Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7czq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T11:13:16.976Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Pre-operative considerations in aesthetic facial surgery

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 January 2014

V Veer ,
L Jackson ,
N Kara  and
M Hawthorne
V Veer*
Affiliation:
Department of Otolaryngology, James Cook University Hospital, Middlesbrough, UK
L Jackson
Affiliation:
Department of Otolaryngology, Gloucestershire Royal Hospital, Gloucester, UK
N Kara
Affiliation:
Department of Otolaryngology, James Cook University Hospital, Middlesbrough, UK
M Hawthorne
Affiliation:
Department of Otolaryngology, James Cook University Hospital, Middlesbrough, UK
*
Address for correspondence: Mr Vik Veer, 5 Edlingham Close, South Gosforth, Newcastle NE3 1RH, UK E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This article reviews the common pitfalls in the complex process of pre-operative assessment for facial plastic surgery. Legal guidelines and best practice are discussed, and attention is directed mainly towards the consenting and psychological issues surrounding this area of surgery.

Keywords

AestheticsInformed ConsentPsychological Phenomena and ProcessesBody Dysmorphic DisordersPreoperative Period
Type
Review Articles
Information
The Journal of Laryngology & Otology , Volume 128 , Issue 1 , January 2014 , pp. 22 - 28
Copyright
Copyright © JLO (1984) Limited 2014 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1Krieger, LM, Shaw, WW. The effect of increased plastic surgery supply on fees for aesthetic surgery: an economic analysis. Plast Reconstr Surg 1999;104:559–63Google Scholar
2Liu, TS, Miller, TA. Economic analysis of the future growth of cosmetic surgery procedures. Plast Reconstr Surg 2008;121:404–12eCrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
3Horowitz, MD, Rosensweig, JA, Jones, CA. Medical tourism: globalization of the healthcare marketplace. Med Gen Med 2007;13:33Google Scholar
4York, D. Medical tourism: the trend toward outsourcing medical procedures to foreign countries. J Contin Educ Health Prof 2008;28:99–102Google Scholar
5Sarwer, DB, Wadden, TA, Pertschuk, MJ, Whitaker, LA. The psychology of cosmetic surgery: a review and reconceptualization. Clin Psychol Rev 1998;18:1–22CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
6Harris, DL. The symptomatology of abnormal appearance: an anecdotal survey. Br J Plast Surg 1982;35:312–23Google Scholar
7Harris, D. The benefits and hazards of cosmetic surgery. Br J Hosp Med 1989;41:543–5Google ScholarPubMed
8Ifeacho, SN, Pothier, DD. A comparative analysis of the litigation rate against the NHS following rhinoplasty by otorhinolaryngologists and plastic surgeons. Clin Otolaryngol 2009;34:177–8Google Scholar
9Bradbury, E. The psychology of aesthetic plastic surgery. Aesthetic Plast Surg 1994;18:301–5Google Scholar
10Gorney, M. Recognition of the patient unsuitable for aesthetic surgery. Aesthet Surg J 2007;27:626–9Google Scholar
11Sykes, JM. Managing the psychological aspects of plastic surgery patients. Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2009;17:321–5Google Scholar
12Correa, AJ, Sykes, JM, Ries, WR. Considerations before rhinoplasty. Otolaryngol Clin North Am 1999;32:7–14Google Scholar
13Harris, D. Re: Taking a history in aesthetic surgery: SAGA–the surgeon's tool for patient selection, by V.F. Blackburn, A.V. Blackburn, Journal of Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgery, 2008; 61:723–729. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2009;62:117Google Scholar
14Gorney, M. Claims prevention for the aesthetic surgeon: preparing for the less-than-perfect outcome. Facial Plast Surg 2002;18:135–42Google Scholar
15Mowlavi, A, Lille, S, Andrews, K, Yashar, S, Schoeller, T, Wechselberger, G et al. Psychiatric patients who desire aesthetic surgery: identifying the problem patient. Ann Plast Surg 2000;44:97–106CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
16Veale, D. Body dysmorphic disorder. Postgrad Med J 2004;80:67–71Google Scholar
17National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence: Obsessive-compulsive disorder. In: http://www.nice.org.uk/nicemedia/pdf/cg031niceguideline.pdf [1 January 2013]Google Scholar
18World Health Organization: ICD-10 Version:2010. In: http://apps.who.int/classifications/apps/icd/icd10online/ [1 January 2013]Google Scholar
19Hessler, JL, Moyer, CA, Kim, JC, Baker, SR, Moyer, JS. Predictors of satisfaction with facial plastic surgery: results of a prospective study. Arch Facial Plast Surg 2010;12:192–6Google Scholar
20Reiter, D. Facial plastic surgical outcomes and clinical depression. Arch Facial Plast Surg 2010;12:434–5Google Scholar
21Rosenberger, PH, Jokl, P, Ickovics, J. Psychosocial factors and surgical outcomes: an evidence-based literature review. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 2006;14:397–405Google Scholar
