Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jkksz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T03:59:21.889Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Presbylarynx: is diabetes mellitus a risk factor for vocal atrophy? A prospective case–control study

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 November 2021

M Santos*
Affiliation:
Centro Hospitalar Universitário do Porto, Institute of Biomedical Sciences Abel Salazar (‘ICBAS’), Universidade do Porto, Porto, Portugal
A Machado
Affiliation:
Centro Hospitalar Universitário do Porto, Institute of Biomedical Sciences Abel Salazar (‘ICBAS’), Universidade do Porto, Porto, Portugal
S Vaz Freitas
Affiliation:
Centro Hospitalar Universitário do Porto, Institute of Biomedical Sciences Abel Salazar (‘ICBAS’), Universidade do Porto, Porto, Portugal Faculty of Health Sciences, Universidade Fernando Pessoa, Porto, Portugal Laboratory of Artificial Intelligence and Decision Support (‘LIAAD’), Institute for Systems and Computer Engineering, Technology and Science (‘INESC TEC’), Porto, Portugal
C Almeida e Sousa
Affiliation:
Centro Hospitalar Universitário do Porto, Institute of Biomedical Sciences Abel Salazar (‘ICBAS’), Universidade do Porto, Porto, Portugal
Á Moreira da Silva
Affiliation:
Centro Hospitalar Universitário do Porto, Institute of Biomedical Sciences Abel Salazar (‘ICBAS’), Universidade do Porto, Porto, Portugal
*
Author for correspondence: Dr Mariline Santos, Largo Abel Salazar, Centro Hospitalar Universitário do Porto, Portugal E-mail: [email protected]

Abstract

Objective

To evaluate the prevalence of diabetes mellitus type 2 in subjects with presbylarynx.

Method

A case–control, prospective study was carried out on consecutive subjects who presented to the otorhinolaryngology department.

Results

The study comprised 174 subjects (60 males and 114 females) with a mean age of 73.99 years (65–95 years). Presbylarynx was identified in 71 patients (41 per cent). Among patients with diabetes mellitus type 2, 20 patients (77 per cent) exhibited endoscopic signs of presbylarynx. A statistically significant difference was found between presbylarynx versus no presbylarynx concerning diabetes mellitus type 2 (p < 0.001). Subjects with diabetes mellitus type 2 were approximately eight times more likely to have presbylarynx compared to subjects without diabetes mellitus type 2.

Conclusion

In this study, 77 per cent of patients with diabetes mellitus type 2 had endoscopic signs of presbylarynx. A multivariable analysis, which took into account co-morbidities of the elderly, identified diabetes mellitus type 2 as a possible risk factor for presbylarynx. Many physiopathological mechanisms might explain this result, as diabetes mellitus type 2 is known to affect muscular, neurological and vascular systems.

Type
Main Article
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of J.L.O. (1984) LIMITED

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

Dr M Santos takes responsibility for the integrity of the content of the paper

References

Vaca, M, Cobeta, I, Mora, E, Reyes, P. Clinical assessment of glottal insufficiency in age-related dysphonia. J Voice 2017;128:15Google Scholar
Yamauchi, A, Imagawa, H, Sakakaibara, K, Yokonishi, H, Ueha, R, Nito, T et al. Vocal fold atrophy in a Japanese tertiary medical institute: status quo of the most aged country. J Voice 2014;28:231–6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sparano, A, Ruiz, C, Weinstein, GS. Voice rehabilitation after partial laryngeal surgery. Otolaryngol Clin North Am 2004;37:637–53CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mirza, N, Ruiz, C, Baum, ED, Staab, JP. The prevalence of major psychiatric pathologies in patients with voice disorders. Ear Nose Throat J 2003;82:808–14CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Takano, S, Kimura, M, Nito, T, Imagawa, H, Sakakibara, K, Tayama, N. Clinical analysis of presbylarynx—vocal fold atrophy in the elderly individuals. Auris Nasus Larynx 2010;37:461–7CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Woo, P, Casper, J, Colton, R, Brewer, D. Dysphonia in the aging: physiology versus disease. Laryngoscope 1992;102:139–44CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lundy, DS, Silva, C, Casiano, RR, Lu, FL, Xue, JW. Cause of hoarseness in elderly patients. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1998;118:481–5Google ScholarPubMed
Roy, N, Stemple, J, Merril, RM, Thomas, L. Epidemiology of voice disorders in the elderly: preliminary findings. Laryngoscope 2007;117:628–33CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kendall, K. Presbyphonia: a review. Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2007;15:137–40CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Machado, FC, Cielo, C, Lessa, M, Barbosa, LH. Vocal characteristics of elderly women engaged in aerobics in private institutions of Salvador, Bahia. J Voice 2016;30:919Google Scholar
Mallick, AS, Garas, G, McGlasham, J. Presbylaryngis: a state-of-the-art review. Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2019;27:168–77CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Martins, RH, Benito Pessin, AB, Nassib, DJ, Branco, A, Rodrigues, SA, Matheus, SM. Aging voice and the laryngeal muscle atrophy. Laryngoscope 2015;125:2518–21CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pessin, AB, Tavares, EL, Gramuglia, AC, Carvalho, LR, Martins, RHG. Voice and ageing: clinical, endoscopic and acoustic investigation. Clin Otolaryngol 2017;42:330–5CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pontes, P, Brasolotto, A, Behlau, M. Glottic characteristics and voice complaint in the elderly. J Voice 2005;19:8494CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pontes, P, Yamasaki, R, Behlau, M. Morphological and functional aspects of the senile larynx. Folia Phoniatr Logop 2006;58:151–8CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gregory, ND, Chandran, S, Lurie, D, Sataloff, RT. Voice disorders in the elderly. J Voice 2012;26:254–8CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Santos, M, Freitas, SV, Dias, D, Costa, J, Coutinho, M, Almeida e Sousa, C et al. Presbylarynx: does body muscle mass correlate with vocal atrophy? A prospective case control study. Laryngoscope 2021;131:226–30CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hamdan, AL, Jabbour, J, Nassar, J, Dahouk, I, Azar, ST. Vocal characteristics in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2012;269:1489–95CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Prakup, B. Acoustic measures of the voices of older singers and nonsingers. J Voice 2012;26:341–50CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Karlamangla, A, Tinetti, M, Guralnik, J, Studenski, S, Wetle, T, Reuben, D. Comorbidity in older adults: nosology of impairment, diseases, and conditions. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci 2007;62:296300CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sinclair, A, Morley, JE, Rodriguez-Mañas, L, Paolisso, G, Bayer, T, Zeyfang, A et al. Diabetes mellitus in older people: position statement on behalf of the International Association of Gerontology and Geriatrics (IAGG), the European Diabetes Working Party for Older People (EDWPOP), and the International Task Force of Experts in Diabetes. J Am Med Dir Assoc 2012;13:497502CrossRefGoogle Scholar
International Diabetes Federation. IDF Atlas, 7th edn. Brussels: International Diabetes Federation, 2015Google Scholar
Sesti, G, Antonelli Incalzi, R, Bonora, E, Consoli, A, Giaccari, A, Maggi, S et al. Management of diabetes in older adults. Nutr Metab Cardiovasc Dis 2018;28:206–18CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
St-Onge, MP, Gallagher, D. Body composition changes with aging: the cause or the result of alterations in metabolic rate and macronutrient oxidation? Nutrition 2010;26:152–5CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Buffa, R, Floris, GU, Putzu, PF, Marini, E. Body composition variations in ageing. Coll Antropol 2011;35:259–65Google ScholarPubMed
Kim, CH, Kim, HK, Kim, EH, Bae, SJ, Park, JY. Association between changes in body composition and risk of developing type 2 diabetes in Koreans. Diabet Med 2014;31:1393–8CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Perry, BD, Caldow, MK, Brennan-Speranza, TC, Sbaraglia, M, Jerums, G, Garnham, A et al. Muscle atrophy in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: roles of inflammatory pathways, physical activity and exercise. Exerc Immunol Rev 2016;22:94109Google ScholarPubMed