Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-8ctnn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-24T13:22:20.720Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A comparison of packing materials used in nasal surgery

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 June 2007

R. J. N. Garth  and
A. P. Brightwell
R. J. N. Garth*
Affiliation:
Department of Otolaryngology, Royal Devon and Exeter Hospital, Exeter, Devon.
A. P. Brightwell
Affiliation:
Department of Otolaryngology, Royal Devon and Exeter Hospital, Exeter, Devon.
*
R. J. N. Garth, F.R.C.S.,ENT Department, Royal Naval Hospital, Haslar, Gosport, Hampshire PO12 2AA.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

A prospective study was performed to compare Telfa,® paraffin gauze, Merocel® and BIPP used postoperatively following septal or turbinate surgery. Packs were assessed in terms of patient comfort, control of bleeding and ease of removal. There was little to choose between the packs while they were in situ and there was no significant difference in ease of removal. On removal the Telfa® and paraffin gauze were associated with less discomfort and less bleeding than BIPP or Merocel® (p<0.05).

Keywords

NosesurgeryOcclusive dressingsTampons
Type
Main Articles
Information
The Journal of Laryngology & Otology , Volume 108 , Issue 7 , July 1994 , pp. 564 - 566
Copyright
Copyright © JLO (1984) Limited 1994

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Cvetnic, Z., Cvetnic, S., Rocic, B. (1976) Disordered gas exchange in the blood caused by nasal tamponade. Rhinology 14: 121–127.Google Scholar
de Vries, N., van der Baan, S. (1989) Toxic shock syndrome after nasal surgery: is prevention possible? Rhinology 27: 125–128.Google ScholarPubMed
Fairbanks, D. N. F. (1986) Complications of nasal packing. Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery 94: 412–415.Google Scholar
Illum, P., Grymer, L., Hilberg, O. (1992) Nasal packing after septoplasty. Clinical Otolaryngology 17: 158–162.Google Scholar
Leek, J. H. (1985) Combined Merocel and Gel-film as a nasal pack. Laryngoscope 95: 99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nunez, D. A., Martin, F. W. (1991) An evaluation of post-operative packing in nasal septal surgery. Clinical Otolaryngology 16: 549–550.Google Scholar
Samad, I., Stevens, H. E., Maloney, A. (1992) The efficacy of nasal septal surgery. Journal of Otolaryngology (Toronto) 21: 88–91.Google ScholarPubMed
Watson, M. G., Campbell, J. B., Shenoi, P. M. (1989) Nasal surgery: does the pack influence the results? Rhinology 27: 105–111.Google Scholar