22Lupton, M. Informed consent: can a patient ever be fully informed? Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol 2005;17:601–4Google Scholar
23Grubb, A. Medical Law. “Informed consent” to medical treatment: who decides, the patient or the doctor? The Cambridge Law Journal 1985;44:199–202Google Scholar
24Rothman, NL, Rothman, DA. Informed consent. An update. J Nurs Adm 1985;15:28–31CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
25Jackson, E. Medical Law: Text, Cases, and Materials, 2nd edn.New York: Oxford University Press, 2010Google Scholar
26Consent: patients and doctors making decisions together 2008. In: http://www.gmc-uk.org/static/documents/content/Consent_-_English_0911.pdf [1 January 2013]Google Scholar
27Consent: patients and doctors making decisions together 2008, sections 13–17. In: http://www.gmc-uk.org/static/documents/content/Consent_-_English_0911.pdf [1 January 2013]Google Scholar
28McGaughey, I. Informed consent and knee arthroscopies: an evaluation of patient understanding and satisfaction. Knee 2004;11:237–42CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
29Eggers, C, Obliers, R, Koerfer, A, Koehle, K, Hoelscher, AH, Bollschweiler, E. A multimedia tool for the informed consent of patients prior to gastric banding. Obesity 2007;15:2866–73Google Scholar
30Keulers, BJ, Keulers, CF, Spauwen, PH, Haupt, P. Can face-to-face patient education be replaced by computer-based patient education? A randomised trial. Patient Educ Couns 2007;67:176–82CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
31Moseley, TH, Wiggins, MN, O'Sullivan, P. Effects of presentation method on the understanding of informed consent. Br J Ophthalmol 2006;90:990–3CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
32Danino, AM, Lile, A, Moutel, G. Visual documentation of oral consent: a new method of informed consent before major gigantomastia reduction for an illiterate population. Plast Reconstr Surg 2006;117:1370–1Google Scholar
33Rossi, MJ, Guttmann, D, MacLennan, MJ, Lubowitz, JH. Video informed consent improves knee arthroscopy patient comprehension. Arthroscopy 2005;21:739–43Google Scholar
34Mason, V, McEwan, A, Walker, D, Barrett, S, James, D. The use of video information in obtaining consent for female sterilisation: a randomised study. BJOG 2003;110:1062–71Google Scholar
35Consent: patients and doctors making decisions together 2008, section 11. In: http://www.gmc-uk.org/Consent___English_0513.pdf_48903482.pdf [1 January 2013]Google Scholar
36Bolam v Friern Hospital Management Committee [1957] 1 WLR 582Google Scholar
37Bolitho v City and Hackney Health Authority [1997] 4 All ER 771Google Scholar
38Sidaway v Governors of Bethlem Royal Hospital [1985] 1 AC 871Google Scholar
39Chester v Afshar [2004] 3 WLR 927Google Scholar
40Institute of Medical Illustrators: National Guidelines. In: http://www.imi.org.uk/natguidelines/guidelines01.asp [1 January 2013]Google Scholar
41Swamy, RS, Sykes, JM, Most, SP. Principles of photography in rhinoplasty for the digital photographer. Clin Plast Surg 2010;37:213–21Google Scholar
42Ahluwalia, S, Veer, V, Kenyon, GS. Lateral photography of the nasal tip: what is acceptable and can it be improved? Plast Reconstr Surg 2010;126:250–2eGoogle Scholar
43Department of Health. Confidentiality: NHS Code of Practice. London: Department of Health, 2003Google Scholar
44The National Archives: Data Protection Act 1998. In: http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1998/29/contents [1 January 2013]Google Scholar
45Taylor, D McG, Foster, E, Dunkin, CS, Fitzgerald, AM. A study of the personal use of digital photography within plastic surgery. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2008;61:37–40Google Scholar
46Nouraei, SA, Frame, J, Nduka, C. Uses and abuses of digital imaging in plastic surgery. Int J Surg 2005;3:254–7Google Scholar
47Mahajan, AY, Shafiei, M, Marcus, BC. Analysis of patient-determined preoperative computer imaging. Arch Facial Plast Surg 2009;11:290–5Google Scholar
48General Medical Council: Conflicts of interest (September 2008). In: http://www.gmc-uk.org/Conflicts_of_interest_Archived_22_April.pdf_51834337.pdf [4 November 2013]Google Scholar
49Ward, CM. Consenting and consulting for cosmetic surgery. Br J Plast Surg 1998;51:547–50Google Scholar
50General Medical Practice: Good Practice in Prescribing Medicines (September 2008), section 8–9. In: http://www.gmc-uk.org/Good_Practice_in_Prescribing_Medicines_0911_withdrawn.pdf_51291115.pdf [4 November 2013]Google Scholar
51General Medical Council: Good Medical Practice. In: http://www.gmc-uk.org/Good_Medical_Practice___Archived.pdf_51772200.pdf [4 November 2013]Google Scholar
52General Medical Council: Domain 1: Knowledge, skills and practice. In: http://www.gmc-uk.org/guidance/good_medical_practice/knowledge_skills_performance.asp [November 2013]Google Scholar