Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T04:27:41.290Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Diagnostic delays in vestibular schwannoma

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 June 2008

H Teppo ,
J Heikkinen ,
K Laitakari  and
O-P Alho
H Teppo*
Affiliation:
Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Kanta-Häme Central Hospital, Hämeenlinna, Finland
J Heikkinen
Affiliation:
Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Oulu University Hospital, Finland
K Laitakari
Affiliation:
Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Oulu University Hospital, Finland
O-P Alho
Affiliation:
Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Oulu University Hospital, Finland
*
Address for correspondence: Dr Heikki Teppo, Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Kanta-Häme Central Hospital, FIN-13530 Hämeenlinna, Finland. Fax: +358 3 6292933 E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Objectives:

The literature on delays in vestibular schwannoma diagnosis is from the era before the routine use of magnetic resonance imaging. We evaluated such diagnostic delays and their impact on tumour size and on pre- and post-treatment morbidity, in a relatively recent patient series.

Study design:

Retrospective review.

Methods:

A two-centre study was conducted, including 91 consecutive vestibular schwannoma patients diagnosed between 1992 and 2006. Data on the presenting symptom and the initial medical visit were obtained from primary care records completed at the time of the initial visit; data on the tumour and the clinical course were obtained from review of the hospital chart. Data on diagnostic delays were available for 59 patients.

Results:

The median patient, professional and total diagnostic delays were three, four and 14 months, respectively. Unilateral hearing loss as the presenting symptom predicted an lengthened total diagnostic delay. Diagnostic delay had no impact on the tumour size at time of diagnosis or on the pre- and post-treatment morbidity.

Conclusions:

Delays in the diagnosis of vestibular schwannoma have shortened since the introduction of magnetic resonance imaging. Longer diagnostic delays do not seem to have significant consequences.

Keywords

Acoustic NeuromaMagnetic Resonance ImagingDiagnosis
Type
Main Articles
Information
The Journal of Laryngology & Otology , Volume 123 , Issue 3 , March 2009 , pp. 289 - 293
Copyright
Copyright © JLO (1984) Limited 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Thomsen, J, Tos, M. Acoustic neuromas. Diagnostic delay, growth rate and possible non-surgical treatment. Acta Otolaryngol 1988;452:26–33CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
2 Thomsen, J, Tos, M. Acoustic neuroma: clinical aspects, audiovestibular assessment, diagnostic delay, and growth rate. Am J Otol 1990;11:12–19Google ScholarPubMed
3 van Leeuwen, J, Harhangi, B, Thewissen, N, Thijssen, H, Cremers, C. Delays in the diagnosis of acoustic neuromas. Am J Otol 1996;17:321–5Google ScholarPubMed
4 Traquina, D, Gutenberg, I, Sasaki, C. Delayed diagnosis and treatment of acoustic neuroma. Laryngoscope 1989;99:814–18Google Scholar
5 Barr, D, Brackmann, D, Olson, J, House, W. Changing concepts of acoustic neuroma diagnosis. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1985;111:17–21CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6 Sidman, J, Carrasco, V, Whaley, P, Pillsbury, H. Gadolinium – the new gold standard for diagnosing cerebellopontine tumors. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1989;115:1244–7Google Scholar
7 Welling, D, Glasscock, M, Jackson, C. Acoustic neuroma: a cost-effective approach. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1990;103:364–70Google Scholar
8 Robson, A, Leighton, S, Anslow, P, Milford, C. MRI as a single screening procedure for acoustic neuroma: a cost effective procedure. J R Soc Med 1993;86:455–7Google Scholar
9 Hackett, T, Cassem, N, Raker, J. Patient delay in cancer. N Eng J Med 1973;289:14–20Google Scholar
10 Flood, L, Brammer, R, Graham, M, Kemink, J. Pitfalls in the diagnosis of acoustic neuroma. Clin Otolaryngol 1984;9:165–70CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
11 Stangerup, S, Cave-Thomasen, P, Tos, M, Thomsen, J. The natural history of vestibular schwannoma. Otol Neurol 2006;27:547–52Google Scholar
12 Anand, V, Kerr, A, Byrnes, D, Smyth, G. Non-surgical management of acoustic neuromas. Clin Otolaryngol 1992;17:406–10Google Scholar
13 Raut, V, Walsh, R, Bath, A, Bance, M, Guha, A, Tator, C et al. Conservative management of vestibular schwannomas – second review of a prospective longitudinal study. Clin Otolaryngol 2004;29:505–14CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed