Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-vdxz6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T06:13:31.389Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Improvement of hearing results by bone cement fixation in endoscopic stapedotomy

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 June 2018

F N Ardiç ,
K Aykal ,
F Tümkaya ,
C O Kara  and
F Barlay
F N Ardiç*
Affiliation:
Department of Otolaryngology, Pamukkale University, Denizli, Turkey
K Aykal
Affiliation:
Department of Otolaryngology, Pamukkale University, Denizli, Turkey
F Tümkaya
Affiliation:
Department of Otolaryngology, Pamukkale University, Denizli, Turkey
C O Kara
Affiliation:
Department of Otolaryngology, Pamukkale University, Denizli, Turkey
F Barlay
Affiliation:
Department of Otolaryngology, Pamukkale University, Denizli, Turkey
*
Address for correspondence: Prof Fazıl Necdet Ardıç, Department of Otolaryngology (KBB Anabilim Dalı), School of Medicine, Pamukkale University, 20070 Denizli, Turkey Fax: +90 2582 966 001 E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Objective

This study aimed to compare the hearing results of two different stapedotomy techniques used in the clinic at different time points.

Methods

An endoscopic surgery group (group 1; n = 37) were compared retrospectively with a microscopic surgery group (group 2; n = 57). A small fenestra and Teflon piston technique were used in all patients. Bone cement was used for fixation between the prosthesis and incus in the endoscopic group only. Bone conduction threshold and air–bone gap were used as the comparison parameters.

Results

The pre-operative air–bone gap was 31.26 dB in group 1 and 32.51 dB in group 2. The post-operative air–bone gap was 8.93 dB in group 1 and 14.28 dB in group 2. There was a significant difference between the groups in post-operative air–bone gaps. There was no significant difference between the groups in post-operative bone conduction thresholds.

Conclusion

The endoscopic technique using bone cement fixation was better for closing the air–bone gap.

Keywords

Conductive Hearing LossOtosclerosisEndoscopic Ear Surgery
Type
Main Articles
Information
The Journal of Laryngology & Otology , Volume 132 , Issue 6 , June 2018 , pp. 486 - 488
Copyright
Copyright © JLO (1984) Limited, 2018 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

Prof F N Ardıç takes responsibility for the integrity of the content of the paper

Presented in part at the American Academy of Otolaryngology – Head and Neck Surgery Foundation 2016 Annual Meeting and OTO Expo, San Diego, California, USA, 2016.

References

1Declau, F, Van Spaendonck, M, Timmermans, JP, Michaels, L, Liang, J, Qiu, JP et al. Prevalence of otosclerosis in an unselected series of temporal bones. Otol Neurotol 2001;22:596–602Google Scholar
2Tarabichi, M. Endoscopic middle ear surgery. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 1999;108:39–46Google Scholar
3American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery Foundation. Committee on Hearing and Equilibrium guidelines for the evaluation of results of treatment of conductive hearing loss. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1995;113:186–7Google Scholar
4Iannella, G, Marcotullio, D, Re, M, Manno, A, Pasquariello, B, Angeletti, D et al. Endoscopic vs microscopic approach in stapes surgery: advantages in the middle ear structures visualization and trainee's point of view. J Int Adv Otol 2017;13:14–20Google Scholar
5Fang, L, Lin, H, Zhang, TY, Tan, J. Laser versus non-laser stapedotomy in otosclerosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Auris Nasus Larynx 2014;41:337–42Google Scholar
6Surmelioglu, O, Ozdemir, S, Tarkan, O, Tuncer, U, Dagkiran, M, Cetik, F. Endoscopic versus microscopic stapes surgery. Auris Nasus Larynx 2017;44:253–7Google Scholar
7Kojima, H, Komori, M, Chikazawa, S, Yaguchi, Y, Yamamoto, K, Chujo, K et al. Comparison between endoscopic and microscopic stapes surgery. Laryngoscope 2014;124:266–71Google Scholar
8Laske, RD, Röösli, C, Chatzimichalis, MV, Sim, JH, Huber, AM. The influence of prosthesis diameter in stapes surgery: a meta-analysis and systematic review of the literature. Otol Neurotol 2011;32:520–8Google Scholar
9Gungor, V, Atay, G, Bajin, MD, Yarali, M, Sarac, S, Sennaroglu, L. Comparison of various bone cement ossiculoplasty techniques and functional results. Acta Otolaryngol 2016;136:883–7Google Scholar
10Rompaey, VV, Zarowski, A, Vercruysse, JP, Somers, T, Offeciers, E. Usefulness of hydroxyapatite bone cement to overcome crimping problems in primary stapedotomy. J Int Adv Otol 2011;7:165–71Google Scholar
11Cordero, A, Benítez, S, Reyes, P, Vaca, M, Polo, R, Pérez, C et al. Ovine ear model for fully endoscopic stapedotomy training. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2015;272:2167–74CrossRefGoogle Scholar