Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-fscjk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T09:03:56.916Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Can smartphone vibration provide a valid alternative to tuning forks for use on the ENT ward round?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 April 2019

M E Hopkins  and
D Owens
M E Hopkins*
Affiliation:
Department of ENT Surgery, University Hospital of Wales, Cardiff, UK
D Owens
Affiliation:
Department of ENT Surgery, University Hospital of Wales, Cardiff, UK
*
Author for correspondence: Mr Michael E Hopkins, ENT Department, Lauriston Place, Edinburgh EH3 9EN E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Background

All patients undergoing tympanomastoid surgery should be assessed post-operatively for a ‘dead ear’; however, tuning forks are frequently inaccessible.

Objective

To demonstrate that smartphone-based vibration applications provide equivalent accuracy to tuning forks when performing Weber's test.

Methods

Data were collected on lay participants with no underlying hearing loss. Earplugs were used to simulate conductive hearing loss. Both the right and left ears were tested with the iBrateMe vibration application on an iPhone and using a 512 Hz tuning fork.

Results

Occluding the left ear, the tuning fork lateralised to the left in 18 out of 20 cases. In 20 out of 20 cases, sound lateralised to the left with the iPhone (chi-square test, p = 0.147). Occluding the right ear, the tuning fork lateralised to the right in 19 out of 20 cases. In 19 out of 20 cases, sound lateralised to the right with the iPhone (chi-square test, p > 0.999).

Conclusion

Smartphone-based vibration applications represent a viable, more accessible alternative to tuning forks when assessing for conductive hearing loss. They can therefore be utilised on the ward round, in patients following tympanomastoid surgery, for example.

Keywords

Hearing LossSmartphoneHearing TestsOtologyMastoidSurgery
Type
Short Communications
Information
The Journal of Laryngology & Otology , Volume 133 , Issue 3 , March 2019 , pp. 245 - 247
Copyright
Copyright © JLO (1984) Limited, 2019 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

Mr M E Hopkins takes responsibility for the integrity of the content of the paper

Presented as a poster at the British Association of Otorhinolaryngology (‘BACO’) meeting, 4–6 July 2018, Manchester, UK.

References

1Buckland, JR, Geyer, M, Maleki, N, Mitchell, TM. The use of Weber tuning fork test and ‘scratch test’ in postoperative tympanomastoid surgery. Clin Otolaryngol 2006;31:581Google Scholar
2Iacovidou, A, Giblett, N, Doshi, J, Jindal, M. How reliable is the “scratch test” versus the Weber test after tympanomastoid surgery? Otol Neurotol 2014;35:762–3Google Scholar
3Miltenburg, D. The validity of tuning fork tests in diagnosing hearing loss. J Otolaryngol 1994;23:254–9Google Scholar
4Stankiewicz, JA, Mowry, HJ. Clinical accuracy of tuning fork tests. Laryngoscope 1979;89:1956–63Google Scholar