Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t8hqh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-30T05:12:05.725Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Physiological tympanostomy

A new technique of middle ear ventilation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 June 2007

V. K. Misurya
Affiliation:
Department of Ear, Nose and Throat, M.L.B. Medical CollegeJhansi (U.P.), India

Summary

PHYSIOLOGICAL tympanostomy is advanced as a ‘substitute’ eustachian tube because it opens regularly only on swallowing, as does the ‘natural’ eustachian tube. The efficacy of the physiological tympanostomy operation was first proved in experimental animals (two dogs). Subsequently, six patients with eustachian insufficiency were successfully managed by this new surgical technique within period of one year, with no post-operative complications. The hearing improved and the middle ears remained air-filled.

The method seems to have the following merits: permanent ventilation of the tympanum with preservation of an intact drum (from the functional point of view); no tympanophonia or autophonia; simple technique, short operative period (five minutes); no risk of postoperative complications; and no danger of ascending infection of the middle ear from the ear canal. The demerits appear to be: drainage not ensured; no facility to increase the middle ear pressure by the Valsalva manoeuvre or, Politzerization.

Type
Clinical records
Copyright
Copyright © JLO (1984) Limited 1975

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Armstrong, B. W. (1954) Archives of Otolaryngology, 59, 653.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bezold, F. (1894) Quoted by Politzer, A. Diseases of the Ear. Lea Brothers, Philadelphia.Google Scholar
Drettner, B. and Ekvall, L. (1969) The Otolaryngologic Clinics of North America, 90, 122.Google Scholar
Graves, G. D. and Edwards, L. E. (1944) Archives of Otolaryngology, 39, 359.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
House, W. F. and Miles, J. (1969) Laryngoscope, 79, 1765.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lapidot, A. and Kapila, B. (1967) Archives of Otolaryngology, 86, 490.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lupin, A. J. (1969) Annals of Otology, Rhinology and Laryngology, 78, 792.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller, G. F. (1965) Archives of Otolaryngology, 81, 41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Misurya, V. K. (1975) Journal of Laryngology and Otology, 34, 189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rich, A. R. (1920) Bulletin of Johns Hopkins Hospital, 31, 206.Google Scholar
Siirala, V. (1964) Archives of Otolaryngology, 80, 287.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Silverstein, H. (1966) Transactions of American Academy of Ophthalmology and Otolaryngology, 70, 640.Google Scholar