Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-7cvxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T17:36:30.140Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Bonebridge transcutaneous bone conduction implant in children with congenital aural atresia: surgical and audiological outcomes

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 July 2018

L X Ngui  and
I P Tang
L X Ngui
Affiliation:
Department of Otorhinolaryngology – Head and Neck Surgery, Sarawak General Hospital, Malaysia
I P Tang*
Affiliation:
Department of Otorhinolaryngology – Head and Neck Surgery, Sarawak General Hospital, Malaysia Department of Otorhinolaryngology – Head and Neck Surgery, Universiti Malaysia Sarawak, Malaysia
*
Author for correspondence: Dr Ing Ping Tang, Department of Otorhinolaryngology – Head and Neck Surgery, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Universiti Malaysia Sarawak, Jalan Datuk Mohd Musa, 94300 Kota Samarahan, Sarawak, Malaysia E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Objectives

To investigate the surgical and audiological outcomes of the Bonebridge transcutaneous bone conduction hearing implant among children with congenital aural atresia.

Methods

Six children were recruited and underwent Bonebridge transcutaneous bone conduction implant surgery. The patients’ audiometric thresholds for air conduction, bone conduction and sound-field tests were assessed pre-operatively and at six months post-operatively. Patients’ satisfaction was assessed at six months post-operatively with the Hearing Device Satisfaction Scale.

Results

No major complications were reported. Mean aided sound-field thresholds improved post-operatively by more than 30 dB for 0.5–4 kHz (p < 0.05). Mean unaided air conduction and bone conduction thresholds differed by less than 5 dB post-operatively (compared to pre-operatively) for 0.5–4 kHz; these findings were not significant (p > 0.05). All patients were satisfied (scores were over 90 per cent) with the implant in terms of functional outcome and cosmetic appearance.

Conclusion

Bonebridge transcutaneous bone conduction implant surgery is safe and effective among children with congenital aural atresia with conductive hearing loss.

Keywords

Bone ConductionHearing AidsCorrection Of Hearing ImpairmentTreatment Outcome
Type
Main Articles
Information
The Journal of Laryngology & Otology , Volume 132 , Issue 8 , August 2018 , pp. 693 - 697
Copyright
Copyright © JLO (1984) Limited, 2018 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

Dr I P Tang takes responsibility for the integrity of the content of the paper

References

1Chandrasekhar, SS, De La Cruz, A. Surgery of congenital aural atresia. Am J Otol 1995;16:713–17Google Scholar
2De la Cruz, A, Teufert, KB. Congenital aural atresia surgery: long-term results. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2003;129:121–7Google Scholar
3Schuknecht, HF. Congenital aural atresia. Laryngoscope 1989;99:908–17Google Scholar
4Jovankovičová, A, Staník, R, Kunzo, S, Majáková, L, Profant, M. Surgery or implantable hearing devices in children with congenital aural atresia: 25 years of our experience. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 2015;79:975–9Google Scholar
5Jahrsdoerfer, RA, Yeakley, JW, Aguilar, EA, Cole, RR, Gray, LC. Grading system for the selection of patients with congenital aural atresia. Am J Otol 1992;13:6–12Google Scholar
6Evans, AK, Kazahaya, K. Canal atresia: “surgery or implantable hearing devices? The expert's question is revisited”. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 2007;71:367–74Google Scholar
7Verhagen, CV, Hol, MK, Coppens-Shellekens, W, Snik, AF, Cremers, CW. The Baha Softband, a new treatment for young children with bilateral congenital aural atresia. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 2008;72:1455–9Google Scholar
8Yu, JK, Wong, LL, Tsang, WS, Tong, MC. A tutorial on implantable hearing amplification options for adults with unilateral microtia and atresia. Biomed Res Int 2014;2014:703256Google Scholar
9Kiringoda, R, Lustig, LR. A meta-analysis of the complications associated with osseointegrated hearing aids. Otol Neurotol 2013;34:790–4Google Scholar
10Baumgartner, WD, Hamzavi, JS, Böheim, K, Wolf-Magele, A, Schlögel, M, Riechelmann, H et al. A new transcutaneous bone conduction hearing implant: short-term safety and efficacy in children. Otol Neurotol 2016;37:713–20Google Scholar
11Kraai, T, Brown, C, Neeff, M, Fisher, K. Complications of bone-anchored hearing aids in pediatric patients. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 2011;75:749–53Google Scholar
12Siau, RT, Dhillon, B, Siau, D, Green, KM. Bone-anchored hearing aids in conductive and mixed hearing losses: why do patients reject them? Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2016;273:3117–22Google Scholar
13Célérier, C, Thierry, B, Coudert, C, Blanchard, M, Loundon, N, Garabédian, EN et al. Results of VSB implantation at the short process of the incus in children with ear atresia. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 2017;93:83–7Google Scholar
14Riss, D, Arnoldner, C, Baumgartner, WD, Blineder, M, Flak, S, Bachner, A et al. Indication criteria and outcomes with the Bonebridge transcutaneous bone-conduction implant. Laryngoscope 2014;124:2802–6Google Scholar
15Sprinzl, GM, Wolf-Magele, A. The Bonebridge bone conduction hearing implant: indication criteria, surgery and a systematic review. Clin Otolaryngol 2016;41:131–43Google Scholar
16Tang, IP, Devesahayam, PR, Narayanan, P. The Surgical Manual of Common Otological Implants. New Delhi: Jaypee Brothers, 2015;40–8Google Scholar
17Zernotti, ME, Sarasty, AB. Active bone conduction prosthesis: Bonebridge(TM). Int Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2015;19:343–8Google Scholar
18Lassaletta, L, Calvino, M, Zernotti, M, Gavilán, J. Postoperative pain in patients undergoing a transcutaneous active bone conduction implant (Bonebridge). Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2016;273:4103–10Google Scholar
19Rahne, T, Seiwerth, I, Götze, G, Heider, C, Radetzki, F, Herzog, M et al. Functional results after Bonebridge implantation in adults and children with conductive and mixed hearing loss. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2015;272:3263–9Google Scholar
20Stuart, A, Stenstrom, R, Tompkins, C, Vandenhoff, S. Test-retest variability in audiometric threshold with supraaural and insert earphones among children and adults. Audiology 1991;30:82–90Google Scholar