Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2plfb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T01:54:55.426Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Middle-ear analysis in the nose/ear distress syndrome

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 June 2007

W. D. McNicoll  and
Royal Navy
W. D. McNicoll
Affiliation:
Yoyal NavyHaslar
Royal Navy
Affiliation:
Yoyal NavyHaslar
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The Nose/Ear Distress Syndrome is defined as ‘the combination of nasal septal deformity and eustachian dysfunction in the absence of any other pathology’ (McNicoll and Scanlan, 1979).

One hundred and two recruits to the Submarine, Diving and Aircrew branches of the Royal Navy, who at initial assessment had been found to have an intact, immobile tympanic membrane, when the Valsalva, Toynbee or Politzer manoeuvers were performed, were referred to the ORL Department, Royal Navy Hospital, Haslar, for further assessment as to their ability to serve in environments of primarily increased ambient pressure.

Forty-two qualified members of the Submarine and Diving Branches acted as controls, and they were known to have positive eustachian function, and also clinically mobile tympanic membranes on performance of the Valsalva manoeuvre.

Both groups underwent middle-ear analysis, using a Grason Stadler 1723 Middle-Ear Analyser, which has an additional facility for testing eustachian tube function.

Those subjects not in the control group were subjected to an increase in ambient pressure in the compression chamber at HMS Dolphin. The ability to equilibrate an increase in ambient pressure of 10 meters of water was regarded as the ultimate criterion of positive eustachian function, those who were unable to do this were diagnosed as suffering from the Nose/Ear Distress Syndrome.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Journal of Laryngology & Otology , Volume 96 , Issue 4 , April 1982 , pp. 309 - 323
Copyright
Copyright © JLO (1984) Limited 1982

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Armstrong, H. G. and Heim, J. W. (1937) The effect of flight on the middle ear. Journal of the American Medical Association, 109: 417–421.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Diamant, M. (1940) Otitis and pneumatisation of the mastoid bone. Acta Otolaryngologica, Supplement 41: 1.Google Scholar
Feldman, A. S. (1975) Acoustic impedance-admittance measurements. Physiological Measures of the Audio-Vestibular System. New York, Academic Press.Google Scholar
Flisberg, K. (1966) Ventilatory studies in the eustachian tube. Acta Otolaryngologica, Supplement 219, 5–82.Google ScholarPubMed
Flisberg, K., Ingelstedt, S. and Ortegren, U. (1963) On middle-ear pressure. Acta Otolaryngologica, 182: 43–56.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Holmgren, L. (1940) Experimental tubal occlusion. Acta Otolaryngologica, 28: 587–592.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holmquist, J. (1976) Eustachian tube anatomy and physiology. Journal of the American Audiological Society, Vol. 2 No. 4, 115–119.Google Scholar
Holmquist, J. and Miller, J. (1972) Eustachian tube evaluation using the impedance bridge. Mayo Foundation Impedance Symposium, p. 297.Google Scholar
Ingelstedt, S., Ivarsson, A., Tjernström, O. (1974) Vertigo due to relative overpressure in the middle ear. Acta Otolaryngologica, 78: 1–14.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ingelstedt, S. and Jonson, B. (1967) Mechanism of gas exchange in the normal human ear. Acta Otolaryngologica, Supplement 224: 452–461.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jerger, J., Jerger, S. and Maudlin, L. (1972) Studies in impedance audiometry. Archives of Otolaryngology, 95: 513–523.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lundgren, C. E. G. (1965) Alternobaric vertigo among pilots. Aerospace Medicine, pp. 31–78.Google Scholar
McNicoll, W. D. and Scanlan, S. G. (1979) Submucous resection: The treatment of choice in the Nose/Ear Distress Syndrome. Journal of Laryngology and Otology, 93: 357/367.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rerlman, H. B. (1943) Quantitative tubal function. Archives of Otolaryngology, 38: 453–465.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Perlman, H. B. (1967) Normal tubal function. Archives of Otolaryngology, 86: 632–638.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Porter, T. (1972) Normative otoadmittance values for three populations. Journal of Audiological Research, 12: 1.Google Scholar
Rock, E. H. (1974) Practical otologic applications and considerations in impedance audiometry. Impedance Newsletter American Electromedics, Supplement 3.Google Scholar
Tjernström, O. (1974) Further studies of alternobaric vertigo-posture and passive equilibration of middle-ear pressure. Acta Otolaryngologica, 30: 212–238.Google Scholar
Van Dishoeck, H. A. E. (1952) Tubal disorders and the pneumophone. Acta Otolaryngologica, 41: 196–203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar