Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-vdxz6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T07:10:54.508Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Pensions across generations: scenarios for the Maltese Islands

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 March 2020

Melchior Vella*
Affiliation:
Department of Economics, University of Malta, Msida, Malta
Philip von Brockdorff*
Affiliation:
Department of Economics, University of Malta, Msida, Malta
*
CONTACT Melchior Vella [email protected]
Philip von Brockdorff [email protected]

Abstract

This paper tests whether in a PAYG system there is an inter-generational balance between the contributions made during the working-career and the pension benefit received in retirement; covering different cohorts. The analysis takes Malta as a case study. Though the dependency ratio is comparatively low, the population is rapidly ageing. The results show that there is a generational imbalance with the young cohort unlikely to be any better off than those who have already retired. This however is sensitive to the assumed discount rate and the ‘no policy’ change scenario. The results also show that future generations may be net-gainers assuming a sustained level of wage growth. If, on the other hand, wage growth slows, the younger generation may become increasingly reliant on the bequests of older generations. This would explain why pressure has increased to regularly adjust the existing PAYG system as well to introduce other forms of pension schemes.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © 2019 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aaron, H. (1966). The social insurance paradox. Canadian Journal of Economics and Political Science, 32, 371374.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Andersen, T. M., & Gestsson, M. H. (2016). Longevity, growth, and intergenerational equity: The deterministic case. Macroeconomic Dynamics, 20(4), 9851021.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arrow, K. J., Cline, W. R., Maler, K. G., Munasinghe, M., Squitieri, R., & Stiglitz, J. E. (1996). Intertemporal equity, discounting, and economic efficiency. In Bruce, J. P., Lee, H., & Haites, E. F. (Eds.), Climate change 1995: Economic and social dimensions of climate change. Contribution of working group III to the second assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change (pp. 125144). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Arrow, K. J., Cropper, M. L., Gollier, C., Groom, B., Heal, G. M., Newell, R. G., … Weitzman, M. L. (2013). How should benefits and costs be discounted in an intergenerational context? The views of an expert panel (Resources for the Future Discussion Paper No. 12-53).Google Scholar
Auerbach, A. J., Gokhale, J., & Kotlikoff, L. J. (1991). Generational accounts: A meaningful alternative to deficit accounting. Tax Policy and the Economy, 5, 55110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Auerbach, A. J., Gokhale, J., & Kotlikoff, L. J. (1994). Generational accounting: A meaningful way to evaluate fiscal policy. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 8(1), 7394.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Auerbach, A. J., Kotlikoff, L. J., & Leibfritz, W. (1999). The methodology of generational accounting. In Auerbach, A. J., Kotlikoff, L. J., & Leibfritz, W. (Eds.), Generational accounting around the world (pp. 3142). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barr, N. (2002). Reforming pensions: Myths, truths, and policy choices. International Social Security Review, 55(2), 336.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barr, N. (2006). Non-financial defined contribution pensions: Mapping the terrain. In Holzmann, R. & Palmer, E. (Eds.), Pension reform: Issues and prospects for Non-financial Defined Contribution (NDC) schemes (pp. 5770). Washington, DC: World Bank.Google Scholar
Barro, R. J. (1974). Are government bonds net wealth? Journal of Political Economy, 82(6), 10951117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Billig, A., & Ménard, J. C. (2013). Actuarial balance sheets as a tool to assess the sustainability of social security pension systems. International Social Security Review, 66(2), 3152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blake, D. (2006). Pension economics. West Sussex: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
Börsch-Supan, A. (2006). What are NDC systems? What do they bring to reform strategies? In Holzmann, R. & Palmer, E. (Eds.), Pension reform: Issues and prospects for Non-financial Defined Contribution (NDC) schemes (pp. 3555). Washington, DC: World Bank.Google Scholar
Brooks, S. M., & Weaver, R. K. (2006). Lashed to the mast? The politics of NDC pension reform, chapter 15. In Holzmann, R. & Palmer, E. (Eds.), Pension reform: Issues and prospects for Non-financial Defined Contribution (NDC) schemes (pp. 345385). Washington, DC: World Bank.Google Scholar
Buiter, W. (1997). Generational accounts, aggregate saving, and intergenerational distribution. Economica, 64, 605626.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cardarelli, R., Sefton, J., & Kotlikoff, L. J. (2000). Generational accounting in the UK. The Economic Journal, 110(467), 547574.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Conde-Ruiz, J. I., & González, C. I. (2016). From bismarck to beveridge: The other pension reform in Spain. SERIEs, 7(4), 461490.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Diamond, P. (1965). National debt in a neoclassical growth model. American Economic Review, 55, 11261150.Google Scholar
