Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2plfb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T18:23:38.586Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Birmingham bone anchored hearing aid programme: paediatric experience and results

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 June 2007

R. H. Powell ,
S. P. Burrell ,
H. R. Cooper  and
D. W. Proops
R. H. Powell
Affiliation:
Department of Audiology, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, University Hospital Birmingham NHS Trust, Birmingham, UK.
S. P. Burrell
Affiliation:
Department of Audiology, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, University Hospital Birmingham NHS Trust, Birmingham, UK.
H. R. Cooper
Affiliation:
Department of Audiology, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, University Hospital Birmingham NHS Trust, Birmingham, UK.
D. W. Proops
Affiliation:
Department of Otolaryngology, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, University Hospital Birmingham NHS Trust, Birmingham, UK.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Over a five-year period, 34 patients have been referred to the Birmingham bone anchored hearing aid programme, paediatric section, of whom 21 are now wearing the bone anchored hearing aid (BAHA) and four are awaiting surgery for fitting of the BAHA. Of the patients assessed, found to be suitable and who proceeded to surgery for the BAHA, 44 per cent had Treacher Collins syndrome, 28 per cent had bilateral atresia or microtia, 16 per cent had Goldenhaar's syndrome, four per cent (one patient) had branchio-oto-renal syndrome and eight per cent had chronic suppurative otitis media. This paper presents objective and subjective data collected from these patients. It is shown that the BAHA is a very effective hearing aid for children with congenital hearing loss.

Keywords

Hearing aids, bone anchoredHearing loss, conductive, congenitalChild
Type
Research Article
Information
The Journal of Laryngology & Otology , Volume 110 , Supplement 21 , December 1996 , pp. 21 - 29
Copyright
Copyright © JLO (1984) Limited 1996

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Cremers, C. W. R. J., Snik, A. F. M., Beynon, A. J. (1992) Hearing with the bone anchored hearing (BAHA HC200) compared to a conventional bone conduction hearing aid. Clinical Otolaryngology 17: 275–279.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hakansson, B., Liden, B., Tjëllström, A. (1990) Ten years experience with the Swedish bone anchored hearing aid system. Annals of Otology, Rhinology and Laryngology 99 (Suppl 151): 1–16.Google Scholar
Hakansson, B., Tjëllström, A., Rosenhall, U., Carlsson, P. (1985) The bone anchored hearing aid principal design and a psychoacoustical evaluation. Acta Otolaryngologica 100: 229–239.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mylanus, E. A. M., Snik, A. F. M., Cremers, C. W. R. J. (1995) Patients' opinions of bone anchored vs conventional hearing aids. Archives of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery 121: 421–425.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Snik, A. F. M., Mylanus, E. A. M., Cremers, C. W. R. J. (1994) Speech recognition with the bone anchored hearing aid determined objectively and subjectively. Ear, Nose and Throat Journal 73: 115–117.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stevenson, D. S., Proops, D. W., Wake, M. J. C., Deadman, M. J., Worrollo, S., Hobson, J. A. (1993) Osseointegrated implants in the management of childhood ear abnormalities: The Birmingham experience. Journal of Laryngology and Otology 107: 502–509.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tjëllström, A., Ganstrom, G. (1994) Long-term follow-up with the bone anchored hearing aid: A review of the first 100 patients between 1977 and 1985. Ear, Nose and Throat Journal 73: 112–114.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed