Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-vdxz6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T12:20:19.148Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

An apparatus to measure pressure, flow and speech parameters in patients producing speech using the Groningen valve prosthesis

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 June 2007

A. J. Parker ,
J. C. Stevens  and
R. T. Clegg
A. J. Parker*
Affiliation:
Department of Otolaryngology/Head and Neck Surgery, The Royal Hallamshire Hospital, Sheffield S10 2JF
J. C. Stevens
Affiliation:
Department Medical Physics, The Royal Hallamshire Hospital, Sheffield S10 2JF
R. T. Clegg
Affiliation:
Department of Otolaryngology/Head and Neck Surgery, The Royal Hallamshire Hospital, Sheffield S10 2JF
*
Mr A. J. Parker, Ch.M., F.R.C.S., Senior Lecturer, Department of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Royal Hallamshire Hospital, Glossop Road, Sheffield S10 2JF
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

We present a validated method of determining in vivo pressure, flow and voice parameters from patients using tracheo-oesophageal voice prostheses post laryngectomy.

This apparatus was constructed simply using equipment which should be available in most large Otolaryngology Departments. There was good agreement between measurements made over two separate sessions of in vivo opening pressure, maximum flow through the device and maximum voice amplitude and these were significant. These measurements may be useful in monitoring patient progress and also in elucidating the mechanics of prosthesis failure.

Keywords

Voice prosthesisAirway resistancemeasurement
Type
Main Articles
Information
The Journal of Laryngology & Otology , Volume 106 , Issue 10 , October 1992 , pp. 896 - 899
Copyright
Copyright © JLO (1984) Limited 1992

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Blom, E. D., Singer, M. J. (1979) Surgical prosthetic approaches for post-laryngectomy rehabilitation. In Laryngectomee Rehabilitation.(Keith, R. L., ed) College Hill Press: Houston.Google Scholar
Mahieu, H. F.Van Saene, H. K. F., Rosingh, H. J., Schutte, H. K. (1986) Candida vegetations on silicone voice prostheses. Archives of Otolaryngology, 112: 321–325.Google Scholar
Moon, J. B., Weinberg, B. (1987) Aerodynamic and myoelastic contributions to tracheoesophageal voice production. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 30: 387–395.Google Scholar
Nijdam, H. F.Annyas, A. A., Schutte, H. K., Leever, H. (1982) A new prosthesis for voice rehabilitation after laryngectomy. Archives of Otorhinolaryngology, 237: 27–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parker, A. J., O'Leary, I. K., Wight, R. G., Clegg, R. T. (1991) The Groningen valve voice prosthesis in Sheffield: A four year review. Journal of Laryngology and Otology, 106: 154–156.Google Scholar
Staffieri, M. (1980) New surgical approaches for speech rehabilitation after total laryngectomy. In: Surgical and prosthetic approaches to speech rehabilitation, (Shedd, D. P., Weinberg, B., eds) G. K. Hall & Co.: Boston, p. 77–117.Google Scholar
Weinberg, B. (1982) Airway resistance of the voice button. Archives of Otolaryngology, 108: 498–500.Google Scholar
Weinberg, B., Horii, Y., Blom, E., Singer, M. (1982) Airway resistance during oesophageal phonation. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 47: 194–199.Google Scholar
Weinberg, B., Moon, J. (1986) Impact of tracheosophageal puncture prosthesis airway resistance on in vivo phonatory performance. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 51: 88–91.Google Scholar