Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-p9bg8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T16:23:37.640Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Investigation of demodex species frequency in patients with a persistent itchy ear canal treated with a local steroid

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 July 2014

C Cevik ,
O Aycan Kaya ,
E Akbay ,
E Yula ,
E Yengil ,
M I Gulmez  and
E Akoglu
C Cevik*
Affiliation:
Department of Otolaryngology, Mustafa Kemal University School of Medicine, Antakya, Turkey
O Aycan Kaya
Affiliation:
Department of Parasitology, Mustafa Kemal University School of Medicine, Antakya, Turkey
E Akbay
Affiliation:
Department of Otolaryngology, Mustafa Kemal University School of Medicine, Antakya, Turkey
E Yula
Affiliation:
Department of Medical Microbiology, Mustafa Kemal University School of Medicine, Antakya, Turkey
E Yengil
Affiliation:
Department of Family Medicine, Mustafa Kemal University School of Medicine, Antakya, Turkey
M I Gulmez
Affiliation:
Department of Otolaryngology, Mustafa Kemal University School of Medicine, Antakya, Turkey
E Akoglu
Affiliation:
Department of Otolaryngology, Mustafa Kemal University School of Medicine, Antakya, Turkey
*
Address for correspondence: Dr Cengiz Çevik, Department of Otolaryngology, Mustafa Kemal University School of Medicine, Serinyol, Hatay, Turkey Fax: +90 (326) 245 56 54 E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Objective:

To investigate the frequency of demodex species in the external acoustic meatus in patients with an itchy ear canal.

Methods:

Patients were assigned to one of three groups. Group one consisted of 54 patients with an itchy ear canal who were using a local agent, while group two was composed of 51 patients with an itchy ear canal who were not using a local agent. Group three consisted of 50 healthy individuals without an itchy ear canal.

Results:

Demodex species test results were positive in nine (5.8 per cent) of the cases. Six of these positive cases were in group one, two in group two and one in group three. The frequency of demodex species in the external acoustic meatus was similar between those patients with an itchy ear canal who did not use a local agent and the healthy individuals (p = 0.571), but it was significantly higher in those using a local steroid compared with those not using a local agent (p = 0.046).

Conclusion:

Although demodex species was not significantly higher in patients with an itchy ear canal compared with the control group, use of a local steroid increased the parasite frequency in the external ear canal of affected patients.

Keywords

External Acoustic CanalMitesCorticosteroids
Type
Main Articles
Information
The Journal of Laryngology & Otology , Volume 128 , Issue 8 , August 2014 , pp. 698 - 701
Copyright
Copyright © JLO (1984) Limited 2014 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

Presented as a poster at the 35th General Meeting of Turkish Society of Microbiology, 3–7 November 2012, Aydin, Turkey.

References

1White, RD, Ananthakrishnan, G, McKean, SA, Brunton, JN, Hussain, SS, Sudarshan, TA. Masses and disease entities of the external auditory canal: radiological and clinical correlation. Clin Radiol 2012;67:172–81Google Scholar
2Stroman, DW, Roland, PS, Dohar, J, Burt, W. Microbiology of normal external auditory canal. Laryngoscope 2001;111:2054–9CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
3Pabla, L, Jindal, M, Latif, K. The management of otitis externa in UK general practice. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2012;269:753–6Google Scholar
4Li, LY, Cruz, PD Jr.Allergic contact dermatitis: pathophysiology applied to future therapy. Dermatol Ther 2004;17:219–23Google Scholar
5King, WP. Allergic disorders in the otolaryngologic practice. Otolaryngol Clin North Am 1985;18:677–90CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
6Aycan, OM, Otlu, GH, Karaman, U, Daldal, N, Atambay, M. Frequency of the appearance of Demodex sp. in various patient and age groups [in Turkish]. Turkiye Parazitol Derg 2007;31:115–18Google Scholar
7Baima, B, Sticherling, M. Demodicidosis revisited. Acta Derm Venereol 2002;82:3–6CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
8Magro, CM, Crowson, AN. Necrotizing eosinophilic folliculitis as a manifestation of the atopic diathesis. Int J Dermatol 2000;39:672–7CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
9Roland, PS, Marple, BF. Disorders of the external auditory canal. J Am Acad Audiol 1997;8:367–78Google Scholar
10Liu, J, Sheha, H, Tseng, SC. Pathogenic role of Demodex mites in blepharitis. Curr Opin Allergy Clin Immunol 2010;10:505–10CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
11Dong, H, Duncan, LD. Cytologic findings in Demodex folliculitis: a case report and review of the literature. Diagn Cytopathol 2006;34:232–4Google Scholar
12Ding, Y, Huang, X. Investigation of external auditory meatus secretion Demodex folliculorum and Demodex brevis infection in college students [in Chinese]. Lin Chuang Er Bi Yan Hou Ke Za Zhi 2005;19:176–7Google Scholar
13Pena, GP, Andrade Filho, JS. Is demodex really non-pathogenic? Rev Inst Med Trop Sao Paulo 2000;42:171–3Google Scholar
14Lacey, N, Kavanagh, K, Tseng, SC. Under the lash: Demodex mites in human diseases. Biochem (Lond) 2009;31:2–6Google Scholar
15Baima, B, Sticherling, M. Demodicidosis revisited. Acta Derm Venereol 2002;82:3–6Google Scholar
16Bevins, CL, Liu, FT. Rosacea: skin innate immunity gone awry? Nat Med 2007;13:904–6CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
17Firat, PY, Geçıt, İ, Depecık, F, Karadan, M, Karci, E, Karaman, Ü et al. Demodex spp. positivity among laboratory staff, kitchen staff, cleaning workers and nurses working in a state hospital [in Turkish]. Turkiye Parazitol Derg 2010;34:164–7Google Scholar
18Djalilian, HR, Memar, O. Topical pimecrolimus 1% for the treatment of pruritic external auditory canals. Laryngoscope 2006;116:1809–12Google Scholar
19Sibenge, S, Gawkrodger, DJ. Rosacea: a study of clinical patterns, blood flow, and the role of D. folliculorum. J Am Acad Dermatol 1992;26:590–3Google Scholar