Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t8hqh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-20T07:23:59.914Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Septoplasty as a day-case procedure – a two centre study

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 June 2007

R. Benson-Mitchell ,
G. Kenyon  and
D. Gatland
R. Benson-Mitchell*
Affiliation:
Department of Otolaryngology, The Royal London Hospital, Whitechapel, London E1 1BB. Department of Otolaryngology, Southend General Hospital, Prittlewell Chase, Westcliffe on Sea, Essex SS0 0RY, UK.
G. Kenyon
Affiliation:
Department of Otolaryngology, The Royal London Hospital, Whitechapel, London E1 1BB.
D. Gatland
Affiliation:
Department of Otolaryngology, Southend General Hospital, Prittlewell Chase, Westcliffe on Sea, Essex SS0 0RY, UK.
*
Address for correspondence: R. Benson-Mitchell, F.R.C.S., Otolaryngology Consultants of Memphis, PC 777 Washington Avenue, P240 Memphis, Tennessee 38105, USA.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Day-stay surgery is an integral part of Otolaryngology. Many procedures which have traditionally been thought to require overnight stay can be carried out on a day care basis. We report our experience of treating 163 patients admitted for septal surgery as a day-case procedure. The paper summarizes the experience of two centres. One of these is a London Teaching Hospital, where surgery was performed through a dedicated day-case unit, and the other is a District General Hospital where patients were admitted to a day-case unit but had their surgery on a routine in-patient list.

As the result of this study we conclude that day-stay septoplasty is associated with a low complication rate and is a safe and acceptable procedure provided that strict selection criteria are followed. The cost implications are discussed.

Keywords

Day care, surgeryNasal septum, surgery
Type
Main Articles
Information
The Journal of Laryngology & Otology , Volume 110 , Issue 2 , February 1996 , pp. 129 - 131
Copyright
Copyright © JLO (1984) Limited 1996

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Audit Commission (1990) A Short Cut to Better Services. Day Surgery in England and Wales. HMSO, London.Google Scholar
Audit Commission (1991) Measuring Quality: the Patients View of Day Surgery. HMSO, London.Google Scholar
Buckley, J. G., Mitchell, D. B., Hickey, S. A., Fitzgerald, , O'Connor, A. F. (1991) Submucous resection of the nasal septum as an outpatient procedure. Journal of Laryngology and Otology 105: 544–546.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fenton, J. E., O'Dwyer, T. P. (1994) Adult day case tonsillectomy: a safe and viable option. Clinical Otolaryngology 19: 470–472.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kaddour, H. S. (1992) Myringoplasty under local anaesthesia: day case surgery. Clinical Otolaryngology 17: 567–568.Google Scholar
Kendrick, D., Gibbins, K. (1993) An audit of the complications of paediatric tonsillectomy, adenoidectomy and adenotonsillectomy. Clinical Otolaryngology 18: 115–117.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Leighton, S. E. J., Rowe-Jones, J. M., Knight, J. R., MooreGillon, V. L. (1993) Day case adenoidectomy. Clinical Otolaryngology 18: 215–219.Google Scholar
Maniglia, A. J., Kushner, H., Cozzi, L. (1989) Adenotonsillectomy – a safe outpatient procedure. Archives of Otolaryngology – Head and Neck Surgery 115: 92–94.Google Scholar