Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-dh8gc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T10:20:55.833Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

12 Tinnitus as Suffering

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 November 2023

Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Other
Copyright
Copyright © JLO (1984) Limited 1986

References

[1] Tinnitus defies simple comparison with ordinary medical conditions but the analogy with pain from Dr Coles is apt.

[2] Not necessarily men, nor necessarily bright. Not even necessary in civil cases as the judge can also serve as a notional jury. British judges tend to specialise and are more astute than juries.

[3] More judicial attention might enhance the quantum of damages. Very severe tinnitus and hearing loss were awarded £7,000 and £12,000 in separate 1982 cases. Add the Lord Chancellor's annual adjustment for inflation. There is no precedent for adding £7,000 to £12,000 where a claimant suffers from both but it is certainly worth pleading separately. Compensation tends to be higher in non-industrial situations. Tinnitus was settled for £75,000 where a Hollywood actress had a pistol let off near her head in a Thames TV studio. She claimed, supported by 3 Beverley Hills psychiatrists, that her career was in ruins. The Medical Defence Union settled a case for £70,000. The civilian doctor allowed a young soldier to go back to firing a loud weapon after he had complained of tinnitus and hearing dullness initially. No audiogram was done’