European Commission. (1999). Reports and studies. Generational accounting in Europe. Brussels: Economic and Financial Affairs.Google Scholar
European Commission. (2018). The 2018 ageing report: Economic and budgetary projections for the EU member states (2016–2070). Brussels: Economic and Financial Affairs.Google Scholar
Franco, D. (1995, May). Pension liabilities – Their use and misuse in the assessment of fiscal policies (Economic Papers No. 110).Google Scholar
Gjersem, C. E. (2002). Generational accounting in the Nordic countries. Nordic Journal of Political Economy, 28, 311.Google Scholar
Gollier, C. (2002). Discounting an uncertain future. Journal of Public Economics, 85, 149166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haveman, R. (1994). Should generational accounts replace public budgets and deficits? Journal of Economic Perspectives, 8(1), 95111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hills, J. (1992). Does Britain have a ‘welfare generation’?: An empirical analysis of intergenerational equity (State Programme Discussion Paper WSP/76). London: London School of Economics.Google Scholar
Holzmann, R., & Palmer, E. (2006). The status of the NDC discussion: Introduction and overview, chapter 15. In Holzmann, R. & Palmer, E. (Eds.), Pension reform: Issues and prospects for non-financial defined contribution (NDC) schemes (pp. 911). Washington, DC: World Bank.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, P. A., Conrad, C., & Thomson, D. (Eds.). (1989). Workers versus pensioners: Intergenerational justice in an ageing world. Manchester: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
Johnson, P., & Falkingham, J. (1992). Ageing and economic welfare. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Kotlikoff, L. J., & Leibfritz, W. (1999). An international comparison of generational accounts. In Auerbach, A., Kotlikoff, L., & Leibfritz, W. (Eds.), Generational accounting around the world (pp. 73102). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Lee, R. D., & Lapkoff, S. (1988). Intergenerational flows of time and goods: Consequences of slowing population growth. Journal of Political Economy, 96(3), 618651.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miles, D., & Iben, A. (2000). The reform of pension systems: Winners and losers across generations in the United Kingdom and Germany. Economica, 67(266), 203228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nordhaus, W. D. (2007). A review of the stern review on the economics of climate change. Journal of Economic Literature, 45(3), 686702.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Palmer, E. (1999). Exit from the labor force for older workers: Can the NDC pension system help? Geneva Papers on Risk and Insurance - Issues and Practice, 24(4), 461472.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Palmer, E. (2006). Conversion to NDCs—Issues and models. In Holzmann, R. & Palmer, E. (Eds.), Pension reform: Issues and prospects for Non-financial Defined Contribution (NDC) schemes (pp. 169202). Washington, DC: World Bank.Google Scholar
Petersen, J. H. (1988). A note on old-age pensions, demography and the distribution between generations. Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics, 144(2), 333342.Google Scholar
Phillipson, C. (1991). Inter-generational relations: Conflict or consensus in the 21st century. Policy & Politics, 19(1), 2736.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Samuelson, P. A. (1958). An exact consumption-loan model of interest with or without the social contrivance of money. Journal of Political Economy, 66(6), 467482.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sartor, N. (2001). The long-run effects of the Italian pension reforms. International Tax and Public Finance, 8(1), 83111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Selén, J., & Ståhlberg, A. C. (2007). Why Sweden's pension reform was able to be successfully implemented. European Journal of Political Economy, 23(4), 11751184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thomson, D. (1991). Selfish generations? How welfare states grow old. Wellington: Bridget Williams Books.Google Scholar
von Brockdorff, P. (1999). A study of the economic consequences of ageing in the Maltese Islands (D Phil thesis). University of York, York.Google Scholar
von Brockdorff, P. (2012). Pensions and intergenerational transfers: A Malta perspective. Bank of Valletta Review, 45(Spring), 87108.Google Scholar
von Brockdorff, P., & Amaira, B. (2017). Measuring human capital: A comparative study with emphasis on Malta. Xjenza, 5(2), 110124.Google Scholar
Walker, A. (1990). The economic ‘burden’ of ageing and the prospect of intergenerational conflict. Ageing & Society, 10(4), 377396.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weitzman, M. L. (2007). Subjective expectations and asset-return puzzles. American Economic Review, 97(4), 11021130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar