Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-mlc7c Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-16T15:16:48.707Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Inner ear cholesteatoma and the preservation of cochlear function

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 June 2007

Roberto Gamoletti ,
Mario Sanna ,
Carlo Zini ,
Abdel-Kader Taibah ,
Enrico Pasanisi  and
Luca Vassalli
Roberto Gamoletti*
Affiliation:
Parma, Italy
Mario Sanna
Affiliation:
Parma, Italy
Carlo Zini
Affiliation:
Parma, Italy
Abdel-Kader Taibah
Affiliation:
Parma, Italy
Enrico Pasanisi
Affiliation:
Parma, Italy
Luca Vassalli
Affiliation:
Parma, Italy
*
Via Fatebenefratelli 20, 20075 Lodi (Mi)—Italy.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Labyrinthine destruction by direct cholesteatoma invasion has always been considered a serious threat to the inner ear function.

A number of reports in the literature have cited both patients who had preservation of hearing despite widespread erosion of the labyrinth by cholesteatoma and patients who had retained auditory function despite surgical removal of the matrix from the labyrinth. In most cases the vestibular portion of the inner ear was invaded but cases of cochlear involvement have been described as well.

Twelve cases with pre-operative auditory function preservation despite extensive labyrinthine destruction treated at our Institution are reported. Seven cases retained cochlear function post-operatively.

Possible explanations of this occurrence and implications of related with hearing preservation in the presence of widespread inner ear destruction by chronic inflammatory disease are discussed.

Type
Main Articles
Information
The Journal of Laryngology & Otology , Volume 104 , Issue 12 , December 1990 , pp. 945 - 948
Copyright
Copyright © JLO (1984) Limited 1990

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bagger-Sjoback, D. (1984) Inner ear cholesteatoma with preserved hearing. Journal of Laryngology and Otology, 98: 1131–1134.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bagger-Sjoback, D., Phelps, P. D. (1985) Cholesteatoma with extension to the cochlea. American Journal of Otology, 6: 338–343.Google ScholarPubMed
Bast, T. H., Eyster, J. A. (1935) cited in Schuknecht H. F. and Belal A. (1975) The utricolo-endolymphatic valve: its functional significance. Journal of Laryngology and Otology, 89: 985–996.Google Scholar
Bateman, G. H. (1952) A case of successful restoration of the hearing by fenestration in spite of damage to the membranous external semicircular canal. Journal of Laryngology and Otology, 66: 572–573.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bumsted, R. M.Dolan, K. D., Sadé, J., McCabe, B. F. (1977) Preservation of cochlear function after extensive labyrinthine destruction. Annals of Otology, Rhinology and Laryngology, 86: 131–137.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cullen, J. R., Kerr, A. G. (1986) latrogenic fenestration of a semicircular canal: a method of closure. Laryngoscope, 96: 1168–1169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jahrsdoerfer, R. A., Johns, M. E., Cantrell, R. W. (1978) Labyrinthine trauma during ear surgery. Laryngoscope, 88: 1589–1595.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jenkins, G. J. (1911) Labyrinthine vertigo treated by operation. Proceedings Royal Society of Medicine, IV: 116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jongkees, L. B. W. (1950) On the function of the labyrinth after destruction of the horizontal canal. Acta Otolaryngologica, 38: 505–510.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Palva, T., Karja, T.Palva, A. (1976) Immediate and short term complications of chronic ear surgery. Archives of Otolaryngology, 102: 137–139.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Phelps, P. D. (1969) Preservation of hearing in the labyrinth invaded by cholesteatoma. Journal of Laryngology and Otology, 83: 1111–1114.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sadé-Sadowsky, N. (1955) The damage to the membranous labyrinth during fenestration and its influence upon hearing. Journal of Laryngology and Otology, 69: 753–756.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sanna, M., Zini, C., Gamoletti, R., Taibah, A. K., Russo, A., Scandellari, R. (1988 a) Closed versus open technique in the management of labyrinthine fistulae. American Journal of Otology, 9: 470–475.Google Scholar
Sanna, M., Zini, C., Gamoletti, R., Taibah, A. K., Russo, A., Pasanisi, E. (1988 b) Cholesteatoma of the temporal bone. Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Cholesteatoma and Mastoid Surgery, Copenhagen.Google Scholar
Schuknecht, H. F., Belal, A. (1975) The utriculo-endolymphatic valve: its functional significance. Journal of Laryngology and Otology, 89: 985–996.Google Scholar
Thomas, R. (1951) Fenestration operation. Experience of first ninety-six (consecutive) cases. Journal of Laryngology and Otology, 65: 259–274.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Thomsen, J., Barefoed, C., Fleckenstein, P. (1980) Preservation of cochlear function after extensive labyrinthine destruction. Journal of Laryngology and Otology, 94: 263–268.Google Scholar
Vetter, H. (1952) Fenestration: technique and results. Acta Otolaryngologica, 40: 247–255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar