Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-r5fsc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T12:20:34.332Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Is the use of a bone conduction hearing device on a softband a useful tool in the pre-operative assessment of suitability for other hearing implants?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 July 2018

P M Spielmann ,
R Roplekar ,
C Rae ,
F Ahmed  and
S E M Jones
P M Spielmann
Affiliation:
University Department of Otolaryngology, Ninewells Hospital and Medical School, Dundee, Scotland, UK
R Roplekar
Affiliation:
Department of Otolaryngology, Luton and Dunstable Hospital, UK
C Rae
Affiliation:
Department of Audiology, Kings Cross Hospital, Dundee, Scotland, UK
F Ahmed
Affiliation:
Department of Audiology, Kings Cross Hospital, Dundee, Scotland, UK
S E M Jones*
Affiliation:
University Department of Otolaryngology, Ninewells Hospital and Medical School, Dundee, Scotland, UK
*
Author for correspondence: Mr Stephen E M Jones, University Department of Otolaryngology, Ninewells Hospital and Medical School, Dundee DD1 9SY, Scotland, UK E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Objective

To assess whether pre-operative assessment with a bone conduction hearing device on a softband is an accurate predictor of performance with one of two transcutaneous hearing implants.

Study design

Cohort study comparing pre-and post-operative speech audiometry using correlation analysis.

Methods

Pre-operative pure tone audiometry and aided half optimum speech recognition thresholds were compared with post-operative aided results for each ear that had undergone implantation. Data were collected prospectively.

Results

Full data were available in 24 ears. In 19 out of 24 ears (79 per cent), the difference between pre- and post-operative speech scores was less than 10 dB, demonstrating a good clinical correlation. The Pearson correlation coefficient was calculated at 0.66 (95 per cent confidence interval = 0.357–0.842), indicating a strong statistical correlation.

Conclusion

Pre-operative softband testing shows good clinical correlation and strong statistical correlation with hearing implant performance. The findings suggest there is value in using the test to predict performance and guide patients’ expectations.

Keywords

Hearing LossBone Conduction HearingImplantMiddle Ear
Type
Main Articles
Information
The Journal of Laryngology & Otology , Volume 132 , Issue 6 , June 2018 , pp. 505 - 508
Copyright
Copyright © JLO (1984) Limited, 2018 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

Mr S E M Jones takes responsibility for the integrity of the content of the paper

References

1Ihler, F, Bewarder, J, Blum, J, Matthias, C, Canis, M. Long-term functional outcome and satisfaction of patients with an active middle ear implant for sensorineural hearing loss compared to a matched population with conventional hearing aids. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2014;271:3161–9Google Scholar
2Monini, S, Filippi, C, Atturo, F, Biagini, M, Lazzarino, AI, Barbara, M. Individualised headband simulation test for predicting outcome after percutaneous bone conductive implantation. Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital 2015;35:258–64Google Scholar
3Pfiffner, F, Kompis, M, Stieger, C. Bone-anchored hearing aids: correlation between pure-tone thresholds and outcome in three user groups. Otol Neurotol 2009;30:884–90Google Scholar
4Kara, A, Iseri, M, Durgut, M, Topdag, M, Ozturk, M. Comparing audiological test results obtained from a sound processor attached to a softband with direct and magnetic passive bone conduction hearing implant systems. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2016;273:4193–8Google Scholar
5Rainsbury, JW, Williams, BA, Gulliver, M, Morris, DP. Preoperative headband assessment for semi-implantable bone conduction hearing devices in conductive hearing loss: is it useful or misleading? Otol Neurotol 2015;36:e58–62CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
6Monini, S, Filippi, C, Atturo, F, Barbara, M. Is the bone-conduction headband test useful for predicting the functional outcome of a round window active middle ear implant? Otol Neurotol 2013;34:1329–35Google Scholar
7R Core Team. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing [computer program]. Vienna: R Foundation for Statistical Computing, 2016Google Scholar
8Heywood, RL, Patel, PM, Jonathan, DA. Comparison of hearing thresholds obtained with Baha preoperative assessment tools and those obtained with the osseointegrated implant. Ear Nose Throat J 2011;90:E21–7CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed