Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-m6dg7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-20T01:09:05.691Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Clinical role of informal tests of hearing

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 June 2007

G. G. Browning ,
I. R. C. Swan  and
K. K. Chew
G. G. Browning*
Affiliation:
Glasgow
I. R. C. Swan
Affiliation:
Glasgow
K. K. Chew
Affiliation:
Glasgow
*
G. G. Browning, University Department of Otolaryngology, Royal Infirmary, Glasgow G4 0SF.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Clinical tests of hearing are regularly used in adults but their role, now that pure-tone audiometry is almost universally available, has not been evaluated by modern methods of analysis including sensitivity and specificity.

Free-field voice testing was carried out in 101 patients and the Rinne tuning-fork test in a different group of 127 patients prior to clinical or audiometric evaluation. The results were subsequently compared to air and bone conduction pure-tone thresholds assessed using rigorous standards.

Depending on the audiometric definition as to what constitutes a hearing impairment, the sensitivity of free-field voice testing to identify such an impairment because of an inability to hear a whispered voice at two feet (60 cm.) was 86 per cent or better with the specificity being in the region of 90 per cent.

In the Rinne test the 256 Hz fork was superior to the 512 Hz fork (p<0.05) and the loudness comparison method superior to the threshold decay method (p<0.01) in detecting an air-bone gap. Combining the responses to the two forks did not improve the results. The Rinne test with the 256 Hz fork will identify correctly 48 per cent of individuals with a 15 dB, 69 per cent with a 20 dB, 87 per cent with a 25 dB, and 95 per cent with a 30 dB conductive impairment. In all instances the specificity is greater than 90 per cent.

Type
Main Articles
Information
The Journal of Laryngology & Otology , Volume 103 , Issue 1 , January 1989 , pp. 7 - 11
Copyright
Copyright © JLO (1984) Limited 1989

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

British Society of Audiology (1981). Recommended procedures for pure tone audiometry. British Journal of Audiology, 15, 213–216.Google Scholar
Capper, J. W. R., Slack, R. W. T. and Maw, A. R. (1987). Tuning fork tests in children (An evaluation of their usefulness). Journal of Laryngology and Otology, 101: 780–783.Google Scholar
Coles, R. R. A. and Preide, V. M. (1970). On the misdiagnosis resulting from the incorrect use of masking. Journal of Laryngology and Otology, 84: 41–63.Google Scholar
Crowley, H. and Kaufman, R. S. (1966). The Rinne tuning fork test. Archives of Otolaryngology, 81: 406–508.Google Scholar
Doyle, P. J., Anderson, D. W. and Pijl, S. (1984). The tuning fork—an essential instrument in otologic practice. Journal of Otolaryngology, 13: 83–86.Google Scholar
Fowler, E. P. (1937). Discovery and evaluation of otic cripples. Archives of Otolaryngology, 45: 550–561.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gelfand, S. A. (1977). Clinical precision of the Rinne test. Acta Otolaryngologica, 83: 480–487.Google Scholar
Golabek, W. and Stephens, S. D. G. (1979). Some tuning fork tests revisited. Clinical Otolaryngology, 4: 421–430.Google Scholar
Hinchcliffe, R. (1981). Clinical tests of auditory function in the adult and the schoolchild. In Audiology and Audiological Medicine, Ed. Beagley, H. A. Vol. 1 Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hinchcliffe, R. and Littler, T. S. (1961). The detection and measurement of conductive deafness. Journal of Laryngology and Otology, 75: 201–215.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stankiewicz, J. A. and Mowry, H. J. (1979). Clinical accuracy of tuning fork tests. Laryngoscope, 80: 1956–1963.Google Scholar
Swan, I. R. C. (1984). Clinical aspects of hearing-aid provision. MD thesis. University of Glasgow, Scotland.Google Scholar
Trowbridge, B. C. (1947). Correlations of hearing tests. Archives of Otolaryngology, 45: 319–334.Google Scholar
Wilson, W. R. and Woods, L. A. (1975). Accuracy of the Bing and Rinne tuning fork tests. Archives of Otolaryngology, 101: 81–85.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed