No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
The Portuguese stakeholders’ perspective on social investment and quality assessment in LTC
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 09 March 2020
Abstract
There has been quite a considerable amount of debate over the last decade about the importance of quality assessment in the field of LTC provision in Portugal, framed by the discourse on social investment. In a context of limited resources, care providers are pressured to demonstrate creation of value. Quality assessment becomes one of the paths to demonstrate worthiness. This, however, has not translated into standardised protocols of evaluation of impacts and quality in particular. The question has been asked why is that? In this article we contribute to answering this question by looking at the discourses of stakeholders on the topic of social investment and quality in LTC. Overall there is a discourse that acknowledges the importance of assessing investments and quality as a reliable proxy to measure return on investments, although there is a general difficulty in translating social investment and the quest for quality into specific examples and tools.
- Type
- Article
- Information
- Journal of International and Comparative Social Policy , Volume 34 , Issue 2 , June 2018 , pp. 140 - 150
- Copyright
- Copyright © 2018 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group
References
Birren, J. E., Lubben, J. E., Rowe, J. C., & Deutchman, D. E. (Eds.). (2014). The concept and measurement of quality of life in the frail elderly. San Diego and London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Bowling, A., Banister, D., Sutton, S., Evans, O., & Windsor, J. (2002). A multidimensional model of the quality of life in older age. Aging and Mental Health, 6(4), 355–371.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bravo, G., De Wals, P., Dubois, M. F., & Charpentier, M. (1999). Correlates of care quality in long-term care facilities: A multilevel analysis. Journal of Gerontology, 54B(3), P180–P188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dahl, H. M. (2012). Who can be against quality? A new story about home-based care: NPM and governmentality. In Ceci, C., Bjørnsdottir, K., & Purkis, M. (Eds.), Perspectives on care at home for older peope (pp. 139–156). Oxon: Routledge.Google Scholar
Donabedian, A. (1988). The quality of care: How can it be assessed? JAMA, 260(12), 1743–1748.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
EU. (2012). Long-term care for the elderly. Provisions and providers in 33 European countries. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union.Google Scholar
Ferreira, V. (2010). Elderly care in Europe. Provisions and providers in Portugal. External report commissioned by and presented to the EU Directorate-General Employment and Social Affairs, Unit G1 ‘Equality between women and men’.Google Scholar
Kane, R. A., & Kane, R. L. (1988). Long-term care: Variations on a quality assurance theme. Inquiry, 25, 132–146.Google ScholarPubMed
Lopes, A. (2013). New approaches to familism in the management of social policy for old age in Portugal. In von Kondratowitz, H. J. & Troisi, J. (Eds.), Ageing in the Mediterranean (pp. 251–234). Bristol: Policy Press.Google Scholar
Lopes, A. (2017). LTC in Portugal: Quasi-privatization of a dual system of care. In Breve, B. (Ed.), Long-term care for the Eldferly in Europe (pp. 59–74). Oxford: Ashgate.Google Scholar
Lopes, A., Glanz, A., Richards, A., Greve, B., Barbieri, D., Micharikopoulos, D., … Rutkowska, Z. (2017). Conceptual report on long-term care. Deliverable D.2.1 SPRINT – social protection innovative investment in long-term care. London and Brussels: SPRINT Consortium. Retrieved from http://sprint-project.eu/wp-content/uploads/2015/12/SPRINT_D.2.1_Conceptual_Report_LTC.pdfGoogle Scholar
Midgley, J., Dahl, E., & Wright, A. (Eds.). (2017). Social investment and social welfare. International and critical perspectives. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mor, V. (2005). Improving the quality of long-term care with better information. The Milbank Quarterly, 83(3), 333–364.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mor, V., Angelelli, J., Gifford, D., Morris, J., & Moore, T. (2003). Benchmarking and quality in residential and nursing homes: Lessons from the US. International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry, 18(3), 258–266.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Morel, N., Palier, B., & Palme, J. (Eds.). (2012). Towards a social investment welfare state. Ideas, policies and challenges. Bristol: Policy Press.Google Scholar
Paúl, C., & Fonseca, A. (Eds.). (2005). Envelhecer em Portugal, Psicologia, Saúde e Prestação de Cuidados. Lisbon: Climepsi.Google Scholar
Pereirinha, J., & Murteira, M. (2016). The Portugese welfare system in a time of crisis and fiscal austerity. In Schubert, K. (Ed.), Challenges to European welfare systems (pp. 587–614). Heidelberg: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Petmesidou, M. (2018). Southern Europe. In Greve, B. (Ed.), The Routledge handbook of the welfare state (2nd ed, pp. 183–192). Oxon: Routledge.Google Scholar
Rhodes, M. (Eds.). (1997). Southern European welfare states. Between crisis and reform. London: Frank Cass.Google Scholar
Saraceno, C. (2017). Southern European welfare regimes: From differentiation to reconvergence? In Kennet, P., & Lendvai-Baiton, N. (Eds.), Handbook of European social policy (pp. 218–229). Chelthenham: Edward Elgar.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vaarama, M., Pieper, R., & Sixsmith, A. (Eds.). (2007). Care-related quality of life in old age. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
Yin, R. (2014). Case study research: Design and methods (5th ed.). Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar