Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-lnqnp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T04:56:05.087Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Objective assessment of endoscopic sinus surgery in the management of chronic rhinosinusitis: an update

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 June 2007

Valerie J. Lund  and
Glenis K. Scadding
Valerie J. Lund*
Affiliation:
Rhinology Research Clinic, Institute of Laryngology and Otology, London.
Glenis K. Scadding
Affiliation:
Royal National Throat, Nose and Ear Hospital, London.
*
Miss Valerie J. Lund, M.S., F.R.C.S., F.R.C.S.Ed., Reader in Rhinology, Professorial Unit, Royal National Throat, Nose and Ear Hospital, 330/332 Gray's Inn Road, London WC1X 8DA.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Whilst clinical success of endoscopic surgery for chronic rhinosinusitis has necessarily depended primarily upon subjective evaluation, a range of objective techniques are now available which may facilitate our interpretation of results. A group of 200 patients underwent assessment of symptoms by sequential visual analogue scoring, olfaction by qualitative and quantitative testing, nasal airflow by forced inspiratory peak flow, anterior rhinomanometry, nasomucociliary function by ciliary beat frequency and nasal topography by acoustic rhinometry performed pre- and post-operatively. Significant improvement was demonstrated in all symptoms examined, olfactory tests and ciliary beat frequency whilst acoustic rhinometry provided an attempt to quantify the surgical cavities. These results offer an interesting perspective on the pathology of rhinosinusitis and the rationale for surgery within the ostiomeatal complex.

Keywords

Surgeryendoscopic sinusResultsobjective
Type
Main Articles
Information
The Journal of Laryngology & Otology , Volume 108 , Issue 9 , September 1994 , pp. 749 - 753
Copyright
Copyright © JLO (1984) Limited 1994

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Amoore, J. E. (1992) Odor standards in squeeze bottle kits for matching quality and intensity. Water Science and Technology 25: 1–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Doty, R. L., Shaman, P., Dann, M. (1984) Development of the University of Pennsylvania Smell Identification Test; a standardized microencapsulated test of olfactory function. Physiology and Behaviour 32: 489–502.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feldman, C., Read, R., Rutman, R., Jeffery, P. K., Brain, A., Lund, V., Mitchell, T. J., Andrew, P. W., Boulnois, G. J.. Todd, H. C.Cole, P. J., Wilson, R. (1992) The interaction of Streptococcus pneumoniae with intact human respiratory mucosa in vitro. European Respiratory Journal 5: 576–583.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fisher, E. E, Lund, V. J., Scadding, G. K. (1994) Acoustic rhinometry in rhinological practice. Proceedings of Royal Society of Medicine 87: 411–413.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Greenstone, M., Logan-Sinclair, R., Cole, P. J., (1984) An automated method of recording ciliary beat frequency. International Research Communications System. Medical Science 12: 715–716.Google Scholar
Grymer, L. E, Hilberg, O., Pedersen, O. F, Rasmussen, T. R. (1991) Acoustic rhinometry: values from adults with subjective normal nasal patency. Rhinology 29: 35–39.Google ScholarPubMed
Haight, J. S. J., Cole, P. (1983) The site and function of the nasal valve. Laryngoscope 93: 49–55.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hilberg, O., Jackson, A. C, Swift, D. L. (1989) Acoustic rhinometry: evaluation of nasal cavity geometry by acoustic deflections. Journal of Applied Physiology 66: 295–303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hoffman, D. E, May, M., Mester, S. J. (1990) Functional endoscopic sinus surgery - experience with the initial 100 patients. American Journal of Rhinology 4: 129–132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jones, A. S.. Lancer, J. M.. Stevens, J. C.Beckingham, E. (1987) Nasal resistance to airflow: its measurement, normal parameters and reproducibility. Journal of Laryngology and Otology 101: 800–808.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jones, A. S., Willat, D. J., Durham, L. M. (1989) Nasal airflow: resistance and sensation. Journal of Laryngology and Otology 103: 909–911.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kennedy, D. W. (1992) Prognostic factors, outcomes and staging in ethmoid sinus surgery. Laryngoscope 102 (Suppl 57): 1–18.Google ScholarPubMed
Lazar, R. H., Younis, R. T, Long, T. E. (1993) Functional endonasal sinus surgery in adults and children. Laryngoscope 103: 1–5.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Levine, H. L. (1990) Functional endoscopic sinus surgery: evaluation, surgery and follow-up of 250 patients. Laryngoscope 100: 79–84.Google ScholarPubMed
Lund, V. J., Holmstrom, M., Scadding, G. K. (1991) Functional endoscopic sinus surgery in the management of chronic rhinosinusitis. An objective assessment. Journal of Laryngology and Otology 105: 832–835.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lund, V. J. (1993) The results of inferior and middle meatal antrostomy under endoscopic control. Acta Otorhinolaryngologica Belgica 47: 65–71.Google ScholarPubMed
Lund, V. J., Mackay, I. S. (1993) Staging in rhinosinusitis. Rhinology 31: 183–184.Google Scholar
Lund, V. J., Mackay, I. S. (1994) Outcome assessment of endoscopic sinus surgery. Proceedings of Royal Society of Medicine 87: 70–72.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Read, R., Wilson, R., Rutman, A., Lund, V., Todd, H. C, Brain, A., Jeffery, P. K.. Cole, P. J. (1991) Interaction of nontypable Haemophilus influenzae with human respiratory mucosa in vitro. Journal of Infectious Disease 163: 549–558.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rice, D. H. (1989) Endoscopic sinus surgery: results at two-year follow-up. Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery 101: 476–479.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rutland, J., Dewar, A., Cox, T., Cole, P. (1982) Nasal brushing for the study of ciliary ultrastructure. Journal of Clinical Pathology 35: 357–359.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schaefer, S. D., Manning, S., Close, L. G. (1989) Endoscopic paranasal sinus surgery; indications and considerations. Laryngoscope 99: 1–5.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schaitkin, B., May, M., Shapiro, A., Fucci, M., Mester, S. J. (1993) Endoscopic sinus surgery: Four-year follow-up on the first 100 patients. Laryngoscope 103: 1117–1120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stammberger, H. (1985) Endoscopic endonasal surgery - new concepts in the treatment of recurring sinusitis. Part II: Surgical technique. Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery 94: 143–147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stammberger, H., Posawetz, W. (1990) Functional endoscopic sinus surgery: concept, indications and results of the Messerklinger technique. European Archives of Otorhinolarvngology 240: 63–76.Google Scholar
Stammberger, H. (1991). Functional Endoscopic Sinus Surgery B. C. Decker, Philadelphia, pp. 459–465.Google Scholar
Yamagishi, M., Hasegawa, S., Suzuki, S., Nakamura, H., Nakano, Y. (1989) Effect of surgical treatment of olfactory disturbance caused by localized ethmoiditis. Clinical Otolaryngology 14: 405–409.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Youlten, L. J. F. (1980) The peak nasal inspiratory flow meter: a new instrument for the assessment of the response to immunotherapy in seasonal allergic rhinitis. Allergologia et Immunopatholoqia 8: 344–352.Google Scholar