Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rcrh6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T11:25:20.151Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Frontal osteomas: standardising therapeutic indications

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 July 2011

L M Gil-Carcedo*
Affiliation:
Department of Otolaryngology, Rio Hortega Hospital, Valladolid University Hospital, Valladolid University, Spain
E S Gil-Carcedo
Affiliation:
Department of Otolaryngology, Rio Hortega Hospital, Valladolid University Hospital, Valladolid University, Spain
L A Vallejo
Affiliation:
Department of Otolaryngology, Rio Hortega Hospital, Valladolid University Hospital, Valladolid University, Spain
J M de Campos
Affiliation:
Department of Neurosurgery, Jimenez Diaz Foundation Hospital, Autonomous University of Madrid, Spain
D Herrero
Affiliation:
Department of Otolaryngology, Rio Hortega Hospital, Valladolid University Hospital, Valladolid University, Spain
*
Address for correspondence: Dr Luis M Gil-Carcedo, Calle Teresa Gil 16, 3°, 47002 Valladolid, Spain Fax: +34 983 306231 E-mail: [email protected]

Abstract

Background:

We believe the currently accepted indications for frontal osteoma surgery are inappropriate. We propose a new osteoma classification system, below, in order to standardise surgical decisions.

Method:

Osteomas were classified based on: relationship of tumour mass to sinus size; tumour proximity to the infundibulum, destruction of sinus walls, and complications. Forty-five osteoma cases were thus classified (1971–2007), 29 of which underwent surgery (64.44 per cent).

Results:

Three stages were thus derived: I, tumour/air fraction less than one-third, tumour distant from the infundibulum, no sinusitis, and no complications (18 patients (40 per cent)); II, tumour/air fraction one-third to one-half, no infundibular obstruction, no bone destruction, no sinusitis, and no complications (six (13.33 per cent)); and III, tumour/air fraction more than one-half, partial or total infundibular obstruction, sinusitis, bone destruction, and/or complications (21 (46.67 per cent)).

Conclusion:

Study findings suggest the following surgical indications: stage I, no surgery required, implement monitoring protocol; stage II, implement monitoring protocol, surgery may be required depending on tumour severity and general patient condition; and stage III, surgery always required. This system provides a method of standardising osteoma surgical decisions.

Type
Main Articles
Copyright
Copyright © JLO (1984) Limited 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1Koivunen, P, Löppönen, H, Pfors, A, Jokinen, K. The growth rate of osteomas of the paranasal sinus. Clin Otolaryngol 1997;22:111–14CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2Earwalker, J. Paranasal sinus osteomas: a review of 46 cases. Skel Radiol 1993;22:417–23CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3Zouloumis, L, Lazaridis, N, Papadaki, M, Epivatianos, A. Osteoma of the ethmoid sinus: a rare case of recurrence. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2005;43:520–2CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
4Childrey, JH. Osteoma of sinuses, the frontal and sphenoid bone. Arch Otolaryngol 1939;30:6372CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5Mehta, BS, Grewal, GS. Osteoma of the paranasal sinus along with the case of an orbito-ethmoidal osteoma. J Laryngol Otol 1960;77:601–10CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6Bourgeois, P, Gichten, A, Louis, E, Vincent, C, Pertuzon, B, Assaker, R. Neuro-ophthalmological complications of frontal sinus osteomas [in French]. Neurochirurgie 2002;48:104–8Google ScholarPubMed
7Nabeshima, K, Marutsuka, K, Shimao, Y, Uehara, H, Kodama, T. Osteoma of the frontal sinus complicated by intracranial mucocele. Pathol Int 2003;53:227–30CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
8Dispenza, C, Saraniti, C, Ferrara, S, Martines, F, Caramanna, C, Salzano, FA. Frontal sinus osteoma and palpebral abscess: case report [in French]. Rev Laryngol Otol Rhinol (Bord) 2005;126:4951Google ScholarPubMed
9Namdar, I, Edelstein, DR, Huo, J, Lazar, A, Kimmelman, ChP, Soletic, R. Management of osteomas of the paranasal sinuses. Am J Rhinol 1998;12:393–8CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
10Karapantzos, I, Detorakis, ET, Drakonaki, EE, Ganasouli, DL, Danielides, V, Kozobolis, VP. Ethmoidal osteoma with intraorbital extension: excision through a transcutaneous paranasal incision. Acta Ophthalmol Scand 2005;83:392–4CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
11Onal, B, Kaymaz, M, Arac, M, Dogulu, F. Frontal sinus osteoma associated with pneumocephalus. Diagn Interv Radiol 2006;12:174–6Google ScholarPubMed
12Hartwidge, C, Varma, TR. Intracranial aeroceles as a complication of frontal sinus osteoma. Surg Neurol 1984;24:401–4CrossRefGoogle Scholar
13Huneidi, AH, Afshar, F. Chronic spontaneous tension pneumocephalus due to benign frontal osteoma. Br J Neurosurg 1989;3:389–92CrossRefGoogle Scholar
14Roca, B, Casado, O, Borras, JM, Gonzalez-Darder, JM. Frontal brain abscess due to Streptococcus pneumoniae associated with an osteoma. Int J Infect Dis 2004;8:193–4CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
15Panagiotopoulos, V, Tzortzidis, F, Partheni, M, Iliadis, H, Fratzoglou, M. Giant osteoma of the frontoethmoidal sinus associated with two cerebral abscesses. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2005;43:523–5CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
16Smith, ME, Calcaterra, TC. Frontal sinus osteoma. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 1989;98:896900CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
17Atallah, N, Jay, MM. Osteomas of the paranasal sinuses. J Laryngol Otol 1981;95:291304CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
18Savic, DLJ, Djeric, DR. Indications for the surgical treatment of osteomas of the frontal and ethmoid sinuses. Clin Otolaryngol 1990;15:397404CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
19Woldenberg, Y, Nash, M, Bodner, L. Peripheral osteoma of the maxillofacial region. Diagnosis and management: a study of 14 cases. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal 2005;10(suppl 2):139–42Google ScholarPubMed
20Izci, Y. Management of the large cranial osteoma: experience with 13 adult patients [in German]. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 2005;147:1151–5CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
21Klonowski, S, Klatka, J, Szymanski, M. Giant osteoma of the ethmoid sinus and frontal sinuses [in Polish]. Otolaryngol Pol 2005;59:899901Google ScholarPubMed
22Rodriguez Prado, N, Llorente Pendás, JL, Del Campo Rodriguez, A, Puente Verez, M, Suarez Nieto, C. Paranasal sinus osteomas. Revision of 14 cases [in Spanish]. Acta Otorrinolaringol Esp 2004;55:225–30CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
23Chiu, AG, Schipor, I, Cohen, NA, Kennedy, DW, Palmer, JN. Surgical decisions in the management of frontal sinus osteomas. Am J Rhinol 2005;9:191–7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
24Chen, C, Selva, D, Wormald, PJ. Endoscopic modified Lothrop procedure: an alternative for frontal osteoma excision. Rhinology 2004;42:239–43Google ScholarPubMed
25Dubin, MG, Kuhn, FA. Preservation of natural frontal sinus outflow in the management of frontal sinus osteomas. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2006;134:1824CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
26Spencer, MG, Mitchelli, DB. Growth of a frontal sinus osteoma. J Laryngol Otol 1987;101:726–8CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
27Gil-Carcedo, LM, Alarcos, E, Alarcos, A, Izquierdo, JM. Osteomas. Presentation of 26 cases. I. General characteristics. Clinical symptoms [in Spanish]. Anales ORL Iber Amer 1987;14:201–24Google Scholar
28Gil-Carcedo, LM, Izquierdo, JM, Alarcos, E, Alarcos, A. Osteomas. II. Differential diagnosis [in Spanish]. Anales ORL Iber Amer 1987;14:285300Google ScholarPubMed
29Gil-Carcedo, LM, Alarcos, E, Alarcos, A, Izquierdo, JM. Osteomas. III. Therapeutic indications. Treatment [in Spanish]. Anales ORL Iber Amer 1987;14:369–87Google Scholar
30Seiberling, K, Floreani, S, Robinson, S, Wormald, PJ. Endoscopic management of frontal sinus osteomas revisited. Am J Rhinol Allergy 2009;23:331–6CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
31Close, LG. Endoscopic Lothrop procedure: when should it be considered? Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2005;13:67–9CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed