Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-q99xh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-24T02:25:32.507Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Comparative study of orbital involvement in invasive and non-invasive fungal sinusitis

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 December 2011

R Chandrasekharan ,
M Thomas  and
V Rupa
R Chandrasekharan
Affiliation:
Department of ENT, Christian Medical College, Vellore, India
M Thomas
Affiliation:
Department of General Pathology, Christian Medical College, Vellore, India
V Rupa*
Affiliation:
Department of ENT, Christian Medical College, Vellore, India
*
Address for correspondence: Dr V Rupa, Department of ENT, Unit 3, Christian Medical College Hospital, Vellore – 632004, Tamil Nadu, India Fax: 91 (0)416 2232035 E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Objective:

To investigate differences in orbital involvement in patients with invasive versus non-invasive fungal sinusitis.

Method:

One hundred consecutive cases of fungal sinusitis were assessed clinically and by computed tomography scan to evaluate orbital involvement.

Results:

Clinical orbital involvement was more common in invasive (73.5 per cent) than non-invasive (12.1 per cent) fungal sinusitis (p = 0.000). Computed tomography scanning showed similar orbital involvement in both groups, except for erosion of the floor of the orbit, which was more common in patients with invasive fungal sinusitis (p = 0.01). Extra-ocular muscle enlargement (44.4 vs 4 per cent, p = 0.01) and optic atrophy (44.4 vs 0 per cent, p = 0.003) were more common in chronic than acute invasive fungal sinusitis. Four patients (16 per cent) with acute invasive fungal sinusitis had no evidence of orbital involvement on scanning, despite clinical evidence of optic atrophy.

Conclusion:

Orbital involvement is more common in invasive than non-invasive fungal sinusitis. The difference is more evident clinically than on computed tomography scanning. Patients with acute invasive fungal sinusitis may have limited evidence of orbital involvement on scanning, despite extensive clinical disease.

Keywords

OrbitParanasal SinusesMycosesSinusitisNatural HistoryPathology
Type
Main Articles
Information
The Journal of Laryngology & Otology , Volume 126 , Issue 2 , February 2012 , pp. 152 - 158
Copyright
Copyright © JLO (1984) Limited 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1Dunlop, IS, Billson, FA. Visual failure in allergic aspergillus sinusitis: case report. Br J Ophthalmol 1988;72:127–30CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
2Marple, BF, Gibbs, SR, Newcomer, MT, Mabry, RL. Allergic fungal sinusitis-induced visual loss. Am J Rhinol 1999;13:191–5CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
3Meyer, DR, Nagi, K. Allergic fungal sinusitis with subperiosteal orbital abscess. Arch Ophthalmol 2005;123:1281–2CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
4Rupa, V, Jacob, M, Mathews, MS, Kurian, M, Job, A, Chandi, SM. Clinicopathological and mycological spectrum of allergic fungal sinusitis in South India. Mycoses 2002;45:364–7CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
5Manning, SC, Merkel, M, Kriesel, K, Vuitch, F, Marple, B. Computed tomography and magnetic resonance diagnosis of allergic fungal sinusitis. Laryngoscope 1997;107:170–6CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
6Mukherji, SK, Figueroa, RE, Ginsberg, LE, Zeifer, BA, Marple, BF, Alley, JG et al. Allergic fungal sinusitis - CT findings. Radiology 1998;207:417–22CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
7Ghegan, MD, Lee, FS, Schlosser, RJ. Incidence of skull base and orbital erosion in allergic fungal rhinosinusitis (AFRS) and non-AFRS. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2006;134:592–5CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
8Nussenbaum, B, Marple, BF, Schwade, ND. Characteristics of bony erosion in allergic fungal rhinosinusitis. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2001;124:150–4CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
9Ferguson, BJ. Fungus balls of the paranasal sinuses. Otolaryngol Clin North Am. 2000;33:389–98CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
10Klossek, JM, Serrano, E, Peloquin, L, Percodani, J, Fontanel, JP, Pessey, JJ. Functional endoscopic sinus surgery and 109 cases of mycetomas of paranasal sinuses. Laryngoscope 1997;107:112–17CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
11Bhansali, A, Bhadada, S, Sharma, A, Suresh, V, Gupta, A, Singh, P et al. Presentation and outcome of rhino-orbital-cerebral mucormycosis in patients with diabetes. Postgrad Med J 2004;80:670–4CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
12Panda, NK, Balaji, P, Chakrabarti, A, Sharma, SC, Reddy, CE. Paranasal sinus aspergillosis: its categorization to develop a treatment protocol. Mycoses 2004;47:277–83CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
13Nithyanandam, S, Jacob, MS, Battu, RR, Thomas, RK, Correa, MA, D'Souza, O. Rhino-orbito-cerebral mucormycosis. A retrospective analysis of clinical features and treatment outcomes. Indian J Ophthalmol 2003;51:231–6Google ScholarPubMed
14Thiagalingam, S, Fernando, GT, Tan, K, O'Donnell, BA, Weeks, K, Branley, M. Orbital apex syndrome secondary to Pseudallescheria boydii fungal sinusitis in an immunocompetent patient. Clin Experiment Ophthalmol 2004;32:545–7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
15Ferry, AP, Abedi, S. Diagnosis and management of rhino-orbito-cerebral mucormycosis. A report of 16 personally observed cases. Ophthalmology 1983;90:1096–104CrossRefGoogle Scholar
16Yohai, RA, Bullock, JD, Aziz, AA, Markert, RJ. Survival factors in rhino-orbito-cerebral mucormycosis. Surv Ophthalmol 1994;39:3–22CrossRefGoogle Scholar
17Park, AH, Muntz, HR, Smith, ME, Afify, Z, Pysher, T, Pavia, A. Pediatric invasive fungal rhinosinusitis in immunocompromised children with cancer. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2005;133:411–16CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
18Dhiwakar, M, Thakar, A, Bahadur, S. Invasive sino-orbital aspergillosis: surgical decisions and dilemmas. J Laryngol Otol 2003;117:280–5CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
19Veress, B, Malik, OA, el-Tayeb, AA, el-Daoud, S, Mahgoub, ES, el-Hassan, AM. Further observations on the primary paranasal aspergillus granuloma in the Sudan. Am J Trop Med Hyg 1973;22:765–72CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
20Aribandi, M, McCoy, VA, Bazan, C 3rd. Imaging features of invasive and non invasive fungal sinusitis – a review. Radiographics 2007;27:1283–96CrossRefGoogle Scholar
21deShazo, RD, O Brien, M, Chapin, K, Soto-Aquilar, M, Gardner, L, Swain, R. A new classification and diagnostic criteria for invasive fungal sinusitis. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1997;123:1181–8CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
22Rupa, V, Jacob, M, Mathews, MS. Increasing diagnostic yield in allergic fungal sinusitis. J Laryngol Otol 2001;115:636–8CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
23DelGaudio, JM, Swain, RE Jr, Kingdom, TT, Muller, S, Hudgins, PA. Computed tomographic findings in patients with invasive fungal sinusitis. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2003;129:236–40CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed