier, I et al. Safety and effectiveness of the Bonebridge transcutaneous active direct-drive bone-conduction hearing implant at 1-year device use. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2017;274:1835–51CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stelling-Kończak, A, Hagenzieker, M, Commandeur, JJF, Agterberg, MJH, Wee, BV. Auditory localisation of conventional and electric cars: Laboratory results and implications for cycling safety. Transport Res Part F: Traffic Psychol Behav 2016;41:227–42CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Avan, P, Giraudet, F, Buki, B. Importance of binaural hearing. Audiol Neurootol 2015;20:3–6CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Noble, W, Byrne, D, Lepage, B. Effects on sound localization of configuration and type of hearing impairment. J Acoust Soc Am 1994;95:992–1005CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nopp, P, Schleich, P, D'Haese, P. Sound localization in bilateral users of MED-EL COMBI 40/40þ cochlear implants. Ear Hear 2004;25:205–14CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Koci, V, Seebacher, J, Weichbold, V, Zorowka, P, Wolf-Magele, A, Sprinzl, G et al. Improvement of sound source localization abilities in patients bilaterally supplied with active middle ear implants. Acta Otolaryngol 2016;136:692–8CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
den Besten, CA, Vogt, K, Bosman, AJ, Snik, AFM, Hol, MKS, Agterberg, MJH. The merits of bilateral application of bone-conduction devices in children with bilateral conductive hearing loss. Ear Hear 2020;41:1327–32CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Priwin, C, Stenfelt, S, Granstrom, G, Tjellstrom, A, Hakansson, B. Bilateral bone-anchored hearing aids (BAHAs): an audiometric evaluation. Laryngoscope 2004;114:77–84CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dun, C, Agterberg, M, Cremers, C et al. Bilateral bone conduction devices: improved hearing ability in children with bilateral conductive hearing loss. Ear Hear 2013;34:806–8CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bosman, AJ, Snik, A, Van er Pouw, CT, Mylanus, EA, Cremers, CW. Audiometric evaluation of bilaterally fitted bone-anchored hearing aids. Audiology 2001;40:158–67CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Katz, J, Lezynski, J. Clinical masking. In: Katz, J, ed. Handbook of Clinical Audiology, 5th edn. Baltimore: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 2002;124–41Google Scholar
Stenfelt, S, Goode, RL. Bone-conducted sound: physiological and clinical aspects. Otol Neurotol 2005;26:1245–61CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zhao, C, Yang, J, Liu, Y, Gao, M, Chen, P, Zheng, J et al. Horizontal sound localisation and speech perception in Bonebridge-implanted single-sided deafness patients. J Laryngol Otol 2020;134:814–21CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vogt, K, Frenzel, H, Ausili, SA, Hollfelder, D, Wollenberg, B, Snik, AFM et al. Improved directional hearing of children with congenital unilateral conductive hearing loss implanted with an active bone-conduction implant or an active middle ear implant. Hear Res 2018;370:238–47CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Agterberg, MJH, Snik, AFM, Van de Goor, RMG, Hol, MKS, Van Opstal, AJ. Sound-localization performance of patients with single-sided deafness is not improved when listening with a bone-conduction device. Hear Res 2019;372:62–8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huber, AM, Sim, JH, Xie, YZ, Chatzimichalis, M, Ullrich, O, Roeoesli, C. The Bonebridge: preclinical evaluation of a new transcutaneously-activated bone anchored hearing device. Hear Res 2013;301:93–9CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Janssen, RM, Hong, P, Chadha, NK. Bilateral bone-anchored hearing aids for bilateral permanent conductive hearing loss: a systematic review. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2012;147:412–22CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Persson, P, Harder, H, Arlinger, S, Magnuson, B. Speech recognition in background noise: monaural versus binaural listening conditions in normal-hearing patients. Otol Neurotol 2001;22:625–30CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Moore, , Brian, C J. Perceptual consequences of cochlear hearing loss and their implications for the design of hearing aid. Ear Hear 1996;17:133–61CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dobreva Marina, S, O'Neill William, E, Paige Gary, D. Influence of aging on human sound localization. J Neurophysiol 2011;105:2471–86CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaga, K, Setou, M, Nakamura, M. Bone-conducted sound lateralization of interaural time difference and interaural intensity difference in children and a young adult with bilateral microtia and atresia of the ears. Acta Otolaryngol 2001;121:274–7Google Scholar
Yost, WA. Sound source localization identification accuracy: level and duration dependencies. J Acoust Soc Am 2016;140:EL14CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fan, X, Ping, L, Yang, T, Niu, X, Chen, Y, Xia, X et al. Comparative effects of unilateral and bilateral bone conduction hearing devices on functional hearing and sound localization abilities in patients with bilateral microtia-atresia. Acta Otolaryngol 2020;140:575–82CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Yathiraj, A, Vanaja, CS. Age related changes in auditory processes in children aged 6 to 10 years. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 2015;79:1224–34CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Caspers, CJI, Janssen, AM, Agterberg, MJH, Cremers, C, Hol, MKS, Bosman, AJ. Sound localization with bilateral bone conduction devices. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2021;2:1–14Google Scholar
Zeitooni, M, Maki-Torkko, E, Stenfelt, S. Binaural hearing ability with bilateral bone conduction stimulation in subjects with normal hearing: implications for bone conduction hearing aids. Ear Hear 2016;37:690–702CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Farrell, NF, Banakis Hartl, RM, Benichoux, V, Brown, AD, Cass, SP, Tollin, DJ. Intracochlear measurements of interaural time and level differences conveyed by bilateral bone conduction systems. Otol Neurotol 2017;38:1476–83CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed